A Feasibility Pilot Study to Assess the Efficacy of NavX Guided Detection of Pulmonary Vein Electrograms during Atrial Fibrillation Ablation [NavX Guided Detection of Pulmonary Vein Electrograms]

Y. Khaykin, P. Alipour, Meysam Pirbaglou, P. Ritvo, Z. Azizi, Z. Wulffhart, B. Whaley, David Giewercer, K. Winger, A. Verma
{"title":"A Feasibility Pilot Study to Assess the Efficacy of NavX Guided Detection of Pulmonary Vein Electrograms during Atrial Fibrillation Ablation [NavX Guided Detection of Pulmonary Vein Electrograms]","authors":"Y. Khaykin, P. Alipour, Meysam Pirbaglou, P. Ritvo, Z. Azizi, Z. Wulffhart, B. Whaley, David Giewercer, K. Winger, A. Verma","doi":"10.23937/2378-2951/1410102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pulmonary Vein Antrum Isolation (PVAI) targeting PV triggers is an established treatment for paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (AF). Ablation lesions are typically delivered around the entire circumference of each individual PV. This study tested a strategy where electrical inputs to the PVs were mapped using the NavX system and selectively targeted before ablation. The objectives of the study were to evaluate: 1) Likelihood of PV isolation using this strategy, 2) Correlation between manually tagged PV potentials and Complex Fractionated Electrograms identified using the NavX CFE Mean Map in sinus rhythm and during coronary sinus pacing, 3) Long term success of this strategy. Methods: Ablation was initially guided by identification of PV antral regions activating early in sinus rhythm and during Coronary Sinus (CS) pacing, and exhibiting local fractionated electrograms, mapped using the NavX system, and a circular mapping catheter. If PV isolation could not be established using this approach, it was completed using the conventional ablation approach. For analysis each vein was divided into quadrants from 12 o’clock looking from the Left Atrium (LA) into the vein. Manually identified fractionated potentials were compared with the NavX Complex Fractionated Electrogram (CFE) Mean map acquired in sinus rhythm and during coronary sinus pacing. CFE Mean Map parameters were set to a Width of 20 ms, Refractory of 30 ms, and P-P sensitivity of 0.05 mV. Manually tagged PV potentials were used as the gold standard. AF recurrences were assessed using ambulatory monitoring at 1, 3, 6 & 12 months post ablation. Results: Twenty consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF (age 59 ± 10 y, 60% male, LA 40 ± 6 mm) were enrolled in the study. Distribution of CFE closely paralleled activation. In addition, CFE were identified on the septum in sinus rhythm in 60% of the patients and on the posterior wall during CS pacing in 35% of the patients. The sensitivity-specificity of the auto-identified CFE that predicted manually tagged fractionated potentials were 60%-68% in Sinus Rhythm (SR), and 80%-70% during CS pacing. Mapping and ablation fluoroscopy time was 30 ± 12 min with Radio Frequency (RF) time of 27 ± 10 min. Completion of PVAI required an additional 22 ± 16 min of fluoroscopy and 31 ± 28 min of RF energy delivery. Total procedure time was 209 ± 36 min. Only 13 (4%) of all PV quadrants in n = 5 (25%) patients did not have to be ablated to achieve PVAI. Three patients (15%) had AF recurrences between the first 3 months and 12 months following ablation. Two of these patients cumulatively had 7 of the 13 non-ablated quadrants in the study. Conclusions: While mapping earliest PV activation during sinus rhythm and CS stimulation is feasible, ablation guided by this approach may avoid unnecessary RF energy delivery in only a small proportion of the PV antral segments, potentially leading to higher ablation failure rates. NavX CFE mean algorithm accurately identifies areas of fractionation at PV antra during sinus rhythm and distal CS stimulation corresponding to PV potentials.","PeriodicalId":15510,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Cardiology","volume":"94 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-2951/1410102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary Vein Antrum Isolation (PVAI) targeting PV triggers is an established treatment for paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (AF). Ablation lesions are typically delivered around the entire circumference of each individual PV. This study tested a strategy where electrical inputs to the PVs were mapped using the NavX system and selectively targeted before ablation. The objectives of the study were to evaluate: 1) Likelihood of PV isolation using this strategy, 2) Correlation between manually tagged PV potentials and Complex Fractionated Electrograms identified using the NavX CFE Mean Map in sinus rhythm and during coronary sinus pacing, 3) Long term success of this strategy. Methods: Ablation was initially guided by identification of PV antral regions activating early in sinus rhythm and during Coronary Sinus (CS) pacing, and exhibiting local fractionated electrograms, mapped using the NavX system, and a circular mapping catheter. If PV isolation could not be established using this approach, it was completed using the conventional ablation approach. For analysis each vein was divided into quadrants from 12 o’clock looking from the Left Atrium (LA) into the vein. Manually identified fractionated potentials were compared with the NavX Complex Fractionated Electrogram (CFE) Mean map acquired in sinus rhythm and during coronary sinus pacing. CFE Mean Map parameters were set to a Width of 20 ms, Refractory of 30 ms, and P-P sensitivity of 0.05 mV. Manually tagged PV potentials were used as the gold standard. AF recurrences were assessed using ambulatory monitoring at 1, 3, 6 & 12 months post ablation. Results: Twenty consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF (age 59 ± 10 y, 60% male, LA 40 ± 6 mm) were enrolled in the study. Distribution of CFE closely paralleled activation. In addition, CFE were identified on the septum in sinus rhythm in 60% of the patients and on the posterior wall during CS pacing in 35% of the patients. The sensitivity-specificity of the auto-identified CFE that predicted manually tagged fractionated potentials were 60%-68% in Sinus Rhythm (SR), and 80%-70% during CS pacing. Mapping and ablation fluoroscopy time was 30 ± 12 min with Radio Frequency (RF) time of 27 ± 10 min. Completion of PVAI required an additional 22 ± 16 min of fluoroscopy and 31 ± 28 min of RF energy delivery. Total procedure time was 209 ± 36 min. Only 13 (4%) of all PV quadrants in n = 5 (25%) patients did not have to be ablated to achieve PVAI. Three patients (15%) had AF recurrences between the first 3 months and 12 months following ablation. Two of these patients cumulatively had 7 of the 13 non-ablated quadrants in the study. Conclusions: While mapping earliest PV activation during sinus rhythm and CS stimulation is feasible, ablation guided by this approach may avoid unnecessary RF energy delivery in only a small proportion of the PV antral segments, potentially leading to higher ablation failure rates. NavX CFE mean algorithm accurately identifies areas of fractionation at PV antra during sinus rhythm and distal CS stimulation corresponding to PV potentials.
评估心房颤动消融过程中NavX引导肺静脉电图检测效果的可行性初步研究[NavX引导肺静脉电图检测]
背景:针对PV触发器的肺静脉腔隔离(PVAI)是治疗阵发性心房颤动(AF)的既定治疗方法。消融病灶通常在每个单独PV的整个周长周围进行。本研究测试了一种策略,使用NavX系统对pv的电输入进行映射,并在消融前选择性地靶向。本研究的目的是评估:1)使用该策略分离PV的可能性;2)人工标记PV电位与使用NavX CFE平均图在窦性心律和冠状窦起搏期间识别的复杂分段电图之间的相关性;3)该策略的长期成功。方法:消融最初是通过识别窦性心律早期和冠状窦(CS)起搏期间激活的PV中心区域,并显示局部分形电图,使用NavX系统和圆形测绘导管进行测绘。如果该方法无法建立PV隔离,则使用常规烧蚀方法完成。为了进行分析,将每条静脉从12点钟方向从左心房(LA)进入静脉划分为象限。将人工识别的分割电位与窦性心律和冠状窦起搏期间获得的NavX复合分割电位(CFE)平均图进行比较。CFE Mean Map参数设置为宽度为20 ms,耐火度为30 ms, P-P灵敏度为0.05 mV。人工标记PV电位作为金标准。消融后1、3、6和12个月通过动态监测评估房颤复发情况。结果:连续20例阵发性房颤患者(年龄59±10岁,男性60%,LA 40±6 mm)入组研究。CFE的分布与活化密切平行。此外,60%的患者在窦性心律时在隔膜上发现CFE, 35%的患者在CS起搏时在后壁上发现CFE。自动识别的CFE预测人工标记的分割电位的敏感性特异性在窦性心律(SR)中为60%-68%,在CS起搏时为80%-70%。定位和消融透视时间为30±12分钟,射频(RF)时间为27±10分钟。完成PVAI需要额外的22±16分钟透视和31±28分钟射频能量输送。总手术时间为209±36分钟。在n = 5(25%)例患者中,只有13例(4%)PV象限不需要消融以实现PVAI。3例患者(15%)在消融后的前3个月至12个月内房颤复发。其中两名患者在研究中累积有13个未消融象限中的7个。结论:虽然在窦性心律和CS刺激期间绘制最早的PV激活是可行的,但这种方法指导下的消融可能只会避免一小部分PV窦段不必要的射频能量输送,这可能导致更高的消融失败率。NavX CFE均值算法准确识别窦性心律时PV窦腔的分割区域和远端CS刺激与PV电位相对应的分割区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信