The charm quark as a naturalness success

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Miguel Ángel Carretero Sahuquillo
{"title":"The charm quark as a naturalness success","authors":"Miguel Ángel Carretero Sahuquillo","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Undeniably, the naturalness principle has had a major role in particle physics during the last decades, in particular in model building. Nowadays, one can find a wide range of different definitions. Some of them seem mutually exclusive, but traditionally, its notion has been linked to the fine-tuning problem. Understanding naturalness as the imposition that fine-tuning problems have to vanish, for instance, due to the existence of new particles, new models as those based in </span>supersymmetry<span> were built. In order to palliate the fine-tuning problem the Higgs sector of the standard model<span> seems to suffer, new physics should have appeared already in the last LHC run. Thus, the persistence of fine-tuning has originated numerous works exploring both, the limits and the different conceptual definitions of naturalness. However, little work has been done re-examining precisely one of the main pillars naturalness advocates: its historical successes. Given the current period in which the critics to the naturalness principle are undergoing, we find important to explore in detail the historical examples often cited, primarily the charm quark proposal and its mass prediction, and see how can this contribute to the debate.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":54442,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics","volume":"68 ","pages":"Pages 51-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.06.003","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355219818301102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Undeniably, the naturalness principle has had a major role in particle physics during the last decades, in particular in model building. Nowadays, one can find a wide range of different definitions. Some of them seem mutually exclusive, but traditionally, its notion has been linked to the fine-tuning problem. Understanding naturalness as the imposition that fine-tuning problems have to vanish, for instance, due to the existence of new particles, new models as those based in supersymmetry were built. In order to palliate the fine-tuning problem the Higgs sector of the standard model seems to suffer, new physics should have appeared already in the last LHC run. Thus, the persistence of fine-tuning has originated numerous works exploring both, the limits and the different conceptual definitions of naturalness. However, little work has been done re-examining precisely one of the main pillars naturalness advocates: its historical successes. Given the current period in which the critics to the naturalness principle are undergoing, we find important to explore in detail the historical examples often cited, primarily the charm quark proposal and its mass prediction, and see how can this contribute to the debate.

魅力夸克作为一种自然的成功
不可否认,在过去的几十年里,自然性原理在粒子物理学中发挥了重要作用,特别是在模型构建中。如今,人们可以找到各种不同的定义。其中一些似乎是相互排斥的,但传统上,它的概念一直与微调问题有关。将自然理解为微调问题必须消失的强制,例如,由于新粒子的存在,建立了基于超对称的新模型。为了缓和标准模型的希格斯区似乎遭受的微调问题,在上一次大型强子对撞机运行中应该已经出现了新的物理学。因此,微调的持续产生了许多探索自然的极限和不同概念定义的作品。然而,很少有人对自然倡导的主要支柱之一——历史上的成功——进行重新审视。鉴于对自然性原则的批评正在经历的当前时期,我们认为有必要详细探讨经常被引用的历史例子,主要是粲夸克提议及其质量预测,并看看这对辩论有何贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics
Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 物理-科学史与科学哲学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics is devoted to all aspects of the history and philosophy of modern physics broadly understood, including physical aspects of astronomy, chemistry and other non-biological sciences. The primary focus is on physics from the mid/late-nineteenth century to the present, the period of emergence of the kind of theoretical physics that has come to dominate the exact sciences in the twentieth century. The journal is internationally oriented with contributions from a wide range of perspectives. In addition to purely historical or philosophical papers, the editors particularly encourage papers that combine these two disciplines. The editors are also keen to publish papers of interest to physicists, as well as specialists in history and philosophy of physics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信