A modern age dialogue between orthodox theology and science

S. Kostić
{"title":"A modern age dialogue between orthodox theology and science","authors":"S. Kostić","doi":"10.5937/kultura2379043k","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with the relationship of Orthodox theology and science throughout history and also considers contemporary dialogue of Orthodox theology and science. The foundational principle laid in the thought of Cappadocian Fathers emphasizes theosis as communion of man with God. The next segment deals with the paradox in the search of high knowledge: the highest thing we are looking for is beyond our knowledge, which is the exact reason why Basil of Caesarea has approved of human reasoning and development of human intellect. There is also an important theologian, Gregory Palamas, who has indicated that we cannot come to knowledge of God through secular science but through faith, contemplation and practices of asceticism, from which we are receiving true knowledge. His views are close to the axiom of Gregory the Theologian: Faith is what gives fullness to our reasoning. Then, a contemporary dialogue between Orthodox theology and science is also considered through the lenses of these theologians: Alexei Nesteruk, who represents the phenomenological approach to the relation of Orthodox theology and science; Stoyan Tanev, George Dion Dragas and Kyriacos Markides who represent reconsideration of the relationship between Orthodox theology and science through an anthropic principle; and Christopher Knight who pleads for theological naturalism. We conclude that phenomenological approach of Alexei Nesteruk - who has believed that interference between science and theology is possible by utilization of transcendence and asymmetry between theology and science for better understanding of existential condition of the human person - is close to the patristic view of theology and science.","PeriodicalId":53322,"journal":{"name":"Kultura Skopje","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kultura Skopje","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/kultura2379043k","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper deals with the relationship of Orthodox theology and science throughout history and also considers contemporary dialogue of Orthodox theology and science. The foundational principle laid in the thought of Cappadocian Fathers emphasizes theosis as communion of man with God. The next segment deals with the paradox in the search of high knowledge: the highest thing we are looking for is beyond our knowledge, which is the exact reason why Basil of Caesarea has approved of human reasoning and development of human intellect. There is also an important theologian, Gregory Palamas, who has indicated that we cannot come to knowledge of God through secular science but through faith, contemplation and practices of asceticism, from which we are receiving true knowledge. His views are close to the axiom of Gregory the Theologian: Faith is what gives fullness to our reasoning. Then, a contemporary dialogue between Orthodox theology and science is also considered through the lenses of these theologians: Alexei Nesteruk, who represents the phenomenological approach to the relation of Orthodox theology and science; Stoyan Tanev, George Dion Dragas and Kyriacos Markides who represent reconsideration of the relationship between Orthodox theology and science through an anthropic principle; and Christopher Knight who pleads for theological naturalism. We conclude that phenomenological approach of Alexei Nesteruk - who has believed that interference between science and theology is possible by utilization of transcendence and asymmetry between theology and science for better understanding of existential condition of the human person - is close to the patristic view of theology and science.
正统神学与科学的现代对话
本文论述了历史上东正教神学与科学的关系,并对当代东正教神学与科学的对话进行了思考。卡帕多西亚教父思想的基本原则强调神性是人与神的共融。下一节讲的是在寻找高知识时的悖论:我们所寻找的最高的东西超出了我们的知识,这就是为什么凯撒利亚的巴兹尔赞同人类推理和人类智力发展的确切原因。还有一位重要的神学家,Gregory Palamas,他指出,我们不能通过世俗的科学来认识上帝,而是通过信仰,沉思和禁欲主义的实践,我们从中获得真正的知识。他的观点接近神学家格列高利的公理:信仰使我们的推理充实。然后,当代东正教神学与科学之间的对话也通过这些神学家的镜头来考虑:阿列克谢·涅斯特鲁克,他代表了东正教神学与科学关系的现象学方法;斯托扬·塔内夫、乔治·迪翁·德拉加斯和基里亚科斯·马基德斯代表了通过人择原理重新思考东正教神学与科学之间的关系;以及为神学自然主义辩护的克里斯托弗·奈特。涅斯特鲁克认为,利用神学与科学之间的超越性和不对称性,可以更好地理解人的存在状态,从而实现科学与神学之间的干涉。涅斯特鲁克的现象学方法接近教父式的神学与科学观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信