Assessing Equipment, Supplies, and Devices for Patient Safety Issues

IF 2.6 Q1 SURGERY
R. Ratwani, Katharine T. Adams, Tracy C. Kim, Deanna-Nicole Busog, Jessica L. Howe, Rebecca Jones, Seth Krevat
{"title":"Assessing Equipment, Supplies, and Devices for Patient Safety Issues","authors":"R. Ratwani, Katharine T. Adams, Tracy C. Kim, Deanna-Nicole Busog, Jessica L. Howe, Rebecca Jones, Seth Krevat","doi":"10.33940/data/2023.3.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Medical equipment, supplies, and devices (ESD) serve a critical function in healthcare delivery and how they function can have patient safety consequences. ESD-related safety issues include malfunctions, physically missing ESDs, sterilization, and usability. Describing ESD-related safety issues from a human factors perspective that focuses on user interactions with ESDs can provide additional insights to address these issues. \n\nMethods: We manually reviewed ESD patient safety event reports submitted to the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Reporting System to identify ESD-related safety issues using a taxonomy that was informed by the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience taxonomy. This taxonomy consisted of the following high-level categories: malfunctions, physically missing, sterilization, and usability. The type of ESD and associated components or ESD subtypes, event classification, and care area group were noted for each report. \n\nResults: Of the 450 reports reviewed, the most frequent ESD-related safety issue coded was malfunction (n=365 of 450, 81.1%) followed by sterilization (n=40 of 450, 8.9%), usability (n=36 of 450, 8.0%), and physically missing (n=9 of 450, 2.0%). Among the coded malfunctions, software/output problem (n=122 of 365, 33.4%) was the most frequent, followed by general malfunction (n=103 of 365, 28.2%); material integrity (n=72 of 365, 19.7%); and activation, positioning, or separation (n=68 of 365, 18.6%). The most frequent ESDs noted were infusion pump, instrument set, and intravenous, and the most frequent components/subtypes noted were alarm/alert, tubing, and tray. \n\nConclusion: ESD-related patient safety issues, especially malfunctions, impact patient care despite current policies and practices to address these issues. Healthcare facilities may be able to address some ESD-related patient safety issues during procurement through use of the accompanying procurement assessment tool.","PeriodicalId":46782,"journal":{"name":"Patient Safety in Surgery","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Safety in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33940/data/2023.3.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical equipment, supplies, and devices (ESD) serve a critical function in healthcare delivery and how they function can have patient safety consequences. ESD-related safety issues include malfunctions, physically missing ESDs, sterilization, and usability. Describing ESD-related safety issues from a human factors perspective that focuses on user interactions with ESDs can provide additional insights to address these issues. Methods: We manually reviewed ESD patient safety event reports submitted to the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Reporting System to identify ESD-related safety issues using a taxonomy that was informed by the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience taxonomy. This taxonomy consisted of the following high-level categories: malfunctions, physically missing, sterilization, and usability. The type of ESD and associated components or ESD subtypes, event classification, and care area group were noted for each report. Results: Of the 450 reports reviewed, the most frequent ESD-related safety issue coded was malfunction (n=365 of 450, 81.1%) followed by sterilization (n=40 of 450, 8.9%), usability (n=36 of 450, 8.0%), and physically missing (n=9 of 450, 2.0%). Among the coded malfunctions, software/output problem (n=122 of 365, 33.4%) was the most frequent, followed by general malfunction (n=103 of 365, 28.2%); material integrity (n=72 of 365, 19.7%); and activation, positioning, or separation (n=68 of 365, 18.6%). The most frequent ESDs noted were infusion pump, instrument set, and intravenous, and the most frequent components/subtypes noted were alarm/alert, tubing, and tray. Conclusion: ESD-related patient safety issues, especially malfunctions, impact patient care despite current policies and practices to address these issues. Healthcare facilities may be able to address some ESD-related patient safety issues during procurement through use of the accompanying procurement assessment tool.
评估患者安全问题的设备、用品和器械
背景:医疗设备、用品和设备(ESD)在医疗保健服务中起着关键作用,它们的功能如何会对患者安全产生影响。与静电防护相关的安全问题包括故障、物理上缺失的静电防护、灭菌和可用性。从人为因素的角度描述与esd相关的安全问题,重点关注用户与esd的交互,可以为解决这些问题提供额外的见解。方法:我们手动审查提交给宾夕法尼亚州患者安全报告系统的ESD患者安全事件报告,使用食品和药物管理局制造商和用户设施设备体验分类法通知的分类法识别与ESD相关的安全问题。该分类法由以下高级类别组成:故障、物理丢失、灭菌和可用性。每个报告都记录了ESD的类型和相关组件或ESD子类型、事件分类和护理区域组。结果:在审查的450份报告中,最常见的与静电相关的安全问题编码是故障(n=365 / 450, 81.1%),其次是灭菌(n=40 / 450, 8.9%),可用性(n=36 / 450, 8.0%)和物理缺失(n=9 / 450, 2.0%)。在编码故障中,最常见的是软件/输出问题(365例中n=122例,占33.4%),其次是一般故障(365例中n=103例,占28.2%);材料完整性(n=72 / 365, 19.7%);激活、定位或分离(n=68 / 365, 18.6%)。最常见的ESDs是输液泵、器械组和静脉,最常见的部件/亚型是警报/警报、管和托盘。结论:尽管目前的政策和实践解决了这些问题,但与esd相关的患者安全问题,特别是故障,仍然影响着患者的护理。通过使用随附的采购评估工具,医疗机构可能能够在采购期间解决一些与esd相关的患者安全问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信