A Retrospective Study Establishing Pre-Pandemic Demographic Baselines for United States Source Plasma Donors

IF 0.5 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
M. Rosa-Bray, M. Bounpheng, Charlene Wisdom, T. Gierman, Mark Becker, K. Crookston
{"title":"A Retrospective Study Establishing Pre-Pandemic Demographic Baselines for United States Source Plasma Donors","authors":"M. Rosa-Bray, M. Bounpheng, Charlene Wisdom, T. Gierman, Mark Becker, K. Crookston","doi":"10.1177/26348535221129221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted plasma as a strategic resource with continually increasing demand. Demographic data for plasma donors are limited compared with blood donors. Increased information regarding pre-pandemic donor demographics may serve as a baseline for evaluation of post-pandemic practices. OBJECTIVES This study asked the question, “What were the demographics of source plasma donors in the US compared to the general population and how did these change over a five-year period preceding the pandemic?” STUDY DESIGN Donor demographic data were retrospectively analyzed for the years 2014, 2016 and 2018 from a network of US plasma centers. METHODS Routine demographic data obtained prior to source plasma collection from all plasma donors at Grifols US centers were retrospectively analyzed. Donor screening and eligibility requirements were standardized across all donor sites and met all donor eligibility requirements (Code of Federal Regulations: 21 CFR part 600). During each calendar year, only data from the first donation in that year were included with each cohort year. RESULTS This study included 1,303,049 unique donors. Donors were predominantly young adult males, although females increased from 37.4% to 41.6%. Caucasians constituted the highest proportion, followed by African American and Hispanic donors. Demographics were generally stable, but the 2018 cohort and the US population exhibited significantly different age, race/ethnicity, and sex profiles. Of 2014 donors, 9.0% returned in all three years studied (2014-2016-2018), with a higher return rate of 16.0% observed for donors returning in just two of the years (2014-2016). Multiyear donors were predominantly male and African American. CONCLUSION US plasma donor demographics over a five-year period (2014-2018) showed generally consistent characteristics but differed from the general US population. Multiyear donors were demographically distinct from single-year donors. These data serve as a snapshot of the US source plasma donor base prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":29816,"journal":{"name":"Plasmatology","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plasmatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26348535221129221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted plasma as a strategic resource with continually increasing demand. Demographic data for plasma donors are limited compared with blood donors. Increased information regarding pre-pandemic donor demographics may serve as a baseline for evaluation of post-pandemic practices. OBJECTIVES This study asked the question, “What were the demographics of source plasma donors in the US compared to the general population and how did these change over a five-year period preceding the pandemic?” STUDY DESIGN Donor demographic data were retrospectively analyzed for the years 2014, 2016 and 2018 from a network of US plasma centers. METHODS Routine demographic data obtained prior to source plasma collection from all plasma donors at Grifols US centers were retrospectively analyzed. Donor screening and eligibility requirements were standardized across all donor sites and met all donor eligibility requirements (Code of Federal Regulations: 21 CFR part 600). During each calendar year, only data from the first donation in that year were included with each cohort year. RESULTS This study included 1,303,049 unique donors. Donors were predominantly young adult males, although females increased from 37.4% to 41.6%. Caucasians constituted the highest proportion, followed by African American and Hispanic donors. Demographics were generally stable, but the 2018 cohort and the US population exhibited significantly different age, race/ethnicity, and sex profiles. Of 2014 donors, 9.0% returned in all three years studied (2014-2016-2018), with a higher return rate of 16.0% observed for donors returning in just two of the years (2014-2016). Multiyear donors were predominantly male and African American. CONCLUSION US plasma donor demographics over a five-year period (2014-2018) showed generally consistent characteristics but differed from the general US population. Multiyear donors were demographically distinct from single-year donors. These data serve as a snapshot of the US source plasma donor base prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.
建立大流行前美国血浆献血者人口基线的回顾性研究
COVID-19大流行突显了血浆作为一种需求不断增加的战略资源。与献血者相比,血浆献血者的人口统计数据有限。关于大流行前捐助者人口统计资料的更多信息可作为大流行后做法评价的基线。本研究提出了这样一个问题:“与普通人群相比,美国血浆来源献血者的人口统计数据是什么?这些人口统计数据在大流行前的5年期间是如何变化的?”研究设计回顾性分析2014年、2016年和2018年来自美国血浆中心网络的供体人口统计数据。方法回顾性分析美国Grifols中心所有血浆供者血浆采集前的常规人口统计数据。捐赠者筛选和资格要求在所有捐赠地点标准化,并满足所有捐赠者资格要求(联邦法规:21 CFR第600部分)。在每个日历年,每个队列年只包括当年首次捐赠的数据。结果本研究纳入了1,303,049名独立献血者。捐赠者主要是年轻的成年男性,尽管女性从37.4%增加到41.6%。白种人所占比例最高,其次是非洲裔美国人和西班牙裔捐赠者。人口统计数据总体稳定,但2018年的队列和美国人口在年龄、种族/民族和性别特征方面存在显著差异。在2014年的捐赠者中,9.0%的人在研究的所有三年(2014-2016-2018年)都返回了,仅在2014-2016年的两年(2014-2016年)中,捐赠者的回报率就高达16.0%。多年的捐赠者主要是男性和非裔美国人。结论:美国5年(2014-2018年)血浆供者的人口统计特征基本一致,但与美国普通人群有所不同。多年捐助者在人口统计学上不同于一年捐助者。这些数据可作为COVID-19大流行之前美国血浆供体来源基础的快照。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plasmatology
Plasmatology HEMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信