Introducing the next generation sequencing in genomic amnio and villuos sampling. The so called "Next Generation Prenatal Diagnosis" (NGPD).

C. Giorlandino, A. Mesoraca, D. Bizzoco, C. Dello Russo, Antonella Cima, Gianluca Di Giacomo, P. Cignini, F. Padula, N. Dugo, L. D'emidio, C. Brizzi, R. Raffio, V. Milite, L. Mangiafico, C. Coco, O. Carcioppolo, R. Vigna, M. Mastrandrea, L. Mobili
{"title":"Introducing the next generation sequencing in genomic amnio and villuos sampling. The so called \"Next Generation Prenatal Diagnosis\" (NGPD).","authors":"C. Giorlandino, A. Mesoraca, D. Bizzoco, C. Dello Russo, Antonella Cima, Gianluca Di Giacomo, P. Cignini, F. Padula, N. Dugo, L. D'emidio, C. Brizzi, R. Raffio, V. Milite, L. Mangiafico, C. Coco, O. Carcioppolo, R. Vigna, M. Mastrandrea, L. Mobili","doi":"10.11138/JPM/2014.8.1.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last 30 years, invasive prenatal diagnosis has predominantly involved research into chromosomal anomalies, in particular Down’s Syndrome (1). In the last 10 years, parents have been requesting ever more information during pregnancy (2,3) and there has been an increase in the number of cases with ultrasound markers concerning possible fetal complications of unknown origin. This has led to the introduction of prenatal diagnosis and increasingly detailed techniques such as CGH Array (4-6). These techniques have become standard diagnostic practice in cases where the ultrasound scan provides a conflicting result. However, in reality, such procedures are thought to cover only 10% of the fetal anomalies linked to genetic malformations discovered at birth (7). Prenatal diagnosis is becoming more and more detailed due to the continual legal action taken by parents regarding diagnostic ultrasound which fails to identify fetal anomalies and regarding unwanted births in general (8-10). In fact, the continuous evolution of human genetics has led to the development of extremely detailed methodologies, which are able to evaluate not only the errors in chromosomes, both “big errors” (karyotype) and “small errors” (microdeletions, microduplications), but also gene mutations. To date, approximately 19,000 coding genes contained in the human exome have been identified. The recent introduction of NGS (Next Generation Sequencing) has made it possible, in theory, to explore the entire exome and reveal every form of mutation (11-15). Therefore, it is possible, today, to open up a completely new diagnostic scenario which would have been considered impossible only a few years ago. However, if this development is not controlled, it could lead to a so-called genetic “deviation”, i.e. a genetics that could have unforeseen repercussions on the life and dignity of the individual. In fact, the risks concerning possible social, emotional and financial consequences in the family and individual is very high. The potential negative impact of prenatal genetic testing must respect the “right not to know”. The exaggeration in ever more detailed testing concerning the genetic structure of the embryo creates tension within a family. In the future, this could create genetic discrimination regarding employment or health insurance costs (16,17). Despite the fact there is theoretically no technical limit to these methodologies, it is important to establish ethical and moral guidelines, at least regarding how these new methodologies are used in prenatal diagnosis.","PeriodicalId":89592,"journal":{"name":"Journal of prenatal medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of prenatal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11138/JPM/2014.8.1.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In the last 30 years, invasive prenatal diagnosis has predominantly involved research into chromosomal anomalies, in particular Down’s Syndrome (1). In the last 10 years, parents have been requesting ever more information during pregnancy (2,3) and there has been an increase in the number of cases with ultrasound markers concerning possible fetal complications of unknown origin. This has led to the introduction of prenatal diagnosis and increasingly detailed techniques such as CGH Array (4-6). These techniques have become standard diagnostic practice in cases where the ultrasound scan provides a conflicting result. However, in reality, such procedures are thought to cover only 10% of the fetal anomalies linked to genetic malformations discovered at birth (7). Prenatal diagnosis is becoming more and more detailed due to the continual legal action taken by parents regarding diagnostic ultrasound which fails to identify fetal anomalies and regarding unwanted births in general (8-10). In fact, the continuous evolution of human genetics has led to the development of extremely detailed methodologies, which are able to evaluate not only the errors in chromosomes, both “big errors” (karyotype) and “small errors” (microdeletions, microduplications), but also gene mutations. To date, approximately 19,000 coding genes contained in the human exome have been identified. The recent introduction of NGS (Next Generation Sequencing) has made it possible, in theory, to explore the entire exome and reveal every form of mutation (11-15). Therefore, it is possible, today, to open up a completely new diagnostic scenario which would have been considered impossible only a few years ago. However, if this development is not controlled, it could lead to a so-called genetic “deviation”, i.e. a genetics that could have unforeseen repercussions on the life and dignity of the individual. In fact, the risks concerning possible social, emotional and financial consequences in the family and individual is very high. The potential negative impact of prenatal genetic testing must respect the “right not to know”. The exaggeration in ever more detailed testing concerning the genetic structure of the embryo creates tension within a family. In the future, this could create genetic discrimination regarding employment or health insurance costs (16,17). Despite the fact there is theoretically no technical limit to these methodologies, it is important to establish ethical and moral guidelines, at least regarding how these new methodologies are used in prenatal diagnosis.
介绍下一代基因组测序在羊膜和绒毛取样中的应用。所谓的“下一代产前诊断”(NGPD)。
在过去的30年里,侵入性产前诊断主要涉及染色体异常的研究,特别是唐氏综合症(1)。在过去的10年里,父母在怀孕期间要求获得更多的信息(2,3),并且使用超声标记的病例数量增加了,这些病例可能涉及未知来源的胎儿并发症。这导致了产前诊断的引入和越来越详细的技术,如CGH阵列(4-6)。这些技术已经成为标准的诊断实践,在情况下,超声扫描提供矛盾的结果。然而,在现实中,这种程序被认为只覆盖了10%的与出生时发现的遗传畸形相关的胎儿异常(7)。产前诊断变得越来越详细,因为父母不断采取法律行动,诊断超声无法识别胎儿异常和一般的意外生育(8-10)。事实上,人类遗传学的不断进化导致了极其详细的方法的发展,这些方法不仅能够评估染色体上的错误,包括“大错误”(核型)和“小错误”(微缺失、微复制),而且还能够评估基因突变。迄今为止,人类外显子组中包含的大约19,000个编码基因已被确定。从理论上讲,最近引入的下一代测序技术(NGS)使探索整个外显子组并揭示每种形式的突变成为可能(11-15)。因此,今天有可能开辟一种仅仅在几年前还被认为是不可能的全新诊断方案。但是,如果这种发展不加以控制,就可能导致所谓的遗传“偏差”,即遗传可能对个人的生命和尊严产生不可预见的影响。事实上,对家庭和个人可能产生的社会、情感和经济后果的风险非常高。产前基因检测的潜在负面影响必须尊重“不知道的权利”。关于胚胎遗传结构的越来越详细的测试的夸张造成了家庭内部的紧张。在未来,这可能造成就业或医疗保险费用方面的遗传歧视(16,17)。尽管这些方法在理论上没有技术限制,但重要的是建立伦理和道德准则,至少是关于如何在产前诊断中使用这些新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信