A review of current knowledge concerning size-dependent aerosol removal

Leiming Zhang, Robert Vet
{"title":"A review of current knowledge concerning size-dependent aerosol removal","authors":"Leiming Zhang,&nbsp;Robert Vet","doi":"10.1016/S1672-2515(07)60276-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The status of current knowledge on size-dependent aerosol removal by dry and wet processes, including dry deposition and impaction and nucleation scavenging, is reviewed. The largest discrepancies between theoretical estimations and measurement data on dry deposition and below-cloud scavenging are for submicron particles. Early dry deposition models, which developed based on chamber and wind tunnel measurements, tended to underestimate dry deposition velocity (<em>V</em><sub>d</sub>) for submicron particles by around one order of magnitude compared to recent field measurements. Recently developed models are able to predict reasonable <em>V</em><sub>d</sub> values for submicron particles but shift unrealistically the predicted minimum <em>V</em><sub>d</sub> to larger particle sizes. Theoretical studies of impaction scavenging of aerosol particles by falling liquid drops also substantially underestimate the scavenging coefficients for submicron particles. Empirical formulas based on field measurements can serve as an alternative to the theoretical scavenging models. Future development of size-resolved impaction scavenging models needs to include more precipitation properties (e.g., droplet surface area) and to be evaluated by detailed cloud microphysical models and available measurements. Several recently developed nucleation scavenging parameterizations for in-cloud removal of interstitial aerosol give comparable results when evaluated against parcel models; however, they need to be verified once suitable field measurements are available. More theoretical and field studies are also needed in order to better understand the role of organic aerosols in the nucleation scavenging process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100239,"journal":{"name":"China Particuology","volume":"4 6","pages":"Pages 272-282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1672-2515(07)60276-0","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Particuology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1672251507602760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

Abstract

The status of current knowledge on size-dependent aerosol removal by dry and wet processes, including dry deposition and impaction and nucleation scavenging, is reviewed. The largest discrepancies between theoretical estimations and measurement data on dry deposition and below-cloud scavenging are for submicron particles. Early dry deposition models, which developed based on chamber and wind tunnel measurements, tended to underestimate dry deposition velocity (Vd) for submicron particles by around one order of magnitude compared to recent field measurements. Recently developed models are able to predict reasonable Vd values for submicron particles but shift unrealistically the predicted minimum Vd to larger particle sizes. Theoretical studies of impaction scavenging of aerosol particles by falling liquid drops also substantially underestimate the scavenging coefficients for submicron particles. Empirical formulas based on field measurements can serve as an alternative to the theoretical scavenging models. Future development of size-resolved impaction scavenging models needs to include more precipitation properties (e.g., droplet surface area) and to be evaluated by detailed cloud microphysical models and available measurements. Several recently developed nucleation scavenging parameterizations for in-cloud removal of interstitial aerosol give comparable results when evaluated against parcel models; however, they need to be verified once suitable field measurements are available. More theoretical and field studies are also needed in order to better understand the role of organic aerosols in the nucleation scavenging process.

关于粒径依赖性气溶胶去除的现有知识综述
综述了干湿两种方法对粒径相关气溶胶去除的现状,包括干沉积、撞击和成核清除。关于干沉降和云下清除的理论估计和测量数据之间最大的差异是亚微米颗粒。早期的干沉积模型是建立在室内和风洞测量的基础上的,与最近的现场测量结果相比,往往低估了亚微米颗粒的干沉积速度(Vd)。最近开发的模型能够预测亚微米颗粒的合理Vd值,但不切实际地将预测的最小Vd值转移到更大的颗粒尺寸上。通过液滴对气溶胶颗粒进行撞击清除的理论研究也大大低估了亚微米颗粒的清除系数。基于现场测量的经验公式可以作为理论清除模型的替代方案。未来尺寸分辨撞击清除模型的发展需要包括更多的降水特性(例如,液滴表面积),并通过详细的云微物理模型和可用的测量来评估。最近开发的几种用于云中间隙气溶胶去除的成核清除参数化在与包裹模型进行评估时给出了可比的结果;然而,一旦有了合适的实地测量数据,就需要对它们进行验证。为了更好地了解有机气溶胶在成核清除过程中的作用,还需要进行更多的理论和实地研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信