Velocity-Based Storage Assignment in Semi-Automated Storage Systems

IF 0.1 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Rong Yuan, S. Graves, Tolga Çezik
{"title":"Velocity-Based Storage Assignment in Semi-Automated Storage Systems","authors":"Rong Yuan, S. Graves, Tolga Çezik","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2889354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our research focuses on the storage decision in a semi-automated storage system. In a semi-automated storage system, the inventory is stored on mobile storage pods. In a typical system, each storage pod carries a mixture of items, and the inventory of each item is spread over multiple storage pods. The storage pods are mobile in that a pod can be lifted and transported by a robotic drive. These storage pods are stored within a storage zone that has stationary stations for picking and stowing on its boundary. The robotic drives transport the pods to these stations at which operators conduct pick or stow operations. The storage decision is to decide to which storage location within the storage zone to return a pod upon the completion of a pick or stow operation. The storage decision has a direct impact on the total travel time, and hence the workload of the robotic drives. We develop a fluid model to analyze the performance of velocity-based storage policies. With this model, we can characterize the possible improvement from applying a velocity-based storage policy in comparison to the random storage policy that returns the pod to a randomly-chosen storage location. Within the category of velocity-based storage, we show that class-based storage with two or three classes can achieve most of the benefits from full-velocity storage. We show that the benefits from velocity-based storage increase with greater variation in the pod velocities. To validate the fluid model we build a discrete-time simulator with real industry data. We observe an 8% to 11% reduction in the travel distance with 2-class or 3-class storage system, depending on the parameter settings. From a sensitivity analysis we establish the robustness of the class-based storage policies as they continue to perform well under a broad range of warehouse settings including different zoning strategies, resource utilization levels and space utilization levels.","PeriodicalId":49886,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing Engineering","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"49","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2889354","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

Abstract

Our research focuses on the storage decision in a semi-automated storage system. In a semi-automated storage system, the inventory is stored on mobile storage pods. In a typical system, each storage pod carries a mixture of items, and the inventory of each item is spread over multiple storage pods. The storage pods are mobile in that a pod can be lifted and transported by a robotic drive. These storage pods are stored within a storage zone that has stationary stations for picking and stowing on its boundary. The robotic drives transport the pods to these stations at which operators conduct pick or stow operations. The storage decision is to decide to which storage location within the storage zone to return a pod upon the completion of a pick or stow operation. The storage decision has a direct impact on the total travel time, and hence the workload of the robotic drives. We develop a fluid model to analyze the performance of velocity-based storage policies. With this model, we can characterize the possible improvement from applying a velocity-based storage policy in comparison to the random storage policy that returns the pod to a randomly-chosen storage location. Within the category of velocity-based storage, we show that class-based storage with two or three classes can achieve most of the benefits from full-velocity storage. We show that the benefits from velocity-based storage increase with greater variation in the pod velocities. To validate the fluid model we build a discrete-time simulator with real industry data. We observe an 8% to 11% reduction in the travel distance with 2-class or 3-class storage system, depending on the parameter settings. From a sensitivity analysis we establish the robustness of the class-based storage policies as they continue to perform well under a broad range of warehouse settings including different zoning strategies, resource utilization levels and space utilization levels.
半自动存储系统中基于速度的存储分配
本文主要研究半自动化存储系统中的存储决策问题。在半自动存储系统中,库存存储在移动存储舱中。在典型的系统中,每个存储舱携带各种物品,每个物品的库存分布在多个存储舱中。储存罐是可移动的,因为储存罐可以通过机器人驱动装置提起和运输。这些存储舱存储在一个存储区内,在其边界上有固定的拣选和装载站。机器人驱动器将吊舱运送到这些站点,操作人员在这些站点进行拣选或装载操作。存储决策是决定在完成拣选或装载操作后将吊舱返回到存储区域内的哪个存储位置。存储决策直接影响总行程时间,从而影响机器人驱动器的工作量。我们开发了一个流体模型来分析基于速度的存储策略的性能。有了这个模型,我们可以描述应用基于速度的存储策略与将pod返回到随机选择的存储位置的随机存储策略相比可能的改进。在基于速度的存储类别中,我们表明具有两个或三个类的基于类的存储可以实现全速存储的大部分好处。我们表明,基于速度的存储的好处随着豆荚速度的变化而增加。为了验证流体模型,我们建立了一个具有实际工业数据的离散时间模拟器。我们观察到,根据参数设置,2级或3级存储系统的旅行距离减少了8%到11%。通过敏感性分析,我们建立了基于类的存储策略的稳健性,因为它们在广泛的仓库设置下(包括不同的分区策略、资源利用水平和空间利用水平)继续表现良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Manufacturing Engineering
Manufacturing Engineering 工程技术-工程:制造
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信