A brief update on psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: a challenge to overcome

M. Beghi, C. Cornaggia, E. Beghi
{"title":"A brief update on psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: a challenge to overcome","authors":"M. Beghi, C. Cornaggia, E. Beghi","doi":"10.21307/jepil-2020-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures (PNES) are defined by their semiological resemblance to Epileptic Seizures (ES), not associated with specific epileptic discharges in an ictal EEG. PNES are, in fact, a feature of an underlying psychiatric disorder even if these patients are currently in the realm of epileptologists and for these reasons there is a large degree of confusion underlying the diagnosis (with an average delay of 3 years) and management of PNES. Documented PNES diagnosis would require the attack captured on video EEG (vEEG), but often it is not possible. The video registration of a seizure seen by an expert would make PNES “probable”. Conversational analysis has been demonstrated to be a very useful tool in the differential diagnosis between PNES and ES with a good rate of reliability. From a psychological point of view, PNES could be the same phenotype of different underlying mechanisms and, also for this reason, should consider these underlying processes and treatment could be sometimes seriously deficient. Many psychological approaches are anecdotally reported, but controlled studies are still lacking, and interventions still rely on clinicians’ experience. Moreover, pharmacological treatment may be recommended in adults or elderly with concomitant anxiety or depression. In conclusion, many symptoms and signs are valid but none is pathognomonic, the symptoms should be reported correctly and psychiatrists should be necessarily involved for the correct diagnosis and management of PNES.","PeriodicalId":15683,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epileptology","volume":"55 1","pages":"67 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epileptology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21307/jepil-2020-003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

SUMMARY Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures (PNES) are defined by their semiological resemblance to Epileptic Seizures (ES), not associated with specific epileptic discharges in an ictal EEG. PNES are, in fact, a feature of an underlying psychiatric disorder even if these patients are currently in the realm of epileptologists and for these reasons there is a large degree of confusion underlying the diagnosis (with an average delay of 3 years) and management of PNES. Documented PNES diagnosis would require the attack captured on video EEG (vEEG), but often it is not possible. The video registration of a seizure seen by an expert would make PNES “probable”. Conversational analysis has been demonstrated to be a very useful tool in the differential diagnosis between PNES and ES with a good rate of reliability. From a psychological point of view, PNES could be the same phenotype of different underlying mechanisms and, also for this reason, should consider these underlying processes and treatment could be sometimes seriously deficient. Many psychological approaches are anecdotally reported, but controlled studies are still lacking, and interventions still rely on clinicians’ experience. Moreover, pharmacological treatment may be recommended in adults or elderly with concomitant anxiety or depression. In conclusion, many symptoms and signs are valid but none is pathognomonic, the symptoms should be reported correctly and psychiatrists should be necessarily involved for the correct diagnosis and management of PNES.
简要介绍心因性非癫痫性发作:一个需要克服的挑战
心因性非癫痫性发作(PNES)是由其与癫痫性发作(ES)的符号学相似性来定义的,与脑电图中特定的癫痫性放电无关。事实上,PNES是一种潜在精神障碍的特征,即使这些患者目前属于癫痫学家的范畴,由于这些原因,PNES的诊断(平均延迟3年)和治疗存在很大程度的混乱。记录的PNES诊断需要在视频脑电图(vEEG)上捕获攻击,但通常是不可能的。专家看到的癫痫发作的视频注册将使PNES“可能”。会话分析已被证明是一种非常有用的工具,在PNES和ES之间的鉴别诊断具有良好的可靠性。从心理学的角度来看,PNES可能是不同潜在机制的相同表型,也正是出于这个原因,应该考虑到这些潜在过程和治疗有时可能严重不足。许多心理学方法都有轶事报道,但仍然缺乏对照研究,干预措施仍然依赖于临床医生的经验。此外,药物治疗可推荐给伴随焦虑或抑郁的成人或老年人。总之,许多症状和体征是有效的,但没有一个是病态的,应该正确报告症状,精神科医生应该参与正确的诊断和治疗PNES。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信