Review and Comparative Study of Methodologies for Hydrodynamic Analysis of Nearshore Floating Solar Farms

Chi Zhang, H. Santo, A. Magee
{"title":"Review and Comparative Study of Methodologies for Hydrodynamic Analysis of Nearshore Floating Solar Farms","authors":"Chi Zhang, H. Santo, A. Magee","doi":"10.4043/31673-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The ocean surface offers enormous potential for generating renewable energy, but cost-effective, reliable, and robust systems are needed. Developing floating solar farms (FSF) can contribute to the process of reducing carbon emissions. However, the rational methodology for hydrodynamic analysis of floating solar farms is still not well established. This paper aims to identify a suitable methodology for the analysis of floating solar farms for mild and moderate environments in nearshore, and eventually deeper offshore deployments.\n This paper reviews the various type of FSFs developed in recent years and the methodologies applied to evaluate their hydrodynamic performance. Following that, the paper focuses on assessing three potential methodologies for the evaluation of the hydrodynamic performance of articulated FSFs in a nearshore region. The three methods are the two-step approach with multi-body radiation and diffraction analysis, hydroelastic/generalized mode method, and empirical approach utilizing Morison's equation. To evaluate these methods, a simplified small-scale FSF which is comprised of 16 articulated box-type modules, is established. A soft mooring system is introduced to constraint the horizontal motion of the farm. The small-scale farm is representative of a typical large FSF in the nearshore region of Singapore. Numerical models of the farm based on the three methods are established separately, and the dynamic responses of the farm are simulated and analyzed. The motion response operators of the modules of the FSF covering the typical wave periods in nearshore conditions are obtained, and the results from the three methods are evaluated in terms of their efficiency and accuracy.\n It is found that the three methods show consistent results of the dynamic responses of the solar farm in long waves. However, some discrepancies are present in short waves, mainly due to the increasing importance of hydrodynamic interactions which are neglected in one of these methods. The results could be a useful reference for the design and hydrodynamic analysis of similar FSFs.","PeriodicalId":11081,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, March 23, 2022","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, March 23, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/31673-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ocean surface offers enormous potential for generating renewable energy, but cost-effective, reliable, and robust systems are needed. Developing floating solar farms (FSF) can contribute to the process of reducing carbon emissions. However, the rational methodology for hydrodynamic analysis of floating solar farms is still not well established. This paper aims to identify a suitable methodology for the analysis of floating solar farms for mild and moderate environments in nearshore, and eventually deeper offshore deployments. This paper reviews the various type of FSFs developed in recent years and the methodologies applied to evaluate their hydrodynamic performance. Following that, the paper focuses on assessing three potential methodologies for the evaluation of the hydrodynamic performance of articulated FSFs in a nearshore region. The three methods are the two-step approach with multi-body radiation and diffraction analysis, hydroelastic/generalized mode method, and empirical approach utilizing Morison's equation. To evaluate these methods, a simplified small-scale FSF which is comprised of 16 articulated box-type modules, is established. A soft mooring system is introduced to constraint the horizontal motion of the farm. The small-scale farm is representative of a typical large FSF in the nearshore region of Singapore. Numerical models of the farm based on the three methods are established separately, and the dynamic responses of the farm are simulated and analyzed. The motion response operators of the modules of the FSF covering the typical wave periods in nearshore conditions are obtained, and the results from the three methods are evaluated in terms of their efficiency and accuracy. It is found that the three methods show consistent results of the dynamic responses of the solar farm in long waves. However, some discrepancies are present in short waves, mainly due to the increasing importance of hydrodynamic interactions which are neglected in one of these methods. The results could be a useful reference for the design and hydrodynamic analysis of similar FSFs.
近岸浮式太阳能发电场水动力分析方法综述与比较研究
海洋表面提供了产生可再生能源的巨大潜力,但需要具有成本效益、可靠和强大的系统。开发浮动太阳能农场(FSF)有助于减少碳排放。然而,对浮动太阳能发电场进行水动力分析的合理方法仍未得到很好的建立。本文旨在确定一种合适的方法来分析近海温和和中等环境下的浮动太阳能农场,并最终在更深的海上部署。本文综述了近年来发展起来的各种类型的水动力结构,以及评价其水动力性能的方法。在此基础上,本文重点讨论了近岸地区铰接式浮桥水动力性能评估的三种潜在方法。这三种方法分别是采用多体辐射和衍射分析的两步法、水弹性/广义模态法和利用Morison方程的经验法。为了评价这些方法,建立了一个由16个铰接式箱型模块组成的简化的小尺度FSF。引入软系泊系统来约束农场的水平运动。这个小型农场是新加坡近岸地区典型的大型FSF的代表。分别建立了基于这三种方法的电场数值模型,并对电场的动力响应进行了仿真分析。得到了覆盖近岸典型波浪周期的FSF模块运动响应算子,并对三种方法的效率和精度进行了评价。结果表明,三种方法对长波场的动态响应结果一致。然而,在短波中存在一些差异,这主要是由于水动力相互作用的重要性日益增加,而在这些方法中有一种被忽略了。研究结果可为同类结构的设计和水动力分析提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信