Retrieval-induced forgetting in declarative and procedural memory: Inhibitory suppression resolves interference between motor responses

Dorothy R. Buchli
{"title":"Retrieval-induced forgetting in declarative and procedural memory: Inhibitory suppression resolves interference between motor responses","authors":"Dorothy R. Buchli","doi":"10.3389/fcogn.2022.1081181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over a century's worth of research suggests that, for a variety of verbal and perceptual memory phenomena, retrieval modifies memory in two ways. First, retrieved information is strengthened and thus more easily retrieved on subsequent recall tests. Secondly, when information is stored or organized in memory in such a way that multiple representations share a common retrieval cue, and are thus subject to interference, related information that is not retrieved becomes less recallable. Such retrieval-induced forgetting is a highly robust and well-understood phenomenon. Over the past decade, several experiments have demonstrated that retrieval-induced forgetting also persists for motor responses–both simple and complex, and that this impairment is observed for representations stored in both declarative and procedural memory. While several review papers have focused on retrieval-induced forgetting of verbal and perceptual information, to date no literature review has focused exclusively on retrieval-induced forgetting of motor responses or actions. In addition, while retrieval-induced forgetting has been documented extensively within the domain of declarative memory, only a few papers have been published documenting retrieval-induced forgetting in procedural memory. Therefore, this review paper will explore these findings and their primary implications, most notably that when multiple motor programs are initiated via a shared retrieval cue, inhibitory suppression is recruited to decrease accessibility of related, but inappropriate actions in service of potentiating retrieval of appropriate actions. More broadly, the same processes that govern selective retrieval in cognition are implicated in the selective retrieval of motor actions.","PeriodicalId":94013,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cognition","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcogn.2022.1081181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over a century's worth of research suggests that, for a variety of verbal and perceptual memory phenomena, retrieval modifies memory in two ways. First, retrieved information is strengthened and thus more easily retrieved on subsequent recall tests. Secondly, when information is stored or organized in memory in such a way that multiple representations share a common retrieval cue, and are thus subject to interference, related information that is not retrieved becomes less recallable. Such retrieval-induced forgetting is a highly robust and well-understood phenomenon. Over the past decade, several experiments have demonstrated that retrieval-induced forgetting also persists for motor responses–both simple and complex, and that this impairment is observed for representations stored in both declarative and procedural memory. While several review papers have focused on retrieval-induced forgetting of verbal and perceptual information, to date no literature review has focused exclusively on retrieval-induced forgetting of motor responses or actions. In addition, while retrieval-induced forgetting has been documented extensively within the domain of declarative memory, only a few papers have been published documenting retrieval-induced forgetting in procedural memory. Therefore, this review paper will explore these findings and their primary implications, most notably that when multiple motor programs are initiated via a shared retrieval cue, inhibitory suppression is recruited to decrease accessibility of related, but inappropriate actions in service of potentiating retrieval of appropriate actions. More broadly, the same processes that govern selective retrieval in cognition are implicated in the selective retrieval of motor actions.
陈述性和程序性记忆中的检索诱发遗忘:抑制抑制解决运动反应之间的干扰
一个多世纪的研究表明,对于各种语言和知觉记忆现象,检索以两种方式修改记忆。首先,检索到的信息得到强化,因此在随后的回忆测试中更容易检索到。其次,当信息以这样一种方式存储或组织在内存中,即多个表示共享一个公共检索线索,从而受到干扰时,未检索到的相关信息变得不那么可回忆。这种检索诱发的遗忘是一种非常强大且很容易理解的现象。在过去的十年里,一些实验已经证明,提取诱发的遗忘也存在于运动反应中——无论是简单的还是复杂的,并且在陈述性记忆和程序性记忆中都可以观察到这种损害。虽然有几篇综述论文关注的是提取诱发的言语和知觉信息遗忘,但迄今为止还没有文献综述专门关注提取诱发的运动反应或动作遗忘。此外,尽管在陈述性记忆领域中检索诱发遗忘已被广泛记录,但在程序性记忆领域中只有少数论文发表了检索诱发遗忘的记录。因此,本综述将探讨这些发现及其主要意义,其中最值得注意的是,当多个运动程序通过共享检索线索启动时,抑制抑制被招募来降低相关但不适当的动作的可及性,以增强对适当动作的检索。更广泛地说,控制认知中的选择性检索的过程与运动动作的选择性检索有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信