Challenges faced when teaching how to write a user scenario

Konstantinos Gkikas, D. Nathanael, N. Marmaras
{"title":"Challenges faced when teaching how to write a user scenario","authors":"Konstantinos Gkikas, D. Nathanael, N. Marmaras","doi":"10.1145/3121283.3121309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The importance of the scenarios in the user-centered design process of low complexity interactive systems is well documented in various academic and professional articles. The aim of this study is to reveal the undocumented properties that distinguish useful (rich) scenarios from uninteresting (poor) ones. Two student projects, involving scenario writing, were used to detect the aspects that define the quality of a user scenario. A total of 298 scenarios were individually and blindly graded by three experts in user-centered design and then analyzed following a grounded approach. A number of aspects that distinguish the \"rich\" from the \"poor\" scenarios were identified.","PeriodicalId":93284,"journal":{"name":"ECCE ... : proceedings of the ... European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ECCE ... : proceedings of the ... European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3121283.3121309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The importance of the scenarios in the user-centered design process of low complexity interactive systems is well documented in various academic and professional articles. The aim of this study is to reveal the undocumented properties that distinguish useful (rich) scenarios from uninteresting (poor) ones. Two student projects, involving scenario writing, were used to detect the aspects that define the quality of a user scenario. A total of 298 scenarios were individually and blindly graded by three experts in user-centered design and then analyzed following a grounded approach. A number of aspects that distinguish the "rich" from the "poor" scenarios were identified.
教授如何编写用户场景时面临的挑战
在以用户为中心的低复杂性交互系统设计过程中,场景的重要性在各种学术和专业文章中都有很好的记载。本研究的目的是揭示区分有用(丰富)场景和无趣(贫乏)场景的未记录属性。两个涉及场景写作的学生项目被用来检测定义用户场景质量的各个方面。共有298个场景由三位以用户为中心的设计专家分别盲目评分,然后按照一种接地气的方法进行分析。确定了区分“富裕”和“贫穷”情景的若干方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信