{"title":"Tradurre per comprendere: colpa, pentimento e rinascita in “Semejnoe sčast’e” di Lev Tolstoj e nella traduzione italiana di Clemente Rebora","authors":"A. Bonola","doi":"10.7358/LING-2013-002-BONO","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay deals with the issue of guilt, repentance and rebirth in the short novel Semejnoe scast’e ( Family Happiness ) by Lev N. Tolstoy (1859). The author first considers the concepts of ‘offense’ , ‘repentance’ and ‘forgiveness’ through an analysis of the Russian terminology used by Tolstoy for these semantic fields ( obida , dosada , vina , raskajanie , pokajanie ); next, in an analysis of Clemente Rebora’s Italian translation (1920), special attention is paid to the differences from the original text that signal the translator’s interpretive reading, which, at the same time, becomes a tool for understanding it. It is shown how, in the transition from Russian into Italian, semantic shifts and phonetic symbolism add a mystical tension to the original Tolstoyan text which is typical of the poetry of Clemente Rebora.","PeriodicalId":40208,"journal":{"name":"Linguae &-Rivista di Lingue e Culture Moderne","volume":"12 1","pages":"31-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguae &-Rivista di Lingue e Culture Moderne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7358/LING-2013-002-BONO","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This essay deals with the issue of guilt, repentance and rebirth in the short novel Semejnoe scast’e ( Family Happiness ) by Lev N. Tolstoy (1859). The author first considers the concepts of ‘offense’ , ‘repentance’ and ‘forgiveness’ through an analysis of the Russian terminology used by Tolstoy for these semantic fields ( obida , dosada , vina , raskajanie , pokajanie ); next, in an analysis of Clemente Rebora’s Italian translation (1920), special attention is paid to the differences from the original text that signal the translator’s interpretive reading, which, at the same time, becomes a tool for understanding it. It is shown how, in the transition from Russian into Italian, semantic shifts and phonetic symbolism add a mystical tension to the original Tolstoyan text which is typical of the poetry of Clemente Rebora.