Tweeting on Presidential Coattails: Congressional Candidate Use of Twitter in the 2020 Elections

Evan Crawford, Mikaela Foehr, Nathaniel Yee
{"title":"Tweeting on Presidential Coattails: Congressional Candidate Use of Twitter in the 2020 Elections","authors":"Evan Crawford, Mikaela Foehr, Nathaniel Yee","doi":"10.51685/jqd.2022.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a long history of political science research focused on congressional candidates riding presidential coattails into office. The underlying theory for this potential relationship is relatively simple—when presidential nominees are popular, they can help bolster the electoral fortunes of their down-ballot, co-partisan candidates. If this is right, congressional candidates should be incentivized to publicly align themselves with their co-partisan presidential nominee, albeit in strategic ways. We look for this relationship by constructing an original dataset of congressional candidate Twitter data and identifying the extent to which candidates mention presidential nominees during the 2020 campaign, a behavior we call “tweeting on coattails.” Our data allow us to describe relationships between “tweeting on coattails”, candidate party ID, and district-level electoral conditions. We find that overall, challengers tweeted more than incumbents, but incumbents were more likely to “tweet on coattails.” In addition, candidates of both parties “tweeted on coattails” more frequently if they were running in a district where their party’s nominee is popular. This relationship was not symmetric in magnitude, however, as Republicans were significantly more likely to tweet about Donald Trump than Democrats were to tweet about Joe Biden.","PeriodicalId":93587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quantitative description: digital media","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of quantitative description: digital media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2022.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a long history of political science research focused on congressional candidates riding presidential coattails into office. The underlying theory for this potential relationship is relatively simple—when presidential nominees are popular, they can help bolster the electoral fortunes of their down-ballot, co-partisan candidates. If this is right, congressional candidates should be incentivized to publicly align themselves with their co-partisan presidential nominee, albeit in strategic ways. We look for this relationship by constructing an original dataset of congressional candidate Twitter data and identifying the extent to which candidates mention presidential nominees during the 2020 campaign, a behavior we call “tweeting on coattails.” Our data allow us to describe relationships between “tweeting on coattails”, candidate party ID, and district-level electoral conditions. We find that overall, challengers tweeted more than incumbents, but incumbents were more likely to “tweet on coattails.” In addition, candidates of both parties “tweeted on coattails” more frequently if they were running in a district where their party’s nominee is popular. This relationship was not symmetric in magnitude, however, as Republicans were significantly more likely to tweet about Donald Trump than Democrats were to tweet about Joe Biden.
在总统的尾巴上发推特:国会候选人在2020年选举中使用推特
长期以来,政治科学研究都把重点放在了国会候选人的竞选上。这种潜在关系的基本理论相对简单——当总统候选人很受欢迎时,他们可以帮助支持选票较少的党派候选人的选举运气。如果这是正确的,国会候选人应该受到激励,公开与他们的共同党派总统候选人结盟,尽管是以战略方式。我们通过构建国会候选人推特数据的原始数据集来寻找这种关系,并确定候选人在2020年竞选期间提到总统候选人的程度,我们称之为“推尾巴”。我们的数据使我们能够描述“推特”、候选人政党ID和地区级选举条件之间的关系。我们发现,总体而言,挑战者比在职者发推文更多,但在职者更有可能“发推文”。此外,如果两党候选人在本党候选人受欢迎的地区竞选,他们“发推特”的频率会更高。然而,这种关系在量级上不是对称的,因为共和党人发关于唐纳德·特朗普的推文的可能性明显高于民主党人发关于乔·拜登的推文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信