Neural Networks vs Logistic Regression: a Comparative Study on a Large Data Set

P. Adeodato, G. C. Vasconcelos, A. L. Arnaud, R. A. F. Santos, Rodrigo C. L. V. Cunha, Domingos S. M. P. Monteiro
{"title":"Neural Networks vs Logistic Regression: a Comparative Study on a Large Data Set","authors":"P. Adeodato, G. C. Vasconcelos, A. L. Arnaud, R. A. F. Santos, Rodrigo C. L. V. Cunha, Domingos S. M. P. Monteiro","doi":"10.1109/ICPR.2004.1334540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neural networks and logistic regression have been among the most widely used AI technique in applications of pattern classification.Much has been discussed about if there is any significant difference in between them but much less has been actually done with real-world applications data (large scale) to help settle this matter, with a few exceptions.This paper presents a performance comparison between these two techniques on the market application of credit risk assessment, making use of a large database from an outstanding credit bureau and financial institution (a sample of 180,000 examples).The comparison was carried out through a 30-fold stratified cross-validation process to define the confidence intervals for the performance evaluation. Several metrics were applied both on the optimal decision point and along the continuous output domain.The statistical tests showed that multilayer perceptrons perform better than logistic regression at 95% confidence level, for all the metrics used.","PeriodicalId":74516,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition. International Conference on Pattern Recognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition. International Conference on Pattern Recognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPR.2004.1334540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Neural networks and logistic regression have been among the most widely used AI technique in applications of pattern classification.Much has been discussed about if there is any significant difference in between them but much less has been actually done with real-world applications data (large scale) to help settle this matter, with a few exceptions.This paper presents a performance comparison between these two techniques on the market application of credit risk assessment, making use of a large database from an outstanding credit bureau and financial institution (a sample of 180,000 examples).The comparison was carried out through a 30-fold stratified cross-validation process to define the confidence intervals for the performance evaluation. Several metrics were applied both on the optimal decision point and along the continuous output domain.The statistical tests showed that multilayer perceptrons perform better than logistic regression at 95% confidence level, for all the metrics used.
神经网络与逻辑回归:大数据集的比较研究
神经网络和逻辑回归是模式分类中应用最广泛的人工智能技术。关于它们之间是否存在显著差异,已经讨论了很多,但是对于实际应用程序数据(大规模),除了少数例外,实际上很少有研究来帮助解决这个问题。本文利用某优秀征信机构和金融机构的大型数据库(样本为18万个),对两种技术在信用风险评估市场应用中的性能进行了比较。通过30倍分层交叉验证过程进行比较,以定义性能评估的置信区间。在最优决策点和连续输出域上应用了几个度量。统计测试表明,对于所有使用的指标,多层感知器在95%置信水平上的表现优于逻辑回归。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信