Sigma-Metric Analysis to Evaluate Quality Management of Analytical Processes Using RCA and QGI in a Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory, South India

S. Nilakantam, Kusuma Kasapura Shivashankar, Akila Prashant, Melanahalli Dayananda, Suma M. Nataraj, Namratha G Dayananda
{"title":"Sigma-Metric Analysis to Evaluate Quality Management of Analytical Processes Using RCA and QGI in a Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory, South India","authors":"S. Nilakantam, Kusuma Kasapura Shivashankar, Akila Prashant, Melanahalli Dayananda, Suma M. Nataraj, Namratha G Dayananda","doi":"10.55691/2278-344x.1035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction : This study aimed to identify laboratory errors at the earliest through Sigma-metric analysis and to evaluate quality management of analytical processes. Methods : Sigma-metrics and Quality Goal Index (QGI) were calculated by harvesting the IQC and EQC data of an accredited laboratory for 31 biochemical parameters run on Roche Cobas6000 and e411. Those with Sigma (cid:1) 2 were further analysed by applying the various Westgard rules, as suggested Results : Nearly 13 chemistry analytes showed world-class performance with Sigma > 6 and most of the immunoassay parameters showed marginal performance with sigma > 2 (cid:1) 6. Sodium, Chloride, Total T4, Beta-HCG and TSH were found to have Sigma < 2 indicating unacceptable performance. A signi fi cant improvement was observed in the Sigma-metrics analysis after performing the root cause analysis Conclusion : Sigma-metric analyses the quality management of various analytical processes in biochemistry. The poor assay performance will be picked up by the Root cause analysis and Quality Goal Indices calculation. With the help of RCA and QGI, we plan to increase the resource management by decreasing the frequency of QC runs.","PeriodicalId":54094,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health and Allied Sciences","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health and Allied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55691/2278-344x.1035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction : This study aimed to identify laboratory errors at the earliest through Sigma-metric analysis and to evaluate quality management of analytical processes. Methods : Sigma-metrics and Quality Goal Index (QGI) were calculated by harvesting the IQC and EQC data of an accredited laboratory for 31 biochemical parameters run on Roche Cobas6000 and e411. Those with Sigma (cid:1) 2 were further analysed by applying the various Westgard rules, as suggested Results : Nearly 13 chemistry analytes showed world-class performance with Sigma > 6 and most of the immunoassay parameters showed marginal performance with sigma > 2 (cid:1) 6. Sodium, Chloride, Total T4, Beta-HCG and TSH were found to have Sigma < 2 indicating unacceptable performance. A signi fi cant improvement was observed in the Sigma-metrics analysis after performing the root cause analysis Conclusion : Sigma-metric analyses the quality management of various analytical processes in biochemistry. The poor assay performance will be picked up by the Root cause analysis and Quality Goal Indices calculation. With the help of RCA and QGI, we plan to increase the resource management by decreasing the frequency of QC runs.
西格玛-度量分析评价使用RCA和QGI在印度南部临床生物化学实验室的分析过程的质量管理
本研究旨在通过西格玛-度量分析尽早发现实验室错误,并评价分析过程的质量管理。方法:收集认可实验室在罗氏Cobas6000和e411上运行的31项生化参数的IQC和EQC数据,计算Sigma-metrics和质量目标指数(QGI)。结果:近13种化学分析物在Sigma bbb6 (cid:1)下表现为世界级水平,大部分免疫测定参数在Sigma > (cid:1) 6下表现为边缘性水平。钠、氯化物、总T4、β - hcg和TSH的Sigma < 2表明表现不佳。在进行根本原因分析后,西格玛计量分析有了显著的改善。结论:西格玛计量分析了生物化学各分析过程的质量管理。通过根本原因分析和质量目标指标的计算,找出分析结果不佳的地方。在RCA和QGI的帮助下,我们计划通过减少QC运行的频率来增加资源管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信