Basrah NGL: Best Practices for a New Sour Gas Processing Hub in Southern Iraq

Tamir Abo El Nour, T. Bodewes, M. Wharton, C. Verlaan
{"title":"Basrah NGL: Best Practices for a New Sour Gas Processing Hub in Southern Iraq","authors":"Tamir Abo El Nour, T. Bodewes, M. Wharton, C. Verlaan","doi":"10.2118/193228-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The objectives of the paper are to use the Basrah NGL gas processing project in the Basrah Gas Company JV (BGC) to demonstrate best practice application of industry solutions and appropriate technology selection, aligning with project value drivers whilst managing technical and non-technical uncertainties in decision making.\n In mid-2018 contracts were awarded for the Basrah NGL gas processing hub in Southern Iraq that will set the competitive cost and schedule benchmark for new gas plants in Iraq. Embracing Shell and industry experience to deliver a standardized and replicable design was a key priority for the project team and JV partners. Technology selections were evaluated against project value drivers to support robust decision making for current and future operations, and contracting strategy selected considering synergies across the portfolio through bundling and building on in-country experience.\n Two trains of 200 mmscf/d each have been awarded in the first development phase, however future expansion requirements are much simplified with the facility designed to be expandable to 5 replicated trains providing a total 1000 mmscf/d capacity in line with the upstream gas production forecast. The benefits of standardisation and replication lock in further cost and schedule savings for subsequent gas processing trains and continue to lower unit development and operating costs. In line with the future plans for the facilities, pre-investments were made for major infrastructure investments including gas and LPG export pipelines and high voltage power supply.\n The BGC NGL processing train design is flexible to the range of gas qualities prevalent in Southern Iraq. Technology selections have been appropriately made to consider current and future requirements both in terms of ethane and LPG recovery but also acid gas removal and Sulphur recovery solutions. In the case of Sulphur recovery, a Shell and-Paques developed, Thiopaq technology is selected to provide the most capital efficient flexible solution, whilst also providing ease of scale-up to higher recovery rates as the upstream gas supply becomes progressively more sour (with higher H2S content) over time.","PeriodicalId":11208,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, November 13, 2018","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, November 13, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/193228-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objectives of the paper are to use the Basrah NGL gas processing project in the Basrah Gas Company JV (BGC) to demonstrate best practice application of industry solutions and appropriate technology selection, aligning with project value drivers whilst managing technical and non-technical uncertainties in decision making. In mid-2018 contracts were awarded for the Basrah NGL gas processing hub in Southern Iraq that will set the competitive cost and schedule benchmark for new gas plants in Iraq. Embracing Shell and industry experience to deliver a standardized and replicable design was a key priority for the project team and JV partners. Technology selections were evaluated against project value drivers to support robust decision making for current and future operations, and contracting strategy selected considering synergies across the portfolio through bundling and building on in-country experience. Two trains of 200 mmscf/d each have been awarded in the first development phase, however future expansion requirements are much simplified with the facility designed to be expandable to 5 replicated trains providing a total 1000 mmscf/d capacity in line with the upstream gas production forecast. The benefits of standardisation and replication lock in further cost and schedule savings for subsequent gas processing trains and continue to lower unit development and operating costs. In line with the future plans for the facilities, pre-investments were made for major infrastructure investments including gas and LPG export pipelines and high voltage power supply. The BGC NGL processing train design is flexible to the range of gas qualities prevalent in Southern Iraq. Technology selections have been appropriately made to consider current and future requirements both in terms of ethane and LPG recovery but also acid gas removal and Sulphur recovery solutions. In the case of Sulphur recovery, a Shell and-Paques developed, Thiopaq technology is selected to provide the most capital efficient flexible solution, whilst also providing ease of scale-up to higher recovery rates as the upstream gas supply becomes progressively more sour (with higher H2S content) over time.
Basrah NGL:伊拉克南部新酸性气处理中心的最佳实践
本文的目标是利用Basrah天然气公司合资公司(BGC)的Basrah NGL天然气处理项目来展示行业解决方案的最佳实践应用和适当的技术选择,与项目价值驱动因素保持一致,同时管理决策中的技术和非技术不确定性。2018年年中,伊拉克南部Basrah NGL天然气加工中心的合同获得了批准,这将为伊拉克的新天然气厂设定具有竞争力的成本和进度基准。对于项目团队和合资伙伴来说,利用壳牌和行业经验来提供标准化和可复制的设计是一个关键的优先事项。根据项目价值驱动因素对技术选择进行评估,以支持当前和未来运营的稳健决策,并考虑通过捆绑和建立国内经验来实现整个投资组合的协同效应,选择合同策略。在第一个开发阶段,已经获得了两个200 mmscf/d的列车,但是未来的扩建要求将大大简化,该设施将被设计为可扩展到5个复制列车,提供总计1000 mmscf/d的能力,与上游天然气产量预测一致。标准化和复制的好处是为后续的天然气处理系统进一步节省成本和进度,并继续降低设备开发和运营成本。根据设施的未来计划,对天然气和液化石油气出口管道和高压供电等主要基础设施投资进行了前期投资。BGC天然气液化天然气处理列车设计灵活,适用于伊拉克南部普遍存在的天然气质量范围。考虑到乙烷和液化石油气回收以及酸性气体去除和硫回收解决方案的当前和未来需求,已经适当地进行了技术选择。在硫磺回收的情况下,壳牌和paques开发了thiiopaq技术,以提供最具资本效率的灵活解决方案,同时随着上游天然气供应逐渐变得更酸(硫化氢含量更高),也可以轻松扩大规模,提高采收率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信