Mark A. Reinecke Ph.D., Theresa M. Schultz M.A.
{"title":"Comparison of self–report and clinician ratings of depression among outpatient adolescents","authors":"Mark A. Reinecke Ph.D., Theresa M. Schultz M.A.","doi":"10.1002/depr.3050030310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To determine whether adolescents' scores on clinician-ating and self–report scales for depression were comparable, a sample of 43 adolescent outpatients completed four objective, self–report questionnaires. Their scores on these measures were compared with each other and with clinicians' scores on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Correlations between the self-report questionnaires ranged from .52 to .88 (P ± .001); whereas their correlations with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression ranged from .56 to .66. While supportive of the convergent validity of these measures, our findings suggest that important differences exist between alternative measures of depression, and that scores derived from different scales may not be equivalent. Depression 3:139–145 (1995). © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</p>","PeriodicalId":11179,"journal":{"name":"Depression","volume":"3 3","pages":"139-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/depr.3050030310","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/depr.3050030310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Abstract
To determine whether adolescents' scores on clinician-ating and self–report scales for depression were comparable, a sample of 43 adolescent outpatients completed four objective, self–report questionnaires. Their scores on these measures were compared with each other and with clinicians' scores on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Correlations between the self-report questionnaires ranged from .52 to .88 (P ± .001); whereas their correlations with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression ranged from .56 to .66. While supportive of the convergent validity of these measures, our findings suggest that important differences exist between alternative measures of depression, and that scores derived from different scales may not be equivalent. Depression 3:139–145 (1995). © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
门诊青少年抑郁自我报告与临床评分的比较
为了确定青少年在抑郁症临床诊断和自我报告量表上的得分是否具有可比性,43名青少年门诊患者完成了四份客观的自我报告问卷。他们在这些措施上的得分相互比较,并与临床医生在汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表上的得分进行比较。自述问卷的相关系数为0.52 ~ 0.88 (P±0.001);而他们与汉密尔顿抑郁量表的相关性在0.56到0.66之间。虽然支持这些测量的收敛有效性,但我们的研究结果表明,不同的抑郁测量方法之间存在重要差异,不同量表得出的分数可能不相等。抑郁症:139 - 145(1995)。©1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。