Risk Burden of Coronary Perforation in Chronic Total Occlusion Recanalization: Latin American CTO Registry Analysis

M. Ribeiro, Carlos M Campos, Lucio T. Padilla, A. C. B. da Silva, J. E. T. de Paula, Marco A. Alcántara, Ricardo Santiago, Franklin Hanna, Franciele R da Silva, Karlyse C Belli, L. Azzalini, P. P. de Oliveira, G. Araujo, V. Sucato, K. Mashayekhi, A. Galassi, A. Abizaid, A. Quadros
{"title":"Risk Burden of Coronary Perforation in Chronic Total Occlusion Recanalization: Latin American CTO Registry Analysis","authors":"M. Ribeiro, Carlos M Campos, Lucio T. Padilla, A. C. B. da Silva, J. E. T. de Paula, Marco A. Alcántara, Ricardo Santiago, Franklin Hanna, Franciele R da Silva, Karlyse C Belli, L. Azzalini, P. P. de Oliveira, G. Araujo, V. Sucato, K. Mashayekhi, A. Galassi, A. Abizaid, A. Quadros","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.121.024815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Coronary perforation is a life‐threatening complication of acute percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTO), but data on midterm outcomes are limited. Methods and Results Data from LATAM (Latin American)‐CTO Registry (57 centers; 9 countries) were analyzed. We assessed the risk of 30‐day, 1‐year major adverse cardiac events of coronary perforation using time‐to‐event and weighted composite end point analysis having CTO PCI without perforation as comparators. Additionally, we studied the independent predictors of perforation in these patients. Of 2054 patients who underwent CTO PCI between 2015 and 2018, the median Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan and Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention‐Chronic total occlusions scores were 2.0 (1.0–3.0) and 1.0 (0.0–2.0), respectively. The perforation rate was 3.7%, of which 55% were Ellis class 1. After 1‐year coronary perforation had higher major adverse cardiac events rates (24.9% versus 13.3%; P<0.01). Using weighted composite end point, perforation was associated with increased bleeding and ischemic events at 6 months (P=0.04) and 1 year (P<0.01). We found as independent predictors associated with coronary perforation during CTO PCI: maximum activated clotting time (P<0.01), Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan score ≥2 (P=0.05), antegrade knuckle wire (P=0.04), and right coronary artery CTO PCI (P=0.05). Conclusions Coronary perforation was infrequent and associated with anatomical and procedural complexity, resulting in higher risk of hemorrhagic and ischemic events. Landmark and weighted analysis showed a sustained burden of major events between 6 months and 1 year follow‐up.","PeriodicalId":17189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background Coronary perforation is a life‐threatening complication of acute percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTO), but data on midterm outcomes are limited. Methods and Results Data from LATAM (Latin American)‐CTO Registry (57 centers; 9 countries) were analyzed. We assessed the risk of 30‐day, 1‐year major adverse cardiac events of coronary perforation using time‐to‐event and weighted composite end point analysis having CTO PCI without perforation as comparators. Additionally, we studied the independent predictors of perforation in these patients. Of 2054 patients who underwent CTO PCI between 2015 and 2018, the median Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan and Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention‐Chronic total occlusions scores were 2.0 (1.0–3.0) and 1.0 (0.0–2.0), respectively. The perforation rate was 3.7%, of which 55% were Ellis class 1. After 1‐year coronary perforation had higher major adverse cardiac events rates (24.9% versus 13.3%; P<0.01). Using weighted composite end point, perforation was associated with increased bleeding and ischemic events at 6 months (P=0.04) and 1 year (P<0.01). We found as independent predictors associated with coronary perforation during CTO PCI: maximum activated clotting time (P<0.01), Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan score ≥2 (P=0.05), antegrade knuckle wire (P=0.04), and right coronary artery CTO PCI (P=0.05). Conclusions Coronary perforation was infrequent and associated with anatomical and procedural complexity, resulting in higher risk of hemorrhagic and ischemic events. Landmark and weighted analysis showed a sustained burden of major events between 6 months and 1 year follow‐up.
慢性全闭塞再通冠脉穿孔的风险负担:拉丁美洲CTO注册分析
背景冠状动脉穿孔是慢性全闭塞(CTO)急性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的一种危及生命的并发症,但中期结果的数据有限。方法和结果数据来自LATAM(拉丁美洲)‐CTO注册中心(57个中心;9个国家)进行了分析。我们以无穿孔的CTO PCI为对照,采用时间-事件和加权复合终点分析来评估冠状动脉穿孔30天、1年主要心脏不良事件的风险。此外,我们研究了这些患者穿孔的独立预测因素。在2015年至2018年期间接受CTO PCI治疗的2054例患者中,日本多中心CTO注册中心和前瞻性全球慢性全闭塞干预研究注册中心的中位评分分别为2.0(1.0 - 3.0)和1.0(0.0-2.0)。射孔率3.7%,其中Ellis 1级射孔率55%。冠状动脉穿孔1年后的主要心脏不良事件发生率较高(24.9% vs 13.3%;P < 0.01)。使用加权复合终点,穿孔与6个月(P=0.04)和1年(P<0.01)出血和缺血事件增加相关。我们发现与CTO PCI时冠脉穿孔相关的独立预测因素:最大激活凝血时间(P<0.01),日本多中心CTO Registry评分≥2 (P=0.05),顺行指节线(P=0.04)和右冠状动脉CTO PCI (P=0.05)。结论冠状动脉穿孔不常见,且与解剖和手术复杂性有关,导致出血和缺血事件的风险较高。地标性和加权分析显示,随访6个月至1年期间,主要事件的持续负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信