Scientific research work of teachers in higher education institutions of the USSR during the years of the Khrushñhov “Thaw” (on the example of Vinnytsky and Kamianets-Podilskyi pedagogical institutes)

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to analyze the main areas of research work of tea chers of Vinnytsia and Kamianets-Podilskyi Pedagogical Institutes during the years of Khrushchov’s “thaw” on the basis of archival sources and periodical press materials. Th e methodological basis of the research is the principles of historicism, systematicity and comprehensiveness, problem- chronological and diachronic methods. Th e scientifi c novelty of the article is determined by the comprehensive analysis of the subject of scientifi c research works of the teachers at the above- mentioned pedagogical institutes, their preparation of dissertation studies, scientifi c works, and participation in conferences. Conclusions. Research work was an important activity area of the Vinnytsia and Kamianets-Podilskyi Pedagogical Institutes. Th e primary responsibility for its implementation rested with the teaching corporation, which in its research paid the main atten- tion to pedagogical issues aimed at improving educational and methodological work in higher education institutions and schools. An important area of the pedagogical universities’ activity was the preparation of doctoral and candidate dissertations by teachers. In order to activate the process, the institution’s management used diff erent ways (targeted and one-year postgraduate studies, creative vacations, reduction of the academic load, etc.). However, a number of scientists were unable to defend their works, primarily due to the lack of a mechanism for coordinating scientifi c research. Teachers prepared monographic studies, textbooks, and manuals, articles, some of which appeared in prestigious scientifi c journals. However, the total number of works of higher education teachers was insignifi cant (an average of 45 works were issued per institute each year). Most of them were published in collections of scientifi c works of pedagogical insti- tutes (“Scientifi c notes”). Report scientifi c conferences (sessions) of teachers were held annually.