The Good, the Bad, and the Variable: Examining Stress and Blood Pressure Responses to Close Relationships.

IF 2.6 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
European Journal of Forest Research Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-27 DOI:10.1177/19485506231156018
Brian P Don, Amie M Gordon, Wendy Berry Mendes
{"title":"The Good, the Bad, and the Variable: Examining Stress and Blood Pressure Responses to Close Relationships.","authors":"Brian P Don, Amie M Gordon, Wendy Berry Mendes","doi":"10.1177/19485506231156018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social relationships influence physical health, yet questions remain regarding the nature of this association. For instance, when it comes to predicting health-relevant processes in daily life, few studies have examined (a) the relative importance of both positive <i>and</i> negative relational experiences, and (b) <i>variability</i> in relational experiences (in addition to mean levels). To address these gaps, we conducted a daily study (<i>N</i> = 4,005; ~ 30,000 observations) examining relationships, stress, and physiology in daily life. Heart rate and blood pressure were assessed using an optic sensor and integrated with an app-based study. Results demonstrated that higher mean levels of positive and lower mean levels of negative relational experiences predicted lower stress, better coping, and better physiological functioning in daily life, such as lower systolic blood pressure reactivity. Greater variability in negative (but not positive) relational experiences predicted <i>lower</i> stress, <i>better</i> coping, and <i>lower</i> systolic blood pressure reactivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":11996,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Forest Research","volume":"134 1","pages":"288-298"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11178353/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Forest Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506231156018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social relationships influence physical health, yet questions remain regarding the nature of this association. For instance, when it comes to predicting health-relevant processes in daily life, few studies have examined (a) the relative importance of both positive and negative relational experiences, and (b) variability in relational experiences (in addition to mean levels). To address these gaps, we conducted a daily study (N = 4,005; ~ 30,000 observations) examining relationships, stress, and physiology in daily life. Heart rate and blood pressure were assessed using an optic sensor and integrated with an app-based study. Results demonstrated that higher mean levels of positive and lower mean levels of negative relational experiences predicted lower stress, better coping, and better physiological functioning in daily life, such as lower systolic blood pressure reactivity. Greater variability in negative (but not positive) relational experiences predicted lower stress, better coping, and lower systolic blood pressure reactivity.

好、坏和变数:研究亲密关系带来的压力和血压反应。
社会关系会影响身体健康,但关于这种关联的性质仍然存在疑问。例如,在预测日常生活中与健康相关的过程时,很少有研究对(a)积极和消极关系体验的相对重要性,以及(b)关系体验的可变性(除平均水平外)进行研究。为了弥补这些不足,我们进行了一项日常研究(N = 4,005; ~ 30,000 观察值),对日常生活中的人际关系、压力和生理进行了研究。我们使用光学传感器对心率和血压进行了评估,并将其与基于应用程序的研究相结合。结果表明,积极人际关系经验的平均水平越高,消极人际关系经验的平均水平越低,预示着压力越小,应对能力越强,日常生活中的生理功能越好,如收缩压反应性越低。消极(而非积极)亲情体验的变异性越大,预示着压力越小、应对能力越强以及收缩压反应性越低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Forest Research focuses on publishing innovative results of empirical or model-oriented studies which contribute to the development of broad principles underlying forest ecosystems, their functions and services. Papers which exclusively report methods, models, techniques or case studies are beyond the scope of the journal, while papers on studies at the molecular or cellular level will be considered where they address the relevance of their results to the understanding of ecosystem structure and function. Papers relating to forest operations and forest engineering will be considered if they are tailored within a forest ecosystem context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信