Characterization of Village Chicken Production and Breeding Practices of Smallholders in Eastern Ethiopia

Q4 Veterinary
B. Asmelash, M. Dawit, E. Kebede
{"title":"Characterization of Village Chicken Production and Breeding Practices of Smallholders in Eastern Ethiopia","authors":"B. Asmelash, M. Dawit, E. Kebede","doi":"10.4172/2157-7579.1000507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study was conducted in Eastern Ethiopian districts of Oromia regional State such as Meta, Deder, Goro Gutu, Babile, and Jigjiga districts of Somali regional state. So far in Eastern Ethiopia, very little effort has been made in characterization of village chicken production, husbandry and identification of smallholder’s trait selections. Therefore, this study was initiated with the aim of characterization of village chicken production, husbandry, breeding practices and identification of smallholder’s trait selection in Eastern Ethiopia. Majority (42.29%) of respondents maintained large proportion of layers in the flock in the study area. The village chicken production of the study districts were characterized by poor management which used scavenging system as major feed resources (99%), no appropriate house (93.3%), no regular vaccination (100%) and uncontrolled breeding. The mean annual egg production of the village chicken of the districts was estimated at 51.66 in an average of 3.69 production cycles a year. All smallholders in the study area keep chickens principally for cash income more important than egg and meat production for home consumption. Moreover, majority of respondents get benefit (31.74%) from chicken manure through application as a fertilizer for garden vegetable production in their backwards. The respondents (89%) confirmed that “Fengil” (New castle disease), “Albasa” (Coccidiosis) and “Kinkin” (External parasites) are the serious disease outbreak results in complete devastation of the flock. Most stallholders ranked first the egg size birds laying (0.412) and second reproduction performances (0.276) among their selection criteria’s. Only few respondents (35%) reared their own cock for a breeding purpose and majority had no breeding experience in improving their chicken productivity.","PeriodicalId":36826,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Veterinary Science and Technology","volume":"42 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Veterinary Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7579.1000507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The study was conducted in Eastern Ethiopian districts of Oromia regional State such as Meta, Deder, Goro Gutu, Babile, and Jigjiga districts of Somali regional state. So far in Eastern Ethiopia, very little effort has been made in characterization of village chicken production, husbandry and identification of smallholder’s trait selections. Therefore, this study was initiated with the aim of characterization of village chicken production, husbandry, breeding practices and identification of smallholder’s trait selection in Eastern Ethiopia. Majority (42.29%) of respondents maintained large proportion of layers in the flock in the study area. The village chicken production of the study districts were characterized by poor management which used scavenging system as major feed resources (99%), no appropriate house (93.3%), no regular vaccination (100%) and uncontrolled breeding. The mean annual egg production of the village chicken of the districts was estimated at 51.66 in an average of 3.69 production cycles a year. All smallholders in the study area keep chickens principally for cash income more important than egg and meat production for home consumption. Moreover, majority of respondents get benefit (31.74%) from chicken manure through application as a fertilizer for garden vegetable production in their backwards. The respondents (89%) confirmed that “Fengil” (New castle disease), “Albasa” (Coccidiosis) and “Kinkin” (External parasites) are the serious disease outbreak results in complete devastation of the flock. Most stallholders ranked first the egg size birds laying (0.412) and second reproduction performances (0.276) among their selection criteria’s. Only few respondents (35%) reared their own cock for a breeding purpose and majority had no breeding experience in improving their chicken productivity.
埃塞俄比亚东部乡村鸡生产和小农养殖实践的特征
该研究是在奥罗米亚地区州的埃塞俄比亚东部地区进行的,如索马里地区州的Meta、Deder、Goro Gutu、Babile和Jigjiga地区。到目前为止,在埃塞俄比亚东部,对乡村鸡的生产、饲养和小农的性状选择进行鉴定的工作很少。因此,本研究旨在对埃塞俄比亚东部的乡村鸡生产、饲养、育种实践和小农的性状选择进行表征。大多数(42.29%)的调查对象在研究区域保持了较大比例的鸡群。研究区村鸡生产存在以扫食系统为主要饲料资源(99%)、无适宜鸡舍(93.3%)、不定期接种(100%)和饲养不受控制等管理不善的特点。各区村鸡年平均产蛋量为51.66只,平均每年3.69个生产周期。研究区域的所有小农养鸡主要是为了获得现金收入,而不是为了家庭消费而生产蛋类和肉类。此外,大多数受访者(31.74%)通过将鸡粪作为肥料施用于其后方的花园蔬菜生产中获得效益。答复者(89%)确认“Fengil”(新堡病)、“Albasa”(球虫病)和“Kinkin”(外部寄生虫)是导致鸡群完全毁灭的严重疾病暴发。大多数摊贩的选择标准是蛋大小第一(0.412),繁殖性能第二(0.276)。只有少数应答者(35%)为繁殖目的饲养自己的公鸡,大多数人没有提高鸡产量的饲养经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信