Impact of Ambulatory Care Pharmacist-Led Management on Hemoglobin A1c Values among Patients with Uncontrolled Diabetes in a Primary Care Clinic vs Usual Care over Two Years.

Innovations in Pharmacy Pub Date : 2023-10-10 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.24926/iip.v14i1.5444
Insaf Mohammad, Alyssa Poyer, Roukia Hamoud, Julie George
{"title":"Impact of Ambulatory Care Pharmacist-Led Management on Hemoglobin A1c Values among Patients with Uncontrolled Diabetes in a Primary Care Clinic vs Usual Care over Two Years.","authors":"Insaf Mohammad, Alyssa Poyer, Roukia Hamoud, Julie George","doi":"10.24926/iip.v14i1.5444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background: Literature has shown the positive impact of ambulatory care pharmacists on diabetes management, yet additional research on clinical outcomes compared to traditional care models is warranted. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of an ambulatory care pharmacist on glycemic control over two years compared to patients who received usual care. Methods: This retrospective cohort study matched patients with a baseline hemoglobin A1c (HgbA1c) ≥8% managed by the ambulatory care pharmacist to patients who received usual care. The primary outcome was the mean change in HgbA1c over two years. The secondary outcomes were to evaluate the difference in (1) the proportion of patients achieving HgbA1c <8%, (2) the proportion of patients achieving blood pressure <130/80 mmHg, (3) mean LDL, (4) the proportion of patients prescribed SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1RA, and sulfonylureas, and (5) severe hypoglycemia after two years. Results: Data for 180 patients was analyzed over two years. The mean HgbA1c was 10% at baseline vs 8.2% after two years (adjusted mean change -1.92) among pharmacist-managed patients, compared to 9.9% vs 9% respectively for usual care patients (adjusted mean change -0.98) (p=0.004). Among pharmacist-managed patients, 53.5% achieved HgbA1c <8% compared with 34.2% of usual care patients (p=0.014). There were no statistically significant differences in proportion of patients at goal blood pressure, mean LDL, or hypoglycemia between the two groups. After two years, 18.3% of pharmacist-managed and 5.8% of usual care patients were on an SGLT2 inhibitor (p=0.008), and 46.7% of pharmacist-managed and 9.2% of usual care patients were on a GLP-1RA (p<0.001). No difference was found in sulfonylurea utilization. Conclusion: Patients with HgbA1c >8% managed by an ambulatory care pharmacist had twice the HgbA1c reduction and significantly more utilization of GLP-1RA and SGLT2 inhibitors as compared to controls provided usual care.","PeriodicalId":13646,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10686668/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v14i1.5444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Literature has shown the positive impact of ambulatory care pharmacists on diabetes management, yet additional research on clinical outcomes compared to traditional care models is warranted. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of an ambulatory care pharmacist on glycemic control over two years compared to patients who received usual care. Methods: This retrospective cohort study matched patients with a baseline hemoglobin A1c (HgbA1c) ≥8% managed by the ambulatory care pharmacist to patients who received usual care. The primary outcome was the mean change in HgbA1c over two years. The secondary outcomes were to evaluate the difference in (1) the proportion of patients achieving HgbA1c <8%, (2) the proportion of patients achieving blood pressure <130/80 mmHg, (3) mean LDL, (4) the proportion of patients prescribed SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1RA, and sulfonylureas, and (5) severe hypoglycemia after two years. Results: Data for 180 patients was analyzed over two years. The mean HgbA1c was 10% at baseline vs 8.2% after two years (adjusted mean change -1.92) among pharmacist-managed patients, compared to 9.9% vs 9% respectively for usual care patients (adjusted mean change -0.98) (p=0.004). Among pharmacist-managed patients, 53.5% achieved HgbA1c <8% compared with 34.2% of usual care patients (p=0.014). There were no statistically significant differences in proportion of patients at goal blood pressure, mean LDL, or hypoglycemia between the two groups. After two years, 18.3% of pharmacist-managed and 5.8% of usual care patients were on an SGLT2 inhibitor (p=0.008), and 46.7% of pharmacist-managed and 9.2% of usual care patients were on a GLP-1RA (p<0.001). No difference was found in sulfonylurea utilization. Conclusion: Patients with HgbA1c >8% managed by an ambulatory care pharmacist had twice the HgbA1c reduction and significantly more utilization of GLP-1RA and SGLT2 inhibitors as compared to controls provided usual care.
门诊药师主导的管理对初级保健诊所与常规护理两年内未控制糖尿病患者血红蛋白A1c值的影响
背景:文献已经显示门诊药师对糖尿病管理的积极影响,但与传统护理模式相比,临床结果的进一步研究是有必要的。目的:本研究的目的是评估门诊药师在两年内对血糖控制的影响,与接受常规护理的患者相比。方法:本回顾性队列研究将门诊药师管理的基线血红蛋白A1c (HgbA1c)≥8%的患者与接受常规护理的患者进行匹配。主要终点是两年内糖化血红蛋白的平均变化。次要结果是评估(1)达到HgbA1c的患者比例的差异。结果:对180例患者的数据进行了两年的分析。在药剂师管理的患者中,基线时的平均糖化血红蛋白为10%,两年后为8.2%(调整平均变化-1.92),而常规护理患者的平均糖化血红蛋白为9.9%,两年后分别为9%(调整平均变化-0.98)(p=0.004)。在药剂师管理的患者中,53.5%的患者达到了糖化血红蛋白水平。结论:与常规护理的对照组相比,由门诊药剂师管理的糖化血红蛋白>8%的患者糖化血红蛋白水平降低了两倍,GLP-1RA和SGLT2抑制剂的使用率显著提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信