Isolation and Identification of Urinary Tract Infectious Bacteria and Exploring their Anti-drug Potential against Some Common Antibiotics

Karzan Mohammed, Faeza Burhan, Shahida Nooruldeen
{"title":"Isolation and Identification of Urinary Tract Infectious Bacteria and Exploring their Anti-drug Potential against Some Common Antibiotics","authors":"Karzan Mohammed, Faeza Burhan, Shahida Nooruldeen","doi":"10.4172/1948-5948.1000379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urinary tract infection caused by bacteria leads to inflammation and over growth of uropathogens and prevalence of infection for both genders, but women is more vulnerable especially at the sexually active ages. Nine isolates from sixteen patients were microscopically tested, characterized, identified using different media and biochemical tests. The highest rate of isolated bacteria were Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus (23.52%), followed by Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Entrococcus faecalis (17.64% and 8.82), respectively and Entrobacter aerogenes, Klebsiella pneumonia, Proteus vulgaris and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were (5.88%), only 2.94% of bacteria was detected as Proteus miralilis. Effect of different antibiotics was reported, maximum effect showed by Gentamycin and Chloramphenicol (80% and 70%), respectively. Contrastingly, levofloxacin 50%, Amikacin and Nitrofurantoin 40%, Ceftriaxone and Amoxicillin 30%, Cefixime 10%. In conclusion, unsuitable medication prior to urine culturing causes to increase prevalence of gram positive bacteria as much as gram negatives and developing multidrug resistance.","PeriodicalId":16453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microbial & Biochemical Technology","volume":"135 1","pages":"285-289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microbial & Biochemical Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/1948-5948.1000379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Urinary tract infection caused by bacteria leads to inflammation and over growth of uropathogens and prevalence of infection for both genders, but women is more vulnerable especially at the sexually active ages. Nine isolates from sixteen patients were microscopically tested, characterized, identified using different media and biochemical tests. The highest rate of isolated bacteria were Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus (23.52%), followed by Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Entrococcus faecalis (17.64% and 8.82), respectively and Entrobacter aerogenes, Klebsiella pneumonia, Proteus vulgaris and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were (5.88%), only 2.94% of bacteria was detected as Proteus miralilis. Effect of different antibiotics was reported, maximum effect showed by Gentamycin and Chloramphenicol (80% and 70%), respectively. Contrastingly, levofloxacin 50%, Amikacin and Nitrofurantoin 40%, Ceftriaxone and Amoxicillin 30%, Cefixime 10%. In conclusion, unsuitable medication prior to urine culturing causes to increase prevalence of gram positive bacteria as much as gram negatives and developing multidrug resistance.
尿路感染性细菌的分离鉴定及其对常用抗生素的抗药潜力探讨
细菌引起的尿路感染导致男女尿路病原体的炎症和过度生长和感染的流行,但女性更容易受到感染,特别是在性活跃年龄。对来自16例患者的9株分离株进行了镜检、特征鉴定和不同培养基及生化试验。检出率最高的细菌是大肠杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌(23.52%),其次是腐生葡萄球菌、粪Entrococcus(17.64%)和粪Entrococcus(8.82%),其次是产氧杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、普通变形杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌(5.88%),miralilproteus检出率仅为2.94%。报告了不同抗生素的效果,庆大霉素和氯霉素的效果最大(分别为80%和70%)。左氧氟沙星50%,阿米卡星和呋喃妥因40%,头孢曲松和阿莫西林30%,头孢克肟10%。总之,尿培养前用药不当导致革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌的患病率增加,并产生多药耐药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信