{"title":"Thomas Cromwell: a life","authors":"Paul Ayris","doi":"10.1080/14622459.2019.1616249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This biography of Thomas Cromwell is a long-awaited companion to Professor MacCulloch’s magisterial biography Thomas Cranmer: a life, Yale University Press, 1996. Steeped in the remains of Cromwell’s papers and archive (sifted by his staff and annotated by them and by those who seized it on Cromwell’s fall), the picture which emerges is fascinating and appealing, questioning many of the conventional wisdoms about Cromwell’s life and career. From these pages, we can see that there was no Tudor Revolution in government on the Elton model. Following the Act for First Fruits and Tenths (1534), no permanent department was created to manage them in Cromwell’s lifetime. In similar vein, from 1537 the term Privy Council designated twenty or so men named to that position. Elton saw this as part of the Tudor Revolution in government, but MacCulloch paints a different picture. This development of the Privy Council was to clip Cromwell’s wings, not to enhance his power. Perhaps the most important role of the many with which Cromwell was entrusted was that as the King’s vice-gerent in spirituals. MacCulloch underlines that this role continued throughout Cromwell’s lifetime until his death in 1540. The assertion is certainly borne out by the remains of a copy of his Register as vicegerent which contains seventeen documents, surely only exemplars of what must have been a much fuller archive. The last document recorded here is a commission, dated 3 February 1540, from Cromwell as vicegerent to try the marital cause of Walter, Lord Hungerford of Heytesbury. However, six months later, Hungerford was dead ‒ executed for buggery and other crimes alongside Cromwell himself on 28 July ‒ clearly an attempt by the government to discredit Cromwell still further by association. One of the seminal activities of the 1530s was the dissolution of the monasteries. MacCulloch shows that this was in effect a gradual ramping up of activity against the religious life and did not stem from a grandiose plan to destroy monastic life from the start. The destruction of the greater monasteries is a good example. Following the example of his previous master Cardinal Wolsey, Cromwell did not seek to destroy the greater monasteries wholesale. Many had reformed themselves and Cromwell himself advocated that they become less like monasteries and more like secular colleges. It was Henry who defeated this plan. Terrified at the thought of invasion by Continental powers, the King initiated the greatest national campaign for coastal defence in England until modern times. This work had to be paid for, and the monasteries were prime targets for raising the necessary funds. What of the traditional picture of Cromwell as cruel and rapacious? That is not a principal finding in this new biography, but aspects of Cromwell’s public life come under scrutiny. The trial of John Lambert alias Nicholson is a case in point. In 1538, Lambert cast doubt on the bodily presence of Christ in the Eucharist. Cranmer failed to convince him to recant and, fatally, Lambert appealed to the King. Henry, dressed in white, presided over a hearing in Westminster Hall. Cromwell’s role was simply to house the prisoner. Otherwise he kept his counsel as Lambert was burned at Smithfield on 22 November. It was a shocking moment for supporters of Protestant belief.","PeriodicalId":41309,"journal":{"name":"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW","volume":"47 1","pages":"154 - 156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14622459.2019.1616249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
This biography of Thomas Cromwell is a long-awaited companion to Professor MacCulloch’s magisterial biography Thomas Cranmer: a life, Yale University Press, 1996. Steeped in the remains of Cromwell’s papers and archive (sifted by his staff and annotated by them and by those who seized it on Cromwell’s fall), the picture which emerges is fascinating and appealing, questioning many of the conventional wisdoms about Cromwell’s life and career. From these pages, we can see that there was no Tudor Revolution in government on the Elton model. Following the Act for First Fruits and Tenths (1534), no permanent department was created to manage them in Cromwell’s lifetime. In similar vein, from 1537 the term Privy Council designated twenty or so men named to that position. Elton saw this as part of the Tudor Revolution in government, but MacCulloch paints a different picture. This development of the Privy Council was to clip Cromwell’s wings, not to enhance his power. Perhaps the most important role of the many with which Cromwell was entrusted was that as the King’s vice-gerent in spirituals. MacCulloch underlines that this role continued throughout Cromwell’s lifetime until his death in 1540. The assertion is certainly borne out by the remains of a copy of his Register as vicegerent which contains seventeen documents, surely only exemplars of what must have been a much fuller archive. The last document recorded here is a commission, dated 3 February 1540, from Cromwell as vicegerent to try the marital cause of Walter, Lord Hungerford of Heytesbury. However, six months later, Hungerford was dead ‒ executed for buggery and other crimes alongside Cromwell himself on 28 July ‒ clearly an attempt by the government to discredit Cromwell still further by association. One of the seminal activities of the 1530s was the dissolution of the monasteries. MacCulloch shows that this was in effect a gradual ramping up of activity against the religious life and did not stem from a grandiose plan to destroy monastic life from the start. The destruction of the greater monasteries is a good example. Following the example of his previous master Cardinal Wolsey, Cromwell did not seek to destroy the greater monasteries wholesale. Many had reformed themselves and Cromwell himself advocated that they become less like monasteries and more like secular colleges. It was Henry who defeated this plan. Terrified at the thought of invasion by Continental powers, the King initiated the greatest national campaign for coastal defence in England until modern times. This work had to be paid for, and the monasteries were prime targets for raising the necessary funds. What of the traditional picture of Cromwell as cruel and rapacious? That is not a principal finding in this new biography, but aspects of Cromwell’s public life come under scrutiny. The trial of John Lambert alias Nicholson is a case in point. In 1538, Lambert cast doubt on the bodily presence of Christ in the Eucharist. Cranmer failed to convince him to recant and, fatally, Lambert appealed to the King. Henry, dressed in white, presided over a hearing in Westminster Hall. Cromwell’s role was simply to house the prisoner. Otherwise he kept his counsel as Lambert was burned at Smithfield on 22 November. It was a shocking moment for supporters of Protestant belief.
这本托马斯·克伦威尔的传记是麦卡洛克教授的权威传记《托马斯·克兰麦:一生》的期待已久的姊本,耶鲁大学出版社,1996年。沉浸在克伦威尔的文件和档案的遗迹中(由他的工作人员筛选,并由他们和那些在克伦威尔倒台时获得的注释),浮现出的画面是迷人而吸引人的,质疑了许多关于克伦威尔生活和职业的传统智慧。从这些页面中,我们可以看到埃尔顿模式下的政府没有都铎革命。根据1534年的《初熟果实与十分之一法案》(Act for First Fruits and tenth, 1534),在克伦威尔的一生中,没有设立永久性的部门来管理它们。同样,从1537年起,枢密院任命了大约20人担任这一职位。埃尔顿认为这是政府都铎革命的一部分,但麦卡洛克却有不同的看法。枢密院的发展是为了遏制克伦威尔,而不是增强他的权力。也许克伦威尔被委以重任的最重要的角色是国王在圣歌方面的副手。这一说法当然可以从他作为代理人的登记册的副本中得到证实,其中包含17份文件,肯定只是一个更完整档案的范例。这里最后记录的文件是一份委托,日期是1540年2月3日,克伦威尔作为代理人,负责审理海茨伯里的亨格福德勋爵沃尔特的婚姻案件。然而,六个月后,亨格福德被处死——7月28日,他与克伦威尔一起因鸡奸和其他罪行被处决——很明显,这是政府试图通过联合进一步诋毁克伦威尔。1530年代影响深远的活动之一是修道院的解散。MacCulloch指出,这实际上是对宗教生活的一种逐渐增加的活动,而不是从一开始就源于摧毁修道院生活的宏伟计划。大修道院的毁灭就是一个很好的例子。克伦威尔以他的前任主人沃尔西枢机主教为榜样,并没有试图彻底摧毁更大的修道院。很多人都进行了自我改革克伦威尔自己也主张他们不再像修道院而更像世俗学院是亨利挫败了这个计划。由于害怕大陆列强的入侵,英王发起了英格兰迄今为止最大规模的海岸防御运动。这项工作需要支付费用,而修道院是筹集必要资金的主要目标。克伦威尔残忍贪婪的传统形象又如何呢?这不是这本新传记的主要发现,但克伦威尔公共生活的各个方面受到了仔细审视。别名尼科尔森的约翰·兰伯特的审判就是一个很好的例子。1538年,兰伯特对基督在圣餐中的身体存在表示怀疑。克兰麦没能说服他放弃,最后,兰伯特向国王上诉。亨利身穿白衣,在威斯敏斯特大厅主持听证会。克伦威尔的职责只是安置囚犯11月22日,兰伯特在史密斯菲尔德被烧死时,他守口如瓶。对于新教信仰的支持者来说,这是一个震惊的时刻。