{"title":"Filozoficzna i psychologiczna analiza wyborów moralnych w grze This War of Mine","authors":"Alicja Neumann","doi":"10.18778/1689-4286.44.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Philosophical and psychological analysis of moral choices the The moral choices made both in the context of everyday life and in the reality of war fascinate psychologists and philosophers focused on experimental research on intuition. In particular, in many psychological articles, the decisions made by the subjects in different variations of the trolley problem are analyzed. Most often, complex stories are presented for respondents and they can choose between two or three options to solve the problem, but it is required to indicate the option that respondent would choose if he/she found himself in the described situation. However, technological development allows the use of increasingly emotionally engaging methods of putting subjects in such dilemmas, including computer games such as This War of Mine , by 11 bit studios. In this paper selected moral choices that players in This War of Mine are facing are considered together with the decisions that were most often made in response to them, based on pilot study. The results of these analyses will be combined with data from psychological research on moral intuitions in various dilemma situations. The aim of the proposed considerations will be to answer the question whether the context of everyday life versus the reality of war affects the change of intuition regarding just action. The significance of this kind of research for philosophical inquiry into the ethics of war will also be discussed.","PeriodicalId":30478,"journal":{"name":"HYBRIS Revista de Filosofia","volume":"2012 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HYBRIS Revista de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.44.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Philosophical and psychological analysis of moral choices the The moral choices made both in the context of everyday life and in the reality of war fascinate psychologists and philosophers focused on experimental research on intuition. In particular, in many psychological articles, the decisions made by the subjects in different variations of the trolley problem are analyzed. Most often, complex stories are presented for respondents and they can choose between two or three options to solve the problem, but it is required to indicate the option that respondent would choose if he/she found himself in the described situation. However, technological development allows the use of increasingly emotionally engaging methods of putting subjects in such dilemmas, including computer games such as This War of Mine , by 11 bit studios. In this paper selected moral choices that players in This War of Mine are facing are considered together with the decisions that were most often made in response to them, based on pilot study. The results of these analyses will be combined with data from psychological research on moral intuitions in various dilemma situations. The aim of the proposed considerations will be to answer the question whether the context of everyday life versus the reality of war affects the change of intuition regarding just action. The significance of this kind of research for philosophical inquiry into the ethics of war will also be discussed.
道德选择的哲学和心理学分析在日常生活和战争现实中做出的道德选择吸引了专注于直觉实验研究的心理学家和哲学家。特别是,在许多心理学文章中,研究对象在不同的电车问题中所做的决定。大多数情况下,复杂的故事呈现给受访者,他们可以选择两到三个选项来解决问题,但需要指出,如果他/她发现自己在所描述的情况下,受访者会选择的选项。然而,随着技术的发展,人们可以使用越来越多的情感投入方法,将主题置于这种困境中,包括11位工作室的电脑游戏,如《This War of Mine》。本文基于初步研究,将《这是我的战争》中玩家所面临的道德选择与最常做出的回应决策结合在一起进行考虑。这些分析结果将与各种困境情境下道德直觉的心理学研究数据相结合。拟议审议的目的是回答这样一个问题,即日常生活的背景与战争的现实是否会影响关于正义行动的直觉的变化。本文还将讨论这种研究对战争伦理哲学探究的意义。