Risk-Based Analysis and Engineering of Safe Distances Between Occupied Structures and Processing Equipment

J. Johnstone, M. D. Spangler, C. Heitzman, G. A. Wimberley, A. R. Flores
{"title":"Risk-Based Analysis and Engineering of Safe Distances Between Occupied Structures and Processing Equipment","authors":"J. Johnstone, M. D. Spangler, C. Heitzman, G. A. Wimberley, A. R. Flores","doi":"10.2118/173507-PA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"API RP 752 (2009) allows for the evaluation of building locations to use three different assessment approaches: 1. Consequence-based analysis: This approach generally requires that the impacts from maximum credible events (MCEs) be calculated or modeled to determine the impact on a structure. 2. Risk-based analysis: Use of risk-based analysis involves conducting a quantitative analysis to determine risk on the basis of the consequence and the frequency of the hazardous event. 3. Spacing-tables approach: Under API RP 752 (2009), the spacing-table approach is to be used only when determining the minimum distance from a fire to a building. These tables are not appropriate for toxic or explosive events for which the consequence is dependent on the release rate, length of release, wind direction, material released, and many other factors. API RP 752 (2009) was developed primarily for use at facilities that include natural-gas plants, natural-gas-liquefication plants, and other onshore facilities covered by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) process-safety management standard (OSHA 1992). API RP 752 (2009) provides an excellent overview of the issues and factors regarding hazards associated with buildings and provides references as to where additional information can be obtained. The recommended practice does not provide information relating to an oil-production or a gas-treatment facility, detailing out critical items such as MCEs, impacts from hazardous incidents, acceptatble risk criteria, and risk analaysis. The objective of this paper is to present a detailed approach that can serve as the basis for determining safe distances between buildings and processing equipment.","PeriodicalId":19446,"journal":{"name":"Oil and gas facilities","volume":"23 1","pages":"48-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oil and gas facilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/173507-PA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

API RP 752 (2009) allows for the evaluation of building locations to use three different assessment approaches: 1. Consequence-based analysis: This approach generally requires that the impacts from maximum credible events (MCEs) be calculated or modeled to determine the impact on a structure. 2. Risk-based analysis: Use of risk-based analysis involves conducting a quantitative analysis to determine risk on the basis of the consequence and the frequency of the hazardous event. 3. Spacing-tables approach: Under API RP 752 (2009), the spacing-table approach is to be used only when determining the minimum distance from a fire to a building. These tables are not appropriate for toxic or explosive events for which the consequence is dependent on the release rate, length of release, wind direction, material released, and many other factors. API RP 752 (2009) was developed primarily for use at facilities that include natural-gas plants, natural-gas-liquefication plants, and other onshore facilities covered by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) process-safety management standard (OSHA 1992). API RP 752 (2009) provides an excellent overview of the issues and factors regarding hazards associated with buildings and provides references as to where additional information can be obtained. The recommended practice does not provide information relating to an oil-production or a gas-treatment facility, detailing out critical items such as MCEs, impacts from hazardous incidents, acceptatble risk criteria, and risk analaysis. The objective of this paper is to present a detailed approach that can serve as the basis for determining safe distances between buildings and processing equipment.
基于风险的被占用结构与加工设备之间安全距离分析与工程
API RP 752(2009)允许使用三种不同的评估方法对建筑位置进行评估:1。基于结果的分析:这种方法通常需要对最大可信事件(mce)的影响进行计算或建模,以确定对结构的影响。2. 基于风险的分析:使用基于风险的分析包括进行定量分析,根据危险事件的后果和频率来确定风险。3.间隔表法:根据API RP 752(2009),间隔表法仅用于确定从火灾到建筑物的最小距离。这些表不适用于毒性或爆炸性事件,因为其后果取决于释放速率、释放长度、风向、释放的物质和许多其他因素。API RP 752(2009)主要用于包括天然气厂、天然气液化厂和职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)过程安全管理标准(OSHA 1992)所涵盖的其他陆上设施。API RP 752(2009)对与建筑物相关的危险问题和因素提供了很好的概述,并提供了从哪里可以获得额外信息的参考。推荐的做法没有提供与石油生产或气体处理设施相关的信息,没有详细说明关键项目,如mce、危险事件的影响、可接受的风险标准和风险分析。本文的目的是提出一种详细的方法,可以作为确定建筑物和加工设备之间安全距离的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信