Sustainable Alternative for the Production of Soil Cement Bricks

Q3 Social Sciences
Joedy Maria Costa Santa Rosa, Rayane Gabriella Pereira da Silva, Kalinny Patrícia Vaz Lafayette
{"title":"Sustainable Alternative for the Production of Soil Cement Bricks","authors":"Joedy Maria Costa Santa Rosa, Rayane Gabriella Pereira da Silva, Kalinny Patrícia Vaz Lafayette","doi":"10.5539/jms.v13n1p45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The construction industry plays a fundamental role in the economy of a developing country, representing, in most of them, approximately 3.7% to 10.5% of its Gross Domestic Product. However, it is extremely important to search for sustainable alternatives in this sector, aiming to reduce the environmental impacts generated by the production of inputs, waste generation, in addition to the inappropriate disposal of this activity in the environment. Therefore, the work aimed to evaluate the technical and economic feasibility of the incorporation of residues (Marble and Granite Cutting Waste—MW and Construction and Demolition Waste—CDW) in the production of soil cement bricks (SCB). For the development of the present work, physical and mechanical characterization of the soil, residues (CDW and MW), composites (Control, MW15%, MW25%, MW50%, MW100%, MW30%CDW70%) were performed. After manufacturing the bricks, the characterizations mentioned were carried out at 7, 28 and 60 days, in addition to the evaluation of the geometric characteristics, water absorption and strength of the bricks and microscopic analysis of the post-rupture fragments. Additionally, a cost analysis of the use of SCB was performed compared to two different construction systems (ceramic brick and concrete block). From the results of physical characterization, soil was classified as clayey-silty sand (SC-SM), while the CDW was well-graded sand and MW as sandy clay. Soil and composite plasticity characteristics ranged from weakly plastic (MW15% and MW30%CDW70%) to highly plastic (MW100%). In the compaction tests, composites with the addition of MW presented increasing values in terms of optimal moisture. The compressive strength test performed showed satisfactory results for all composites, especially for MW25%, which obtained the most significant result with 13.777 kPa at 28 days. Thus, it is concluded that the incorporation of CDW and MW for the production of SCB represents a sustainable application for civil construction.","PeriodicalId":36330,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management and Sustainability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/jms.v13n1p45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The construction industry plays a fundamental role in the economy of a developing country, representing, in most of them, approximately 3.7% to 10.5% of its Gross Domestic Product. However, it is extremely important to search for sustainable alternatives in this sector, aiming to reduce the environmental impacts generated by the production of inputs, waste generation, in addition to the inappropriate disposal of this activity in the environment. Therefore, the work aimed to evaluate the technical and economic feasibility of the incorporation of residues (Marble and Granite Cutting Waste—MW and Construction and Demolition Waste—CDW) in the production of soil cement bricks (SCB). For the development of the present work, physical and mechanical characterization of the soil, residues (CDW and MW), composites (Control, MW15%, MW25%, MW50%, MW100%, MW30%CDW70%) were performed. After manufacturing the bricks, the characterizations mentioned were carried out at 7, 28 and 60 days, in addition to the evaluation of the geometric characteristics, water absorption and strength of the bricks and microscopic analysis of the post-rupture fragments. Additionally, a cost analysis of the use of SCB was performed compared to two different construction systems (ceramic brick and concrete block). From the results of physical characterization, soil was classified as clayey-silty sand (SC-SM), while the CDW was well-graded sand and MW as sandy clay. Soil and composite plasticity characteristics ranged from weakly plastic (MW15% and MW30%CDW70%) to highly plastic (MW100%). In the compaction tests, composites with the addition of MW presented increasing values in terms of optimal moisture. The compressive strength test performed showed satisfactory results for all composites, especially for MW25%, which obtained the most significant result with 13.777 kPa at 28 days. Thus, it is concluded that the incorporation of CDW and MW for the production of SCB represents a sustainable application for civil construction.
土壤水泥砖生产的可持续替代方案
建筑业在发展中国家的经济中起着至关重要的作用,在大多数发展中国家,建筑业约占其国内生产总值的3.7%至10.5%。然而,在这一部门寻找可持续的替代办法是极其重要的,其目的是减少生产投入、产生废物以及在环境中不当处置这一活动所产生的环境影响。因此,本研究旨在评估将废弃物(大理石和花岗岩切割废弃物- mw和建筑和拆除废弃物- cdw)纳入土壤水泥砖(SCB)生产的技术和经济可行性。为了开展本研究,对土壤、残留物(CDW和MW)、复合材料(对照、MW15%、MW25%、MW50%、MW100%、mw30%、cdw70%)进行了物理力学表征。在制造砖块后,除了砖块的几何特征,吸水率和强度的评估以及破碎后碎片的微观分析之外,还在第7,28和60天进行了上述表征。此外,将SCB的使用与两种不同的建筑系统(陶瓷砖和混凝土块)进行了成本分析。物理表征结果表明,土壤为粘粉质砂(SC-SM), CDW为分级良好的砂,MW为砂质粘土。土壤和复合材料的塑性特征从弱塑性(MW15%和mw30% - cdw70%)到高塑性(MW100%)。在压实试验中,添加MW的复合材料的最佳含水率呈增加趋势。所有复合材料的抗压强度试验结果均令人满意,其中以MW25%的抗压强度最为显著,28d时达到13.777 kPa。综上所述,结合CDW和MW生产SCB代表了民用建筑的可持续应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Management and Sustainability
International Journal of Management and Sustainability Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信