Explainable Logic-Based Argumentation

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Comma Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3233/FAIA220139
O. Arieli, A. Borg, Matthis Hesse, Christian Straßer
{"title":"Explainable Logic-Based Argumentation","authors":"O. Arieli, A. Borg, Matthis Hesse, Christian Straßer","doi":"10.3233/FAIA220139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has gained increasing interest in recent years in the argumentation community. In this paper we consider this topic in the context of logic-based argumentation, showing that the latter is a particularly promising paradigm for facilitating explainable AI. In particular, we provide two representations of abductive reasoning by sequent-based argumentation frameworks and show that such frameworks successfully cope with related challenges, such as the handling of synonyms, justifications, and logical equivalences.","PeriodicalId":36616,"journal":{"name":"Comma","volume":"65 1","pages":"32-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA220139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has gained increasing interest in recent years in the argumentation community. In this paper we consider this topic in the context of logic-based argumentation, showing that the latter is a particularly promising paradigm for facilitating explainable AI. In particular, we provide two representations of abductive reasoning by sequent-based argumentation frameworks and show that such frameworks successfully cope with related challenges, such as the handling of synonyms, justifications, and logical equivalences.
可解释的逻辑论证
. 近年来,可解释人工智能(XAI)在论证界引起了越来越多的兴趣。在本文中,我们在基于逻辑的论证的背景下考虑这个主题,表明后者是促进可解释人工智能的一个特别有前途的范式。特别是,我们通过基于顺序的论证框架提供了溯因推理的两种表示,并表明这些框架成功地应对了相关的挑战,例如处理同义词、证明和逻辑等价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Comma
Comma Arts and Humanities-Conservation
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信