Qualitative Intention-aware Attribute-based Access Control Policy Refinement

Shohei Mitani, Jonghoon Kwon, N. Ghate, Taniya Singh, Hirofumi Ueda, A. Perrig
{"title":"Qualitative Intention-aware Attribute-based Access Control Policy Refinement","authors":"Shohei Mitani, Jonghoon Kwon, N. Ghate, Taniya Singh, Hirofumi Ueda, A. Perrig","doi":"10.1145/3589608.3593841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Designing access control policies is often expensive and tedious due to the heterogeneous systems, services, and diverse user demands. Although ABAC policy and decision engine creation methods based on machine learning have been proposed, they cannot make good access decisions for applications and situations not envisioned by the decision-makers who provide training examples. It results in over-and under-permissiveness. In this paper, we propose a framework that refines pre-developed policies. It creates a decision engine that makes better decisions than those policies. Inspired by multiple criteria decision theory, our method uses the policy manager’s qualitative intentions behind their judgments to guide access decisions so that more benefits are expected. In the evaluation, we prepare a coarse and relatively elaborate policy. We refine the coarse policy to obtain a decision engine that is compared for the similarity in access decisions with the elaborate policy using AUC as a measure. The results show that our method improves the coarse policy by a difference of 12–26% in AUC and outperforms the conventional machine learning methods by a difference of 3–11% in AUC.","PeriodicalId":74509,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... ACM symposium on access control models and technologies. ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies","volume":"2016 1","pages":"201-208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... ACM symposium on access control models and technologies. ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3589608.3593841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Designing access control policies is often expensive and tedious due to the heterogeneous systems, services, and diverse user demands. Although ABAC policy and decision engine creation methods based on machine learning have been proposed, they cannot make good access decisions for applications and situations not envisioned by the decision-makers who provide training examples. It results in over-and under-permissiveness. In this paper, we propose a framework that refines pre-developed policies. It creates a decision engine that makes better decisions than those policies. Inspired by multiple criteria decision theory, our method uses the policy manager’s qualitative intentions behind their judgments to guide access decisions so that more benefits are expected. In the evaluation, we prepare a coarse and relatively elaborate policy. We refine the coarse policy to obtain a decision engine that is compared for the similarity in access decisions with the elaborate policy using AUC as a measure. The results show that our method improves the coarse policy by a difference of 12–26% in AUC and outperforms the conventional machine learning methods by a difference of 3–11% in AUC.
基于定性意向感知属性的访问控制策略细化
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信