How Many is Greater than Five: A Comprehensive Model Proposal for the United Nations Security Council

Ramazan Erdaǧ
{"title":"How Many is Greater than Five: A Comprehensive Model Proposal for the United Nations Security Council","authors":"Ramazan Erdaǧ","doi":"10.21599/atjir.04046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The United Nations (UN) appeared as a regulator of the international system after World War II. The main purpose of the UN is to prevent war and conflicts. In realist perspective it was a holder of balance. In the post-Cold War world order, it has been widely criticized, especially the structure of the UN Security Council, which is composed of just five permanent states. The debates on reforming and reconstructing the UN Security Council came to the world's attention once again with the Arab Spring and Syria crises. This article firstly discusses the UN Security Councils structural problems, reform process and its competency in solving international conflict resolution. Then it moves into analyzing the reform proposals and new perspectives on the UN Security Council. The study emphasizes that the current structure of the UN Security Council is insufficient in conflict resolution, and structural reform required in the context of new international security agendas and norms. The paper argues that the structure and Charter of the UN at present cannot allow or adopt any reform proposals due to opposition from veto bearing members. In order to change the structure and decision making process of the Security Council, firstly the UN has to adopt a new Charter in terms of new future vision.","PeriodicalId":7411,"journal":{"name":"Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations","volume":"69 1","pages":"83-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21599/atjir.04046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The United Nations (UN) appeared as a regulator of the international system after World War II. The main purpose of the UN is to prevent war and conflicts. In realist perspective it was a holder of balance. In the post-Cold War world order, it has been widely criticized, especially the structure of the UN Security Council, which is composed of just five permanent states. The debates on reforming and reconstructing the UN Security Council came to the world's attention once again with the Arab Spring and Syria crises. This article firstly discusses the UN Security Councils structural problems, reform process and its competency in solving international conflict resolution. Then it moves into analyzing the reform proposals and new perspectives on the UN Security Council. The study emphasizes that the current structure of the UN Security Council is insufficient in conflict resolution, and structural reform required in the context of new international security agendas and norms. The paper argues that the structure and Charter of the UN at present cannot allow or adopt any reform proposals due to opposition from veto bearing members. In order to change the structure and decision making process of the Security Council, firstly the UN has to adopt a new Charter in terms of new future vision.
几个比五个大:联合国安理会的综合示范提案
第二次世界大战后,联合国作为国际体系的监管者出现。联合国的主要目的是防止战争和冲突。从现实主义的角度来看,它是一种平衡。在冷战后的世界秩序中,它受到了广泛的批评,尤其是联合国安理会的结构,它仅由五个常任理事国组成。随着“阿拉伯之春”和叙利亚危机的爆发,关于联合国安理会改革和重建的讨论再次引起了世界的关注。本文首先讨论了联合国安理会的结构问题、改革进程及其在解决国际冲突方面的能力。然后,它开始分析改革建议和对联合国安理会的新看法。该研究强调,联合国安理会目前的结构不足以解决冲突,需要在新的国际安全议程和规范的背景下进行结构改革。本文认为,由于拥有否决权的成员国的反对,目前联合国的结构和宪章无法允许或采纳任何改革建议。为了改变安理会的结构和决策过程,首先,联合国必须通过新的《宪章》,以实现新的未来愿景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信