Impact of Urban Microclimate on Air Conditioning Energy Consumption Using Different Convective Heat Transfer Coefficient Correlations Available in Building Energy Simulation Tools

Sambhaji T. Kadam, I. Hassan, L. Wang, M. A. Rahman
{"title":"Impact of Urban Microclimate on Air Conditioning Energy Consumption Using Different Convective Heat Transfer Coefficient Correlations Available in Building Energy Simulation Tools","authors":"Sambhaji T. Kadam, I. Hassan, L. Wang, M. A. Rahman","doi":"10.1115/fedsm2021-65589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Rapid urbanization resulted in the drastic expansion of the built infrastructure in urban areas. This eventually led to an increase in energy consumption in the residential and commercial sectors. An appropriate selection of the convective heat transfer coefficient correlation at the design stage is of vital importance as it directly affects the cooling load of the building and consequently buildings’ energy demand. In this context, the comparative analysis of existing convective heat transfer coefficient correlations (CHTCs) used in building simulation programs such as EnergyPlus, ESP-r, IES, IDA, and TAS, are assessed. These correlations are tested against the data of Liu et al.’s [1]. It is observed that some of CHTCs correlations show lower error and others exhibit a significant deviation. In the case of the CHTCs used EnergyPlus, it is observed that the TARP algorithm shows overall better prediction ability for windward, leeward, and roof surface. On the other hand, in the case of the ESP-r, different correlations show a good prediction ability for different surfaces. For windward surface: MoWiTT; for leeward surface: MoWiTT and McAdams; and for roof surface: Liu and Harris show closer prediction with an error of less than 30% among other correlations. The correlation used in IES, IDA, and TAS shows a large deviation for windward, leeward, and roof surfaces under considered input. Based on this analysis, it can be concluded that the choice of such CHTCs uses in the BES tool can lead to the significantly higher energy consumption of the building and hence need the expertise to make the appropriate selection.","PeriodicalId":23636,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: Fluid Applications and Systems; Fluid Measurement and Instrumentation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: Fluid Applications and Systems; Fluid Measurement and Instrumentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/fedsm2021-65589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid urbanization resulted in the drastic expansion of the built infrastructure in urban areas. This eventually led to an increase in energy consumption in the residential and commercial sectors. An appropriate selection of the convective heat transfer coefficient correlation at the design stage is of vital importance as it directly affects the cooling load of the building and consequently buildings’ energy demand. In this context, the comparative analysis of existing convective heat transfer coefficient correlations (CHTCs) used in building simulation programs such as EnergyPlus, ESP-r, IES, IDA, and TAS, are assessed. These correlations are tested against the data of Liu et al.’s [1]. It is observed that some of CHTCs correlations show lower error and others exhibit a significant deviation. In the case of the CHTCs used EnergyPlus, it is observed that the TARP algorithm shows overall better prediction ability for windward, leeward, and roof surface. On the other hand, in the case of the ESP-r, different correlations show a good prediction ability for different surfaces. For windward surface: MoWiTT; for leeward surface: MoWiTT and McAdams; and for roof surface: Liu and Harris show closer prediction with an error of less than 30% among other correlations. The correlation used in IES, IDA, and TAS shows a large deviation for windward, leeward, and roof surfaces under considered input. Based on this analysis, it can be concluded that the choice of such CHTCs uses in the BES tool can lead to the significantly higher energy consumption of the building and hence need the expertise to make the appropriate selection.
基于不同对流换热系数的城市小气候对空调能耗的影响
快速的城市化导致了城市地区基础设施建设的急剧扩张。这最终导致了住宅和商业部门能源消耗的增加。在设计阶段合理选择对流换热系数相关系数是至关重要的,因为它直接影响到建筑的冷负荷,从而影响到建筑的能源需求。在此背景下,对EnergyPlus、ESP-r、IES、IDA和TAS等建筑模拟程序中使用的现有对流换热系数相关性(chtc)进行了比较分析。我们用Liu等人[1]的数据对这些相关性进行了检验。观察到,一些chtc相关性显示出较低的误差,而其他chtc相关性显示出显著的偏差。在使用EnergyPlus的chtc中,可以观察到,TARP算法对迎风面、背风面和顶板面的预测能力总体较好。另一方面,在ESP-r的情况下,不同的相关性显示出对不同表面的良好预测能力。迎风面:MoWiTT;背风面:MoWiTT和McAdams;对于屋顶表面:刘和哈里斯在其他相关性中给出了更接近的预测,误差小于30%。在IES、IDA和TAS中使用的相关性显示,在考虑输入的情况下,迎风面、背风面和屋顶表面存在很大偏差。基于这一分析,可以得出结论,在BES工具中选择这种chtc使用会导致建筑物的能耗显著提高,因此需要专业知识来做出适当的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信