E. Gregório, A. P. Alexandrino, I. Schuquel, W. Costa, M. A. Rodrigues
{"title":"Seminal citrate is superior to PSA for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer","authors":"E. Gregório, A. P. Alexandrino, I. Schuquel, W. Costa, M. A. Rodrigues","doi":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Purpose: To establish whether the citrate concentration in the seminal fluid ([CITRATE]) measured by means of high-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1HNMRS) is superior to the serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration in detecting of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in men with persistently elevated PSA. Materials and Methods: The group of patients consisted of 31 consecutively seen men with histological diagnosis of clinically localized csPCa. The control group consisted of 28 men under long-term follow-up (mean of 8.7 ± 3.0 years) for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), with persistently elevated PSA (above 4 ng/mL) and several prostate biopsies negative for cancer (mean of 2.7 ± 1.3 biopsies per control). Samples of blood and seminal fluid (by masturbation) for measurement of PSA and citrate concentration, respectively, were collected from patients and controls. Citrate concentration in the seminal fluid ([CITRATE]) was determined by means of 1HNMRS. The capacities of PSA and [CITRATE] to predict csPCa were compared by means of univariate analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: Median [CITRATE] was significantly lower among patients with csPCa compared to controls (3.93 mM/l vs. 15.53 mM/l). There was no significant difference in mean PSA between patients and controls (9.42 ng/mL vs. 8.57 ng/mL). The accuracy of [CITRATE] for detecting csPCa was significantly superior compared to PSA (74.8% vs. 54.8%). Conclusion: Measurement of [CITRATE] by means of 1HNMRS is superior to PSA for early detection of csPCa in men with elevated PSA.","PeriodicalId":13674,"journal":{"name":"International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology","volume":"24 1","pages":"1113 - 1121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
ABSTRACT Purpose: To establish whether the citrate concentration in the seminal fluid ([CITRATE]) measured by means of high-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1HNMRS) is superior to the serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration in detecting of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in men with persistently elevated PSA. Materials and Methods: The group of patients consisted of 31 consecutively seen men with histological diagnosis of clinically localized csPCa. The control group consisted of 28 men under long-term follow-up (mean of 8.7 ± 3.0 years) for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), with persistently elevated PSA (above 4 ng/mL) and several prostate biopsies negative for cancer (mean of 2.7 ± 1.3 biopsies per control). Samples of blood and seminal fluid (by masturbation) for measurement of PSA and citrate concentration, respectively, were collected from patients and controls. Citrate concentration in the seminal fluid ([CITRATE]) was determined by means of 1HNMRS. The capacities of PSA and [CITRATE] to predict csPCa were compared by means of univariate analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: Median [CITRATE] was significantly lower among patients with csPCa compared to controls (3.93 mM/l vs. 15.53 mM/l). There was no significant difference in mean PSA between patients and controls (9.42 ng/mL vs. 8.57 ng/mL). The accuracy of [CITRATE] for detecting csPCa was significantly superior compared to PSA (74.8% vs. 54.8%). Conclusion: Measurement of [CITRATE] by means of 1HNMRS is superior to PSA for early detection of csPCa in men with elevated PSA.
目的:探讨高分辨率核磁共振波谱(1HNMRS)检测精液中柠檬酸盐浓度([citrate])是否优于血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)浓度检测PSA持续升高的男性临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)。材料与方法:本组患者为31例经组织学诊断为临床上局限性csPCa的男性患者。对照组包括28名长期随访(平均8.7±3.0年)的良性前列腺增生(BPH)男性,PSA持续升高(高于4 ng/mL),多次前列腺活检呈癌阴性(平均每名对照组2.7±1.3次活检)。分别采集患者和对照组的血液和精液样本(通过手淫)用于测定PSA和柠檬酸盐浓度。用1hnmr测定精液中柠檬酸盐浓度([Citrate])。通过单因素分析和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线比较PSA和[CITRATE]预测csPCa的能力。结果:与对照组相比,csPCa患者的中位[CITRATE]显著降低(3.93 mM/l vs. 15.53 mM/l)。患者和对照组的平均PSA无显著差异(9.42 ng/mL vs. 8.57 ng/mL)。[CITRATE]检测csPCa的准确性明显优于PSA (74.8% vs. 54.8%)。结论:1HNMRS检测[CITRATE]对PSA升高的男性csPCa的早期检测效果优于PSA。