Organic and Inorganic Pigments from Commercial Inks Used in Eyebrows’ Microblading: Approach for Assessing the Safety Use by Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay

Célia Marisa Oliveira-Ramos, E. H. Yoshida, Y. Oshima-Franco, V. M. Hanai-Yoshida
{"title":"Organic and Inorganic Pigments from Commercial Inks Used in Eyebrows’ Microblading: Approach for Assessing the Safety Use by Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay","authors":"Célia Marisa Oliveira-Ramos, E. H. Yoshida, Y. Oshima-Franco, V. M. Hanai-Yoshida","doi":"10.4236/jcdsa.2021.114027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objective: The aesthetic products’ safety should not be neglected to the detriment of the market. This study aimed to evaluate the mutagenic potential of commercial inks. It was formulated with organic (P1) and inorganic (P2) pigments for eyebrows microblading using a validated method by regulatory agencies, the Salmonella/microsome assay, to assure the safety of use. Methods: The assay was carried out in three steps: preliminary toxicity, medium without (−S9), and presence (+S9) of metabolic activation. The strains, auxotrophic to histidine (His-) TA97a, TA98, TA100, and TA102, were exposed to both types of inks, in triplicate, compared to negative and positive controls. Data were statistically analyzed, and values with mutagenic index ≥ 2.0 were indicative of mutagenicity. Results: The inks with organic (P1) and inorganic (P2) pigments were not toxic to TA98 and TA100 S. typhimurium tester strains, even at concentrations applied in humans. Both inks were not mutagenic either in the absence or presence of metabolic activation in the tested concentrations, including that applied in humans. The assay showed that P1 and P2 were not direct (−S9) or indirect (+S9) mutagens as commercially formulated. Conclusions: These results indicate that applying these inks on organisms with microsomal enzymes, including humans, is safe since no compound in the inks became more toxic to induce the bacterial reverse mutation.","PeriodicalId":15654,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cosmetics, Dermatological Sciences and Applications","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cosmetics, Dermatological Sciences and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/jcdsa.2021.114027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objective: The aesthetic products’ safety should not be neglected to the detriment of the market. This study aimed to evaluate the mutagenic potential of commercial inks. It was formulated with organic (P1) and inorganic (P2) pigments for eyebrows microblading using a validated method by regulatory agencies, the Salmonella/microsome assay, to assure the safety of use. Methods: The assay was carried out in three steps: preliminary toxicity, medium without (−S9), and presence (+S9) of metabolic activation. The strains, auxotrophic to histidine (His-) TA97a, TA98, TA100, and TA102, were exposed to both types of inks, in triplicate, compared to negative and positive controls. Data were statistically analyzed, and values with mutagenic index ≥ 2.0 were indicative of mutagenicity. Results: The inks with organic (P1) and inorganic (P2) pigments were not toxic to TA98 and TA100 S. typhimurium tester strains, even at concentrations applied in humans. Both inks were not mutagenic either in the absence or presence of metabolic activation in the tested concentrations, including that applied in humans. The assay showed that P1 and P2 were not direct (−S9) or indirect (+S9) mutagens as commercially formulated. Conclusions: These results indicate that applying these inks on organisms with microsomal enzymes, including humans, is safe since no compound in the inks became more toxic to induce the bacterial reverse mutation.
用于眉毛微刮刀的商业油墨中的有机和无机颜料:用细菌反向突变试验评估使用安全性的方法
背景与目的:美容产品的安全性不容忽视,不利于市场的发展。本研究旨在评估商业油墨的诱变潜力。该产品由有机(P1)和无机(P2)颜料配制而成,用于眉毛微刮刀,使用监管机构验证的方法,沙门氏菌/微粒试验,以确保使用安全。方法:采用初步毒性、无(−S9)培养基和有(+S9)代谢激活三步法。与阴性对照和阳性对照相比,将对组氨酸(His-)缺乏营养的菌株TA97a、TA98、TA100和TA102分三次暴露于这两种油墨中。对数据进行统计学分析,致突变性指数≥2.0为致突变性。结果:含有机(P1)和无机(P2)颜料的油墨对TA98和TA100鼠伤寒沙门氏菌试验菌株没有毒性,即使在人体使用浓度下也是如此。两种油墨在没有或存在代谢激活的测试浓度下都不具有诱变性,包括在人体中应用的浓度。实验表明P1和P2不是直接(−S9)或间接(+S9)诱变剂。结论:这些结果表明,将这些油墨应用于具有微粒体酶的生物体,包括人类,是安全的,因为油墨中的化合物没有毒性更大,从而诱导细菌反向突变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信