cDNA Microarray analysis of vascular gene expression after nitric oxide donor infusion in rats: Implications for nitrate tolerance mechanisms

AAPS PharmSci Pub Date : 2008-01-01 DOI:10.1208/ps040208
E. Wang, W. Lee, D. Brazeau, H. Fung
{"title":"cDNA Microarray analysis of vascular gene expression after nitric oxide donor infusion in rats: Implications for nitrate tolerance mechanisms","authors":"E. Wang, W. Lee, D. Brazeau, H. Fung","doi":"10.1208/ps040208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vascular nitrate tolerance is often accompanied by changes in the activity and/or expression of a number of proteins. However, it is not known whether these changes are associated with the vasodilatory properties of nitrates, or with their tolerance mechanisms. We examined the hemodynamic effects and vascular gene expressions of 2 nitric oxide (NO) donors: nitroglycerin (NTG) and S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP). Rats received 10 μg/min NTG, SNAP, or vehicle infusion for 8 hours. Hemodynamic tolerance was monitored by the maximal mean arterial pressure (MAP) response to a 30-μg NTG or SNAP bolus challenge dose (CD) at various times during infusion. Gene expression in rat aorta after NTG or SNAP treatment was determined using cDNA microarrays, and the relative differences in expression after drug treatment were evaluated using several statistical techniques. MAP response of the NTG CD was attenuated from the first hour of NTG infusion (P<.001, analysis of variance [ANOVA]), but not after SNAP (P>.05, ANOVA) or control infusion (P> .05, ANOVA). Student t-statistics revealed that 447 rat genes in the aorta were significantly altered by NTG treatment (P <.05). An adjusted t-statistic approach using resampling techniques identified a subset of 290 genes that remained significantly different between NTG treatment vs control. In contrast, SNAP treatment resulted in the up-regulation of only 7 genes and the downregulation of 34 genes. These results indicate that continuous NTG infusion induced widespread changes in vascular gene expression, many of which are consistent with the multifactorial and complex mechanisms reported for nitrate tolerance.","PeriodicalId":6918,"journal":{"name":"AAPS PharmSci","volume":"45 1","pages":"45-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS PharmSci","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1208/ps040208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Vascular nitrate tolerance is often accompanied by changes in the activity and/or expression of a number of proteins. However, it is not known whether these changes are associated with the vasodilatory properties of nitrates, or with their tolerance mechanisms. We examined the hemodynamic effects and vascular gene expressions of 2 nitric oxide (NO) donors: nitroglycerin (NTG) and S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP). Rats received 10 μg/min NTG, SNAP, or vehicle infusion for 8 hours. Hemodynamic tolerance was monitored by the maximal mean arterial pressure (MAP) response to a 30-μg NTG or SNAP bolus challenge dose (CD) at various times during infusion. Gene expression in rat aorta after NTG or SNAP treatment was determined using cDNA microarrays, and the relative differences in expression after drug treatment were evaluated using several statistical techniques. MAP response of the NTG CD was attenuated from the first hour of NTG infusion (P<.001, analysis of variance [ANOVA]), but not after SNAP (P>.05, ANOVA) or control infusion (P> .05, ANOVA). Student t-statistics revealed that 447 rat genes in the aorta were significantly altered by NTG treatment (P <.05). An adjusted t-statistic approach using resampling techniques identified a subset of 290 genes that remained significantly different between NTG treatment vs control. In contrast, SNAP treatment resulted in the up-regulation of only 7 genes and the downregulation of 34 genes. These results indicate that continuous NTG infusion induced widespread changes in vascular gene expression, many of which are consistent with the multifactorial and complex mechanisms reported for nitrate tolerance.
一氧化氮供体输注后大鼠血管基因表达的cDNA芯片分析:硝酸盐耐受机制的意义
血管硝酸盐耐受性通常伴随着一些蛋白质活性和/或表达的变化。然而,尚不清楚这些变化是否与硝酸盐的血管扩张特性有关,或者与它们的耐受机制有关。我们检测了2种一氧化氮(NO)供体:硝酸甘油(NTG)和s -亚硝基-n -乙酰青霉胺(SNAP)的血流动力学效应和血管基因表达。大鼠分别接受10 μg/min的NTG、SNAP或载药输注8小时。通过对30 μg NTG或SNAP冲击剂量(CD)的最大平均动脉压(MAP)反应来监测血流动力学耐受性。采用cDNA芯片技术检测NTG或SNAP治疗后大鼠主动脉的基因表达,并采用多种统计技术评估药物治疗后的相对表达差异。NTG CD的MAP反应从输注NTG第1小时开始减弱(P> 0.05,方差分析)或对照组输注(P> 0.05,方差分析)。学生t统计结果显示,NTG处理显著改变了大鼠主动脉中447个基因(P < 0.05)。使用重采样技术的调整t统计方法确定了290个基因子集在NTG处理与对照组之间仍然存在显着差异。相比之下,SNAP处理只导致7个基因上调,34个基因下调。这些结果表明,持续输注NTG诱导了血管基因表达的广泛变化,其中许多变化与报道的硝酸盐耐受的多因素和复杂机制一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信