Aby Warburg: The Collective Memory as a Medium for Art

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Anastasis Pub Date : 2021-05-29 DOI:10.35218/armca.2021.1.13
Gabriel M. Badea
{"title":"Aby Warburg: The Collective Memory as a Medium for Art","authors":"Gabriel M. Badea","doi":"10.35218/armca.2021.1.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I intend to study the contribution of Aby Warburg, a cultural theorist and an art historian, especially his concern with the relations between memory and history, relations that have been theorized in the late 20th century, but which Warburg anticipated, to a certain degree. In his writings, there can be identified those relations that make memory a metahistorical category or an anti-historical discourse (Pierre Nora, Yosef Yerushalmi); then, his writings can be connected with those of Maurice Halbwachs, the first who approached memory as a social phenomenon. Thus, according to Warburg, collective memory can be regarded as a medium for art, which ensures the survival of images and pathos formulas even when the violence of historical development leads to a decline of the creative spirit. One might say that via a detour through the archaic (Pueblo Indian culture), Warburg managed to reduce the distances which the historical method had established to the Antiquity's vestiges (process that started in the Renaissance). His hypothesis was that the employment in the historical development of Western civilization leads to the atrophy of certain potentialities of the human spirit, which can be addressed in the anti-historicist discourse, specific to postmodernity. In the last part of the paper, I propose to dwell on The Mnemosyne Atlas, Warburg’s last project, as a visual synthesis of the research that he conducted throughout his life.","PeriodicalId":37287,"journal":{"name":"Anastasis","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anastasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35218/armca.2021.1.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper, I intend to study the contribution of Aby Warburg, a cultural theorist and an art historian, especially his concern with the relations between memory and history, relations that have been theorized in the late 20th century, but which Warburg anticipated, to a certain degree. In his writings, there can be identified those relations that make memory a metahistorical category or an anti-historical discourse (Pierre Nora, Yosef Yerushalmi); then, his writings can be connected with those of Maurice Halbwachs, the first who approached memory as a social phenomenon. Thus, according to Warburg, collective memory can be regarded as a medium for art, which ensures the survival of images and pathos formulas even when the violence of historical development leads to a decline of the creative spirit. One might say that via a detour through the archaic (Pueblo Indian culture), Warburg managed to reduce the distances which the historical method had established to the Antiquity's vestiges (process that started in the Renaissance). His hypothesis was that the employment in the historical development of Western civilization leads to the atrophy of certain potentialities of the human spirit, which can be addressed in the anti-historicist discourse, specific to postmodernity. In the last part of the paper, I propose to dwell on The Mnemosyne Atlas, Warburg’s last project, as a visual synthesis of the research that he conducted throughout his life.
艾比·沃伯格:作为艺术媒介的集体记忆
在本文中,我打算研究文化理论家和艺术史学家Aby Warburg的贡献,特别是他对记忆与历史之间关系的关注,这种关系在20世纪后期已经理论化,但Warburg在一定程度上预测到了。在他的著作中,可以识别出那些使记忆成为元历史范畴或反历史话语的关系(皮埃尔·诺拉,约瑟夫·耶鲁沙米);那么,他的作品可以与莫里斯·哈布瓦克斯的作品联系起来,莫里斯·哈布瓦克斯是第一个将记忆视为一种社会现象的人。因此,根据Warburg的观点,集体记忆可以被视为艺术的媒介,即使在历史发展的暴力导致创作精神的衰落时,它也能确保图像和悲情公式的生存。有人可能会说,Warburg通过绕道古代(普韦布洛印第安文化),设法缩短了历史方法与古代遗迹(始于文艺复兴时期的过程)之间的距离。他的假设是,西方文明在历史发展中的运用导致了人类精神某些潜能的萎缩,这可以在后现代性的反历史主义话语中得到解决。在论文的最后一部分,我打算详细介绍《记忆之神地图集》,这是Warburg的最后一个项目,作为他一生研究的视觉综合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anastasis
Anastasis Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信