{"title":"In Memoriam: Fred Siegel","authors":"D. Pan","doi":"10.3817/0623203177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fred Siegel’s passing on May 7th of this year was a profound loss for us all. A frequent guest and participant at our events, he contributed to Telos from the 1980s to the 2020 publication of his last book, The Crisis of Liberalism: Prelude to Trump. His ideas had a defining impact on Paul Piccone and the journal’s development, laying the foundations for what would become the Telos populist critique of liberalism. With a keen ear for the right turn of phrase to describe a complex idea, he titled his seminal essay for Telos “Is Archie Bunker Fit to Rule? Or: How Immanuel Kant Became One of the Founding Fathers.”1 Setting Archie Bunker as the representative of democracy against the intellectual Immanuel Kant, Siegel succinctly crystallized what was at stake as well as the audacity of his argument, especially for a Telos readership that was inclined to support German philosophy over American pop culture. In making his case for Archie Bunker, Siegel attacked with eloquence and perspicacity the intellectual foundations of liberal thinking.","PeriodicalId":43573,"journal":{"name":"Telos","volume":"26 1","pages":"177 - 179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telos","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3817/0623203177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Fred Siegel’s passing on May 7th of this year was a profound loss for us all. A frequent guest and participant at our events, he contributed to Telos from the 1980s to the 2020 publication of his last book, The Crisis of Liberalism: Prelude to Trump. His ideas had a defining impact on Paul Piccone and the journal’s development, laying the foundations for what would become the Telos populist critique of liberalism. With a keen ear for the right turn of phrase to describe a complex idea, he titled his seminal essay for Telos “Is Archie Bunker Fit to Rule? Or: How Immanuel Kant Became One of the Founding Fathers.”1 Setting Archie Bunker as the representative of democracy against the intellectual Immanuel Kant, Siegel succinctly crystallized what was at stake as well as the audacity of his argument, especially for a Telos readership that was inclined to support German philosophy over American pop culture. In making his case for Archie Bunker, Siegel attacked with eloquence and perspicacity the intellectual foundations of liberal thinking.
弗雷德·西格尔于今年5月7日去世,这对我们所有人来说都是一个巨大的损失。他是我们活动的常客和参与者,从20世纪80年代到2020年出版他的最后一本书《自由主义的危机:特朗普的前奏》(the Crisis of Liberalism: Prelude to Trump),他一直为Telos撰稿。他的思想对保罗·皮科内(Paul Piccone)和《华尔街日报》的发展产生了决定性的影响,为后来泰罗斯民粹主义对自由主义的批判奠定了基础。他善于用恰当的措辞来描述一个复杂的想法,他为泰罗斯撰写的开创性文章的标题是《阿奇·邦克适合统治吗?》或者:伊曼努尔·康德如何成为开国元勋之一。1西格尔将阿奇·邦克(Archie Bunker)设定为民主的代表人物,与知识分子伊曼努尔·康德(Immanuel Kant)对抗,简明扼要地阐明了其中的利害关系,以及他的观点的大胆之处,尤其是对于倾向于支持德国哲学而非美国流行文化的《泰罗斯》读者而言。在为阿奇·邦克辩护时,西格尔以雄辩和敏锐的眼光攻击了自由主义思想的知识基础。