{"title":"The charm quark as a naturalness success","authors":"Miguel Ángel Carretero Sahuquillo","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Undeniably, the naturalness principle has had a major role in particle physics during the last decades, in particular in model building. Nowadays, one can find a wide range of different definitions. Some of them seem mutually exclusive, but traditionally, its notion has been linked to the fine-tuning problem. Understanding naturalness as the imposition that fine-tuning problems have to vanish, for instance, due to the existence of new particles, new models as those based in </span>supersymmetry<span> were built. In order to palliate the fine-tuning problem the Higgs sector of the standard model<span> seems to suffer, new physics should have appeared already in the last LHC run. Thus, the persistence of fine-tuning has originated numerous works exploring both, the limits and the different conceptual definitions of naturalness. However, little work has been done re-examining precisely one of the main pillars naturalness advocates: its historical successes. Given the current period in which the critics to the naturalness principle are undergoing, we find important to explore in detail the historical examples often cited, primarily the charm quark proposal and its mass prediction, and see how can this contribute to the debate.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":54442,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics","volume":"68 ","pages":"Pages 51-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.06.003","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355219818301102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Undeniably, the naturalness principle has had a major role in particle physics during the last decades, in particular in model building. Nowadays, one can find a wide range of different definitions. Some of them seem mutually exclusive, but traditionally, its notion has been linked to the fine-tuning problem. Understanding naturalness as the imposition that fine-tuning problems have to vanish, for instance, due to the existence of new particles, new models as those based in supersymmetry were built. In order to palliate the fine-tuning problem the Higgs sector of the standard model seems to suffer, new physics should have appeared already in the last LHC run. Thus, the persistence of fine-tuning has originated numerous works exploring both, the limits and the different conceptual definitions of naturalness. However, little work has been done re-examining precisely one of the main pillars naturalness advocates: its historical successes. Given the current period in which the critics to the naturalness principle are undergoing, we find important to explore in detail the historical examples often cited, primarily the charm quark proposal and its mass prediction, and see how can this contribute to the debate.
期刊介绍:
Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics is devoted to all aspects of the history and philosophy of modern physics broadly understood, including physical aspects of astronomy, chemistry and other non-biological sciences. The primary focus is on physics from the mid/late-nineteenth century to the present, the period of emergence of the kind of theoretical physics that has come to dominate the exact sciences in the twentieth century. The journal is internationally oriented with contributions from a wide range of perspectives. In addition to purely historical or philosophical papers, the editors particularly encourage papers that combine these two disciplines.
The editors are also keen to publish papers of interest to physicists, as well as specialists in history and philosophy of physics.