Rumination after 65: does its association with depression and gender change with age?

Spor Emeline, Lefevre Carole, Miljkovitch Raphaële
{"title":"Rumination after 65: does its association with depression and gender change with age?","authors":"Spor Emeline, Lefevre Carole, Miljkovitch Raphaële","doi":"10.33425/2833-5449.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: It is well documented that, in adults, women are more prone to ruminate than men, and rumination and depression are robustly correlated. However, very little is known about how these links evolve as aging. The age-related cognitive and identity evolutions deeply modify the elderly’s overall functioning, legitimizing this issue. Method: Sixty-four participants were recruited by seniors’ networks. The participants had to be over 65 years old, without cognitive impairment or chronic pain. The experiment included the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), to assess the presence and severity of depression, and the Mini-CERTS, which evaluates the frequency of both analytic and experiential repetitive thoughts. The Mental Alternation Test (MAT) was used as a preliminary test to help ensure that participants did not have cognitive impairment. Participants were contacted over the phone. A structured interview and a MAT test were used to assess the inclusion criteria. If the participant matched the required profile, the GDS and the mini-CERTS were administered in random order. Results: Results show a negative correlation between frequency of constructive repetitive thoughts and depression (r = -.49; p <.001) and a positive correlation between frequency of rumination and depression (r = .40; p <.001). No significant difference was shown regarding gender and frequency of ruminations (p> .05). Discussion: These results validate the maintenance of the links between repetitive thinking and depression during aging, but not the difference between men and women. These findings encourage the use of rumination-focused therapies in the treatment of depression in the elderly.","PeriodicalId":93860,"journal":{"name":"Advances in psychiatry and behavioral health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in psychiatry and behavioral health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2833-5449.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: It is well documented that, in adults, women are more prone to ruminate than men, and rumination and depression are robustly correlated. However, very little is known about how these links evolve as aging. The age-related cognitive and identity evolutions deeply modify the elderly’s overall functioning, legitimizing this issue. Method: Sixty-four participants were recruited by seniors’ networks. The participants had to be over 65 years old, without cognitive impairment or chronic pain. The experiment included the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), to assess the presence and severity of depression, and the Mini-CERTS, which evaluates the frequency of both analytic and experiential repetitive thoughts. The Mental Alternation Test (MAT) was used as a preliminary test to help ensure that participants did not have cognitive impairment. Participants were contacted over the phone. A structured interview and a MAT test were used to assess the inclusion criteria. If the participant matched the required profile, the GDS and the mini-CERTS were administered in random order. Results: Results show a negative correlation between frequency of constructive repetitive thoughts and depression (r = -.49; p <.001) and a positive correlation between frequency of rumination and depression (r = .40; p <.001). No significant difference was shown regarding gender and frequency of ruminations (p> .05). Discussion: These results validate the maintenance of the links between repetitive thinking and depression during aging, but not the difference between men and women. These findings encourage the use of rumination-focused therapies in the treatment of depression in the elderly.
65岁后的反思:它与抑郁和性别的关系是否随着年龄的增长而改变?
背景:有充分的证据表明,在成年人中,女性比男性更容易反刍,而反刍和抑郁是紧密相关的。然而,人们对这些联系是如何随着年龄的增长而进化的知之甚少。与年龄相关的认知和身份演变深刻地改变了老年人的整体功能,使这一问题合法化。方法:通过老年人网络招募64名参与者。参与者必须超过65岁,没有认知障碍或慢性疼痛。实验包括了老年抑郁量表(GDS)和Mini-CERTS,前者用来评估抑郁的存在和严重程度,后者用来评估分析性和经验性重复思维的频率。精神交替测试(MAT)被用作初步测试,以帮助确保参与者没有认知障碍。参与者通过电话联系。采用结构化访谈和MAT测试来评估纳入标准。如果参与者符合要求,则按随机顺序进行GDS和mini-CERTS。结果:建设性重复思维频率与抑郁呈负相关(r = - 0.49;p . 05)。讨论:这些结果证实了在衰老过程中重复思考和抑郁之间的联系,但不是男性和女性之间的差异。这些发现鼓励在老年人抑郁症的治疗中使用以反刍为重点的疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信