Opportunity or Illusion? Risk Perception in Opportunity Evaluation

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Rubens Mussolin Massa, T. Andreassi, Raul Beal Partyka, Jeferson Lana
{"title":"Opportunity or Illusion? Risk Perception in Opportunity Evaluation","authors":"Rubens Mussolin Massa, T. Andreassi, Raul Beal Partyka, Jeferson Lana","doi":"10.15728/bbr.2022.1205.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes research conducted to determine which variables influence the opportunity evaluation by emerging market entrepreneurs. The study was conducted with quantitative research techniques, using data from 124 entrepreneurs in micro and small Brazilian enterprises. Hypotheses were tested with confirmatory analyses and using Structural Equations Modelling. According to previous research, results demonstrated that the smaller the perceived risk, the more positively the entrepreneurs will evaluate opportunities, affecting their propensity to act. However, the results of tests to measure correlations between the occurrence of cognitive biases and other variables were not significant, contradicting previous work that has stated that correlations exist. The findings support the concept that variables ignored when analysing our decision-making process are relevant to the result of our decisions. Besides, they may result in inconsistent illusions that can lead the decision-maker into unwarranted confidence in their capacity to understand whether an assessment of opportunity, which is inherent to the entrepreneurial process, is truly an opportunity or an illusion.","PeriodicalId":37145,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Business Review","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2022.1205.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article describes research conducted to determine which variables influence the opportunity evaluation by emerging market entrepreneurs. The study was conducted with quantitative research techniques, using data from 124 entrepreneurs in micro and small Brazilian enterprises. Hypotheses were tested with confirmatory analyses and using Structural Equations Modelling. According to previous research, results demonstrated that the smaller the perceived risk, the more positively the entrepreneurs will evaluate opportunities, affecting their propensity to act. However, the results of tests to measure correlations between the occurrence of cognitive biases and other variables were not significant, contradicting previous work that has stated that correlations exist. The findings support the concept that variables ignored when analysing our decision-making process are relevant to the result of our decisions. Besides, they may result in inconsistent illusions that can lead the decision-maker into unwarranted confidence in their capacity to understand whether an assessment of opportunity, which is inherent to the entrepreneurial process, is truly an opportunity or an illusion.
机会还是幻觉?机会评估中的风险感知
本文描述了为确定哪些变量影响新兴市场企业家的机会评估而进行的研究。这项研究采用了定量研究技术,使用了124名巴西微型和小型企业企业家的数据。通过验证性分析和结构方程模型对假设进行了检验。根据以往的研究,结果表明,感知风险越小,企业家对机会的评价就越积极,从而影响他们的行动倾向。然而,测量认知偏差的发生与其他变量之间的相关性的测试结果并不显著,这与先前的工作相矛盾,该工作表明相关性存在。研究结果支持了这样一个概念,即在分析我们的决策过程时被忽略的变量与我们的决策结果相关。此外,它们可能会导致不一致的错觉,从而导致决策者对自己的能力产生毫无根据的信心,无法理解创业过程中固有的对机会的评估是真正的机会还是错觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brazilian Business Review
Brazilian Business Review Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信