Characterization of Bondline Thickness Effects in Adhesive Joints

J. Tomblin, P. Harter, W. Seneviratne, C. Yang
{"title":"Characterization of Bondline Thickness Effects in Adhesive Joints","authors":"J. Tomblin, P. Harter, W. Seneviratne, C. Yang","doi":"10.1520/CTR10562J","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Growing application of composite materials in airframe structures tends to make significant use of bonded constructions. Despite the large work that has been done on adhesive characterization over previous years, various certification-related issues arise in these applications. The available test methods for determining the in situ properties of an adhesive joint for use in the design must be clarified for thick bondlines, where there is a lack of readily available data. Results from three test methods indicated a decrease in the apparent shear strength as the bondline thickness was increased. The apparent shear strength given by the test methods investigated was found to be highly dependent on the adherend bending stiffness, which directly effects the peel stress distributions in the adhesive layer. In the adhesive strength comparisons as a function of test method, it was found that the thin-adherend tests gave different comparative results than the thick-adherend tests, which were primarily a function of the high peel stresses in the thin-adherend joints. This combined state of stress does not give a true view of the apparent shear stress of the adhesive, but rather an indication of the adhesive behavior under this type of combined loading. It is recommended that thick adherends be used when comparing different adhesive systems for apparent shear strength, and that thin adherends should be used for qualitative tests only.","PeriodicalId":15514,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Composites Technology & Research","volume":"93 1","pages":"332-344"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Composites Technology & Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1520/CTR10562J","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Growing application of composite materials in airframe structures tends to make significant use of bonded constructions. Despite the large work that has been done on adhesive characterization over previous years, various certification-related issues arise in these applications. The available test methods for determining the in situ properties of an adhesive joint for use in the design must be clarified for thick bondlines, where there is a lack of readily available data. Results from three test methods indicated a decrease in the apparent shear strength as the bondline thickness was increased. The apparent shear strength given by the test methods investigated was found to be highly dependent on the adherend bending stiffness, which directly effects the peel stress distributions in the adhesive layer. In the adhesive strength comparisons as a function of test method, it was found that the thin-adherend tests gave different comparative results than the thick-adherend tests, which were primarily a function of the high peel stresses in the thin-adherend joints. This combined state of stress does not give a true view of the apparent shear stress of the adhesive, but rather an indication of the adhesive behavior under this type of combined loading. It is recommended that thick adherends be used when comparing different adhesive systems for apparent shear strength, and that thin adherends should be used for qualitative tests only.
粘结接头中粘结线厚度效应的表征
随着复合材料在飞机结构中的应用越来越广泛,粘结结构的应用越来越广泛。尽管在过去的几年里,在粘合剂表征方面已经做了大量的工作,但在这些应用中出现了各种与认证相关的问题。对于缺乏现成数据的厚粘合线,必须明确用于确定设计中使用的粘合接头的原位性能的现有测试方法。三种试验方法的结果表明,随着粘结线厚度的增加,表观抗剪强度降低。所研究的试验方法给出的表观抗剪强度高度依赖于胶粘剂的弯曲刚度,它直接影响胶粘剂层的剥离应力分布。在作为试验方法函数的粘接强度比较中,发现薄粘接试验给出了与厚粘接试验不同的比较结果,这主要是薄粘接接头中高剥离应力的函数。这种组合的应力状态并不能给出胶粘剂的表观剪切应力的真实视图,而是在这种类型的组合载荷下胶粘剂行为的指示。建议在比较不同胶粘剂体系的表观抗剪强度时使用厚胶粘剂,而薄胶粘剂应仅用于定性试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信