Admission blood glucose as a prognostic indicator in patients with acute myocardial infarction

R. Russel, R. Ranjith, B. Sartorius
{"title":"Admission blood glucose as a prognostic indicator in patients with acute myocardial infarction","authors":"R. Russel, R. Ranjith, B. Sartorius","doi":"10.24170/16-2-3641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate the utility of admission blood glucose for predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during hospitalisation and 6 months’ postdischarge in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. Methods and results: This study recruited 2878 AMI patients admitted to the Coronary Care Unit at R. K. Khan Hospital, Durban, South Africa, from 2002 - 2014. Demographic and clinical data stored in an electronic database were obtained from all patients. Admission blood glucose levels were sub-divided into 3 groups; low (<7.8), medium (7.8-10.9) and high (≥11) mmol/l. The mean age of the study population was 57.18 ± 7 years of whom 65% were males. Self-reported diabetes was found in 59%, while 377 patients were diagnosed with diabetes based on HbA1c levels ≥6.5%, increasing the overall prevalence to 72% (n=2070). More patients were in the low admission blood glucose group (49%), medium group (16%), and high group (35%). The highest prevalence of MACE was seen in the high group (42%) compared to either the medium (39%) or low groups (26%; p<0.001), particularly for cardiogenic shock (p<0.001), cardiac failure (p<0.001) and death (p<0.001). Following multivariable logistic regression analyses of clinical and laboratory parameters associated with mortality, high admission blood glucose conferred a significantly increased odds of mortality (p=0.001). The optimal cut-off admission blood glucose value as determined via the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting in hospital and 6 months’ mortality was 8.5mmol/l (AUC of 0.63) and 8.1mmol/l (AUC of 0.61) for MACE. Conclusions: This study shows that patients have multiple risk factors for AMI with diabetes playing a central role. Although elevated admission blood glucose is an important predictor for in hospital and shortterm MACE, the cut-off value for predicting MACE and mortality has only modest predictability and further research is required to improve the performance of these measures for routine clinical use.","PeriodicalId":55781,"journal":{"name":"SA Heart Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24170/16-2-3641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the utility of admission blood glucose for predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during hospitalisation and 6 months’ postdischarge in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. Methods and results: This study recruited 2878 AMI patients admitted to the Coronary Care Unit at R. K. Khan Hospital, Durban, South Africa, from 2002 - 2014. Demographic and clinical data stored in an electronic database were obtained from all patients. Admission blood glucose levels were sub-divided into 3 groups; low (<7.8), medium (7.8-10.9) and high (≥11) mmol/l. The mean age of the study population was 57.18 ± 7 years of whom 65% were males. Self-reported diabetes was found in 59%, while 377 patients were diagnosed with diabetes based on HbA1c levels ≥6.5%, increasing the overall prevalence to 72% (n=2070). More patients were in the low admission blood glucose group (49%), medium group (16%), and high group (35%). The highest prevalence of MACE was seen in the high group (42%) compared to either the medium (39%) or low groups (26%; p<0.001), particularly for cardiogenic shock (p<0.001), cardiac failure (p<0.001) and death (p<0.001). Following multivariable logistic regression analyses of clinical and laboratory parameters associated with mortality, high admission blood glucose conferred a significantly increased odds of mortality (p=0.001). The optimal cut-off admission blood glucose value as determined via the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting in hospital and 6 months’ mortality was 8.5mmol/l (AUC of 0.63) and 8.1mmol/l (AUC of 0.61) for MACE. Conclusions: This study shows that patients have multiple risk factors for AMI with diabetes playing a central role. Although elevated admission blood glucose is an important predictor for in hospital and shortterm MACE, the cut-off value for predicting MACE and mortality has only modest predictability and further research is required to improve the performance of these measures for routine clinical use.
入院血糖作为急性心肌梗死患者的预后指标
目的:探讨入院血糖对急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者住院期间及出院后6个月主要心脏不良事件(MACE)的预测作用。方法和结果:本研究招募了2002 - 2014年在南非德班R. K. Khan医院冠状动脉监护室住院的2878例AMI患者。所有患者的人口学和临床数据存储在电子数据库中。入院血糖水平再分为3组;低(<7.8),中(7.8-10.9)和高(≥11)mmol/l。研究人群的平均年龄为57.18±7岁,其中65%为男性。59%的患者自我报告患有糖尿病,而377例患者根据HbA1c水平≥6.5%被诊断患有糖尿病,总患病率增加到72% (n=2070)。入院时低血糖组(49%)、中血糖组(16%)、高血糖组(35%)较多。MACE发生率最高的是高组(42%),而中等组(39%)或低组(26%;P <0.001),特别是心源性休克(P <0.001)、心力衰竭(P <0.001)和死亡(P <0.001)。在对与死亡率相关的临床和实验室参数进行多变量logistic回归分析后,入院时高血糖显著增加了死亡率(p=0.001)。通过受试者工作特征曲线预测住院和6个月死亡率的最佳入院血糖临界值为8.5mmol/l (AUC为0.63),MACE为8.1mmol/l (AUC为0.61)。结论:本研究表明AMI患者存在多种危险因素,糖尿病起核心作用。虽然入院血糖升高是住院和短期MACE的重要预测指标,但预测MACE和死亡率的临界值只有适度的可预测性,需要进一步研究以提高这些指标在常规临床应用中的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信