Carnegie in Australia: philanthropic power and public education in the early twentieth century

IF 0.6 Q3 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES
B. Green
{"title":"Carnegie in Australia: philanthropic power and public education in the early twentieth century","authors":"B. Green","doi":"10.1108/HER-04-2019-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to outline a reconceptualised view of public education, with specific reference to early twentieth-century Australia, and to revisit the significance of the Carnegie Corporation of New York in this period. Further, in this regard, the paper proposes a neo-Foucaultian notion of philanthropic power, as an explanatory and analytical principle, with possible implications for thinking anew about the role and influence of American philanthropic organisations in the twentieth century.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe paper draws on mainly secondary sources but also works with primary sources gathered from relevant archives, including that of the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER).\n\n\nFindings\nThe paper concludes that the larger possibilities associated with the particular view of public education outlined here, referring to both public school and public libraries, were constrained by the emergence and consolidation of an increasingly professionalised view of education and schooling.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe influence of the Carnegie Corporation of New York on early twentieth-century Australian education has been increasingly acknowledged and documented in recent historical research. More recently, Carnegie has been drawn into an interdisciplinary perspective on philanthropy and public culture in Australia. This paper seeks to add to such work by looking at schools and libraries as interconnected yet loosely coupled aspects of what can be understood as, in effect, a re-conceived public education, to a significant degree sponsored by the Corporation.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe paper draws upon but seeks to extend and to some extent re-orient existing historical research on the relationship between Australian education and the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Its originality lies in its exploration of a somewhat different view of public education and the linkage it suggests in this regard with a predominantly print-centric public culture in Australia, in the first half of the twentieth century.\n","PeriodicalId":43049,"journal":{"name":"History of Education Review","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/HER-04-2019-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to outline a reconceptualised view of public education, with specific reference to early twentieth-century Australia, and to revisit the significance of the Carnegie Corporation of New York in this period. Further, in this regard, the paper proposes a neo-Foucaultian notion of philanthropic power, as an explanatory and analytical principle, with possible implications for thinking anew about the role and influence of American philanthropic organisations in the twentieth century. Design/methodology/approach The paper draws on mainly secondary sources but also works with primary sources gathered from relevant archives, including that of the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER). Findings The paper concludes that the larger possibilities associated with the particular view of public education outlined here, referring to both public school and public libraries, were constrained by the emergence and consolidation of an increasingly professionalised view of education and schooling. Research limitations/implications The influence of the Carnegie Corporation of New York on early twentieth-century Australian education has been increasingly acknowledged and documented in recent historical research. More recently, Carnegie has been drawn into an interdisciplinary perspective on philanthropy and public culture in Australia. This paper seeks to add to such work by looking at schools and libraries as interconnected yet loosely coupled aspects of what can be understood as, in effect, a re-conceived public education, to a significant degree sponsored by the Corporation. Originality/value The paper draws upon but seeks to extend and to some extent re-orient existing historical research on the relationship between Australian education and the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Its originality lies in its exploration of a somewhat different view of public education and the linkage it suggests in this regard with a predominantly print-centric public culture in Australia, in the first half of the twentieth century.
卡内基在澳大利亚:二十世纪初的慈善力量与公共教育
本文的目的是概述一个重新概念化的公共教育观点,具体参考20世纪初的澳大利亚,并重新审视纽约卡内基公司在这一时期的意义。此外,在这方面,本文提出了一种新福柯式的慈善权力概念,作为一种解释和分析原则,可能会对重新思考20世纪美国慈善组织的角色和影响产生影响。设计/方法/方法本文主要利用二手资料,但也利用从相关档案中收集的第一手资料,包括澳大利亚教育研究委员会(ACER)的资料。该论文的结论是,与这里概述的公共教育的特定观点相关的更大的可能性,包括公立学校和公共图书馆,受到日益专业化的教育和学校教育观点的出现和巩固的限制。在最近的历史研究中,纽约卡内基公司对20世纪早期澳大利亚教育的影响越来越得到承认和记录。最近,卡内基开始从跨学科的角度研究澳大利亚的慈善和公共文化。本文试图通过将学校和图书馆视为相互关联但松散耦合的方面来增加这些工作,这些方面实际上可以被理解为重新构想的公共教育,在很大程度上由公司赞助。原创性/价值本文借鉴并试图扩展并在一定程度上重新定位现有的关于澳大利亚教育与纽约卡内基公司关系的历史研究。它的独创性在于它探索了一种不同的公共教育观,并在这方面提出了与20世纪上半叶以印刷为中心的澳大利亚公共文化的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
History of Education Review
History of Education Review HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信