On the Dynamics of Structure, Power, and Interaction: A Case Study from a Software Developing Company

Trygve J. Steiro, Ragnar Vennatrø, J. Bergh, Glenn-Egil Torgersen
{"title":"On the Dynamics of Structure, Power, and Interaction: A Case Study from a Software Developing Company","authors":"Trygve J. Steiro, Ragnar Vennatrø, J. Bergh, Glenn-Egil Torgersen","doi":"10.53615/2232-5697.11.215-228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: In a dynamic world with high customer demands and volatile markets, organisations need to adapt to changes in context. Agile methods constitute a well-recognised framework for software companies. The current study looks into how these methods are applied and their perceived strengths. The problem formulation in the current study is: What are the experiences with agile methods? \nMethodology: In a dynamic world with high customer demands and volatile markets, organisations need to adapt to changes in context. Agile methods constitute a well-recognised framework for software companies. The current study looks into how these methods are applied and their perceived strengths. The problem formulation in the current study is: What are the experiences with agile methods \nFindings: Four themes emerged from the study concerning Empowerment in mastery and overview, Meaningfulness and job satisfaction as preconditions for learning, Transparency in processes facilitates psychological safety and learning, Imbalance in power between the programmers and the product owners: Lack of transparency. \nOriginality: These results are discussed in the study and presented in a conceptual model. We argue that transparency and meaningfulness play a central role in adapting and learning. The current study also investigates power aspects as both an enabling and disabling factor.","PeriodicalId":30485,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Knowledge and Learning","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Knowledge and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53615/2232-5697.11.215-228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: In a dynamic world with high customer demands and volatile markets, organisations need to adapt to changes in context. Agile methods constitute a well-recognised framework for software companies. The current study looks into how these methods are applied and their perceived strengths. The problem formulation in the current study is: What are the experiences with agile methods? Methodology: In a dynamic world with high customer demands and volatile markets, organisations need to adapt to changes in context. Agile methods constitute a well-recognised framework for software companies. The current study looks into how these methods are applied and their perceived strengths. The problem formulation in the current study is: What are the experiences with agile methods Findings: Four themes emerged from the study concerning Empowerment in mastery and overview, Meaningfulness and job satisfaction as preconditions for learning, Transparency in processes facilitates psychological safety and learning, Imbalance in power between the programmers and the product owners: Lack of transparency. Originality: These results are discussed in the study and presented in a conceptual model. We argue that transparency and meaningfulness play a central role in adapting and learning. The current study also investigates power aspects as both an enabling and disabling factor.
论结构、权力和互动的动力学:以一家软件开发公司为例
目的:在一个具有高客户需求和不稳定市场的动态世界中,组织需要适应环境的变化。敏捷方法构成了软件公司公认的框架。目前的研究着眼于如何应用这些方法以及它们的感知优势。当前研究中的问题表述是:敏捷方法的经验是什么?方法论:在一个客户需求高、市场波动大的动态世界中,组织需要适应环境的变化。敏捷方法构成了软件公司公认的框架。目前的研究着眼于如何应用这些方法以及它们的感知优势。研究发现:研究中出现了四个主题:掌握和概述的授权、学习的前提是意义和工作满意度、过程的透明度促进心理安全和学习、程序员和产品所有者之间的权力不平衡、缺乏透明度。原创性:这些结果在研究中进行了讨论,并以概念模型的形式呈现。我们认为,透明度和意义在适应和学习中起着核心作用。目前的研究还调查了权力方面作为一个使能因素和使能因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信