Patient Safety Competency and its Related Aspects in Professional Education among Nursing Students of Two Nursing Schools in Iran: A Comparative Study

Q2 Nursing
Jamileh Farokhzadian, Zahra Tayebi Myaneh, Sedigheh Khodabandeh Shahrakia, Alireza Malakoutikhah, Iman Nosratabadi, Farshid Rafiee Sarbijan-Nasab
{"title":"Patient Safety Competency and its Related Aspects in Professional Education among Nursing Students of Two Nursing Schools in Iran: A Comparative Study","authors":"Jamileh Farokhzadian, Zahra Tayebi Myaneh, Sedigheh Khodabandeh Shahrakia, Alireza Malakoutikhah, Iman Nosratabadi, Farshid Rafiee Sarbijan-Nasab","doi":"10.14710/nmjn.v12i2.42122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The importance of patient safety competency in nursing students to enter the clinical environment has made continuous studies necessary. However, only few studies have been conducted to assess and compare patient safety competency and its related aspects among nursing students in various settings.Purpose: This study aimed to compare patient safety competency and its related aspects among undergraduate nursing students of two nursing schools.Methods: This descriptive comparative study was conducted at two nursing schools (A and B) in Iran. Using a census method, 240 undergraduate nursing students were enrolled from group A and 200 ones from group B. In total, 377 students completed the survey (response rate = 76.60 %). Data were collected using the adapted Health Professional Education in Patient Safety Survey (H-PEPSS). Data were analyzed using SPSS (version 21) and running descriptive statistics and independent samples t- test. The significance level was set at p<0.05.  Results: Results showed that nursing students’ means (SD) of patient safety competency in classroom (3.43(0.60)) and clinical setting (3.32(0.62)) were significantly higher in Group A compared with Group B (2.66(0.90) and 2.39(0.9), respectively). The means of the broader aspects of patient safety and comfortable speaking up about patient safety were significantly lower in Group A than Group B (3.58(0.71) and 3.31(0.59)) versus (3.79(0.71) and 3.55(0.72)).Conclusion: Nursing students from two different nursing schools had varied levels of patient safety competency in the classroom and clinical settings. In addition, it was found that the participants had different perspectives on aspects of patient safety and perceptions of speaking up about patient safety (p<0.05).","PeriodicalId":36409,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Media Journal of Nursing","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Media Journal of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/nmjn.v12i2.42122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: The importance of patient safety competency in nursing students to enter the clinical environment has made continuous studies necessary. However, only few studies have been conducted to assess and compare patient safety competency and its related aspects among nursing students in various settings.Purpose: This study aimed to compare patient safety competency and its related aspects among undergraduate nursing students of two nursing schools.Methods: This descriptive comparative study was conducted at two nursing schools (A and B) in Iran. Using a census method, 240 undergraduate nursing students were enrolled from group A and 200 ones from group B. In total, 377 students completed the survey (response rate = 76.60 %). Data were collected using the adapted Health Professional Education in Patient Safety Survey (H-PEPSS). Data were analyzed using SPSS (version 21) and running descriptive statistics and independent samples t- test. The significance level was set at p<0.05.  Results: Results showed that nursing students’ means (SD) of patient safety competency in classroom (3.43(0.60)) and clinical setting (3.32(0.62)) were significantly higher in Group A compared with Group B (2.66(0.90) and 2.39(0.9), respectively). The means of the broader aspects of patient safety and comfortable speaking up about patient safety were significantly lower in Group A than Group B (3.58(0.71) and 3.31(0.59)) versus (3.79(0.71) and 3.55(0.72)).Conclusion: Nursing students from two different nursing schools had varied levels of patient safety competency in the classroom and clinical settings. In addition, it was found that the participants had different perspectives on aspects of patient safety and perceptions of speaking up about patient safety (p<0.05).
伊朗两所护理学校护理学生专业教育中患者安全能力及其相关方面的比较研究
背景:患者安全能力在护生进入临床环境中的重要性使得持续的研究成为必要。然而,只有很少的研究进行了评估和比较病人安全能力及其相关方面的护理学生在不同的设置。目的:比较两所护理学校本科护生的患者安全能力及其相关方面。方法:在伊朗的两所护理学校(A和B)进行描述性比较研究。采用人口普查法,a组招收护理本科生240名,b组招收护理本科生200名,共377名学生完成调查,回复率为76.60%。数据收集采用患者安全调查中的卫生专业教育(H-PEPSS)。数据分析采用SPSS (version 21)软件,采用描述性统计和独立样本t检验。显著性水平为p<0.05。结果:结果显示,A组护生课堂患者安全胜任力均值(3.43(0.60))和临床环境患者安全胜任力均值(3.32(0.62))显著高于B组(2.66(0.90)和2.39(0.9))。A组更广泛的患者安全方面的手段和舒适地谈论患者安全明显低于B组(3.58(0.71)和3.31(0.59))(3.79(0.71)和3.55(0.72))。结论:两所不同护理学校的护生在课堂和临床环境中的患者安全能力水平存在差异。此外,研究发现,参与者在患者安全方面的观点和对患者安全的看法不同(p<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nurse Media Journal of Nursing
Nurse Media Journal of Nursing Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信