Showrooming versus webrooming: Examining motivational differences in omnichannel exploratory behaviors

IF 2.9 Q2 BUSINESS
Jennifer Huh, Hye-young Kim
{"title":"Showrooming versus webrooming: Examining motivational differences in omnichannel exploratory behaviors","authors":"Jennifer Huh, Hye-young Kim","doi":"10.1080/09593969.2022.2048413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study investigates the differences between showrooming and webrooming from the exploratory behavioral perspective. Based on the epistemic theory of curiosity, this study tests a conceptual model delineating two independent variables (i.e., interest- and deprivation-curiosity), two mediating variables (i.e., market mavenism, consumer innovativeness), and two dependent variables (i.e., actual showrooming experience, actual webrooming experience). A total of 358 participants were recruited through Amazon M Turk, and structural equation modelling analysis was conducted to test the hypothesized model. The study revealed that market mavenism mediates between interest-curiosity and webrooming, whereas consumer innovativeness mediates between deprivation-curiosity and both showrooming and webrooming. This indicates that showroomers and webroomers have different characteristics and are driven by different motivational factors. The study makes theoretical contributions as it provides a novel approach to examining the differences between showrooming and webrooming behavior. Further, practical implications to provide a novel experience are suggested for omnichannel retailers.","PeriodicalId":47139,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Retail Distribution and Consumer Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Retail Distribution and Consumer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593969.2022.2048413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates the differences between showrooming and webrooming from the exploratory behavioral perspective. Based on the epistemic theory of curiosity, this study tests a conceptual model delineating two independent variables (i.e., interest- and deprivation-curiosity), two mediating variables (i.e., market mavenism, consumer innovativeness), and two dependent variables (i.e., actual showrooming experience, actual webrooming experience). A total of 358 participants were recruited through Amazon M Turk, and structural equation modelling analysis was conducted to test the hypothesized model. The study revealed that market mavenism mediates between interest-curiosity and webrooming, whereas consumer innovativeness mediates between deprivation-curiosity and both showrooming and webrooming. This indicates that showroomers and webroomers have different characteristics and are driven by different motivational factors. The study makes theoretical contributions as it provides a novel approach to examining the differences between showrooming and webrooming behavior. Further, practical implications to provide a novel experience are suggested for omnichannel retailers.
Showrooming与webrooming:考察全渠道探索行为的动机差异
摘要本研究从探索性行为学的角度探讨了“展厅入店”和“网页入店”的差异。基于好奇心的认知理论,本研究检验了一个包含两个自变量(兴趣-好奇心和剥夺-好奇心)、两个中介变量(市场至上主义、消费者创新)和两个因变量(实际展厅体验、实际展厅体验)的概念模型。通过Amazon M Turk共招募了358名参与者,并进行结构方程建模分析,对假设模型进行检验。研究发现,市场至上主义在兴趣-好奇和新刷癖之间起中介作用,而消费者创新在剥夺-好奇和新刷癖之间起中介作用。这表明,“展厅客”和“网络客”具有不同的特征,受不同的动机因素驱动。该研究的理论贡献在于,它提供了一种新的方法来检验“展厅”和“网页”行为之间的差异。此外,本文还提出了为全渠道零售商提供新颖体验的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信