Using Standards and Empirical Evidence to Develop Academic English Proficiency Test Items in Reading. CSE Technical Report 664.

A. Bailey, Robin S. Stevens, Frances A. Butler, Becky H. Huang, Judy N. Miyoshi
{"title":"Using Standards and Empirical Evidence to Develop Academic English Proficiency Test Items in Reading. CSE Technical Report 664.","authors":"A. Bailey, Robin S. Stevens, Frances A. Butler, Becky H. Huang, Judy N. Miyoshi","doi":"10.1037/e645092011-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The work we report focuses on utilizing linguistic profiles of mathematics, science and social studies textbook selections for the creation of reading test specifications. Once we determined that a text and associated tasks fit within the parameters established in Butler et al. (2004), they underwent both internal and external review by language experts and content-area teachers. The external review provided data based on background questionnaires, text and item reviews used to judge representative aspects of topics and linguistic characteristics, and group interviews. Based on this information, the texts were either retained or rejected and items were retained, rejected or reserved for future modification. In the future, retained texts and items can be further analyzed for fit with empirically established text profiles. Part I: Introduction As specified in the abstract, the purpose of this report is to apply the information acquired from comprehensive linguistic analyses of fifth-grade texts previously conducted (Butler, Bailey, Stevens, Huang, & Lord, 2004) to the development of standards-informed academic language items. The work described 1 Acknowledgments: We would like to thank the following for their role in the preparation of this work: the teachers who took part in the review and discussion of the texts and reading items developed here, administrative assistance from Soo Dennison and Morgan Joeck at the early stages of the work, Joan Herman for valuable feedback on an earlier draft of this report, and Fred Moss and Wade Contreras for the final formatting.","PeriodicalId":19116,"journal":{"name":"National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e645092011-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The work we report focuses on utilizing linguistic profiles of mathematics, science and social studies textbook selections for the creation of reading test specifications. Once we determined that a text and associated tasks fit within the parameters established in Butler et al. (2004), they underwent both internal and external review by language experts and content-area teachers. The external review provided data based on background questionnaires, text and item reviews used to judge representative aspects of topics and linguistic characteristics, and group interviews. Based on this information, the texts were either retained or rejected and items were retained, rejected or reserved for future modification. In the future, retained texts and items can be further analyzed for fit with empirically established text profiles. Part I: Introduction As specified in the abstract, the purpose of this report is to apply the information acquired from comprehensive linguistic analyses of fifth-grade texts previously conducted (Butler, Bailey, Stevens, Huang, & Lord, 2004) to the development of standards-informed academic language items. The work described 1 Acknowledgments: We would like to thank the following for their role in the preparation of this work: the teachers who took part in the review and discussion of the texts and reading items developed here, administrative assistance from Soo Dennison and Morgan Joeck at the early stages of the work, Joan Herman for valuable feedback on an earlier draft of this report, and Fred Moss and Wade Contreras for the final formatting.
运用标准和经验证据开发学术英语水平阅读测试项目。CSE技术报告664。
我们报告的工作重点是利用数学、科学和社会研究教科书的语言概况来创建阅读测试规范。一旦我们确定文本和相关任务符合Butler等人(2004)所建立的参数,他们就会接受语言专家和内容领域教师的内部和外部审查。外部审查提供的数据基于背景调查表、用于判断主题和语言特征的代表性方面的文本和项目审查以及小组访谈。根据这些信息,文本被保留或拒绝,项目被保留、拒绝或保留以供将来修改。在未来,保留的文本和项目可以进一步分析,以适应经验建立的文本配置文件。正如摘要中所述,本报告的目的是将从以前进行的五年级文本的综合语言分析中获得的信息(Butler, Bailey, Stevens, Huang, & Lord, 2004)应用于标准学术语言项目的开发。1致谢:我们要感谢以下人员在编写本报告中所起的作用:参与本报告编写的文本和阅读项目的审查和讨论的教师,在工作早期阶段来自Soo Dennison和Morgan Joeck的行政协助,Joan Herman对本报告早期草稿的宝贵反馈,以及Fred Moss和Wade Contreras的最终格式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信