Feature distillation and accumulated selection for automated fraudulent publisher classification from user click data of online advertising

IF 1.7 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
D. Sisodia, Dilip Singh Sisodia
{"title":"Feature distillation and accumulated selection for automated fraudulent publisher classification from user click data of online advertising","authors":"D. Sisodia, Dilip Singh Sisodia","doi":"10.1108/dta-09-2021-0233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe problem of choosing the utmost useful features from hundreds of features from time-series user click data arises in online advertising toward fraudulent publisher's classification. Selecting feature subsets is a key issue in such classification tasks. Practically, the use of filter approaches is common; however, they neglect the correlations amid features. Conversely, wrapper approaches could not be applied due to their complexities. Moreover, in particular, existing feature selection methods could not handle such data, which is one of the major causes of instability of feature selection.Design/methodology/approachTo overcome such issues, a majority voting-based hybrid feature selection method, namely feature distillation and accumulated selection (FDAS), is proposed to investigate the optimal subset of relevant features for analyzing the publisher's fraudulent conduct. FDAS works in two phases: (1) feature distillation, where significant features from standard filter and wrapper feature selection methods are obtained using majority voting; (2) accumulated selection, where we enumerated an accumulated evaluation of relevant feature subset to search for an optimal feature subset using effective machine learning (ML) models.FindingsEmpirical results prove enhanced classification performance with proposed features in average precision, recall, f1-score and AUC in publisher identification and classification.Originality/valueThe FDAS is evaluated on FDMA2012 user-click data and nine other benchmark datasets to gauge its generalizing characteristics, first, considering original features, second, with relevant feature subsets selected by feature selection (FS) methods, third, with optimal feature subset obtained by the proposed approach. ANOVA significance test is conducted to demonstrate significant differences between independent features.","PeriodicalId":56156,"journal":{"name":"Data Technologies and Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data Technologies and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dta-09-2021-0233","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

PurposeThe problem of choosing the utmost useful features from hundreds of features from time-series user click data arises in online advertising toward fraudulent publisher's classification. Selecting feature subsets is a key issue in such classification tasks. Practically, the use of filter approaches is common; however, they neglect the correlations amid features. Conversely, wrapper approaches could not be applied due to their complexities. Moreover, in particular, existing feature selection methods could not handle such data, which is one of the major causes of instability of feature selection.Design/methodology/approachTo overcome such issues, a majority voting-based hybrid feature selection method, namely feature distillation and accumulated selection (FDAS), is proposed to investigate the optimal subset of relevant features for analyzing the publisher's fraudulent conduct. FDAS works in two phases: (1) feature distillation, where significant features from standard filter and wrapper feature selection methods are obtained using majority voting; (2) accumulated selection, where we enumerated an accumulated evaluation of relevant feature subset to search for an optimal feature subset using effective machine learning (ML) models.FindingsEmpirical results prove enhanced classification performance with proposed features in average precision, recall, f1-score and AUC in publisher identification and classification.Originality/valueThe FDAS is evaluated on FDMA2012 user-click data and nine other benchmark datasets to gauge its generalizing characteristics, first, considering original features, second, with relevant feature subsets selected by feature selection (FS) methods, third, with optimal feature subset obtained by the proposed approach. ANOVA significance test is conducted to demonstrate significant differences between independent features.
基于网络广告用户点击数据的特征提取与累积选择,实现虚假发布者自动分类
从时间序列用户点击数据的数百个特征中选择最有用的特征的问题出现在针对欺诈性出版商分类的在线广告中。在这类分类任务中,选择特征子集是一个关键问题。实际上,过滤器方法的使用是常见的;然而,他们忽略了特征之间的相关性。相反,包装器方法由于其复杂性而不能应用。特别是现有的特征选择方法无法处理这类数据,这是导致特征选择不稳定的主要原因之一。设计/方法/方法为了克服这些问题,提出了一种基于多数投票的混合特征选择方法,即特征蒸馏和累积选择(FDAS),以研究用于分析出版商欺诈行为的相关特征的最佳子集。FDAS工作分为两个阶段:(1)特征蒸馏,使用多数投票从标准滤波器和包装器特征选择方法中获得重要特征;(2)累积选择,我们枚举相关特征子集的累积评估,以使用有效的机器学习(ML)模型搜索最优特征子集。实证结果表明,本文提出的特征在发布者识别和分类中的平均准确率、召回率、f1-score和AUC等方面提高了分类性能。在FDMA2012用户点击数据和其他9个基准数据集上对FDAS进行评估,以衡量其泛化特征,首先考虑原始特征,其次使用特征选择(FS)方法选择相关特征子集,第三,使用本文方法获得的最优特征子集。进行方差分析显著性检验,以证明独立特征之间存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Data Technologies and Applications
Data Technologies and Applications Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Previously published as: Program Online from: 2018 Subject Area: Information & Knowledge Management, Library Studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信