From lexical collation to significant omissions and paraphrases: New evidence for refining relations within the Prick of Conscience Group-IV Manuscripts

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Edurne Garrido
{"title":"From lexical collation to significant omissions and paraphrases: New evidence for refining relations within the Prick of Conscience Group-IV Manuscripts","authors":"Edurne Garrido","doi":"10.17811/selim.27.2022.114-165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The Prick of Conscience is known to have survived in 97 manuscripts of the Main Version, 19 \nof the Southern Recension, and about 50 short extracts. An initial collation of one lexical item in the 97 \nextant copies of the Main Version and subsequent comparison of another 109 items in 54 of these copies \nallow for identifying parallel variant readings throughout the poem’s almost 10,000 lines. Those variants \noften transcend the word level affecting the line, the couplet, or more extensive passages. This paper \ncontributes to refining textual relations within the Group-IV family of the work by showing distinct \nvariance common to Dublin, Trinity College, 157 (D.4.11) (MV 21), London, Sion College, Arc. L. 40. \n2/E. 25 (MV 49), and Shrewsbury, School, III (Mus. III. 39) (MV 95). Apart from unfolding and expanding \nthe extent of the relationship pointed out by Lewis & McIntosh (1982), this research also proves that the \nhitherto unsubclassified London, Lambeth Palace, 492 (MV 48) is another member of the subgroup. To \nillustrate how the proposed subset relates to a version closer to the presumed original and other Group-IV \nwitnesses, readings from the following London, British Library manuscripts are also provided for reference: \nCotton Galba E. IX (MV 27); Harley 4196 (MV 34); Egerton 657 (MV 29); Additional 22283 (MV 40).","PeriodicalId":44450,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of English Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of English Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17811/selim.27.2022.114-165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract: The Prick of Conscience is known to have survived in 97 manuscripts of the Main Version, 19 of the Southern Recension, and about 50 short extracts. An initial collation of one lexical item in the 97 extant copies of the Main Version and subsequent comparison of another 109 items in 54 of these copies allow for identifying parallel variant readings throughout the poem’s almost 10,000 lines. Those variants often transcend the word level affecting the line, the couplet, or more extensive passages. This paper contributes to refining textual relations within the Group-IV family of the work by showing distinct variance common to Dublin, Trinity College, 157 (D.4.11) (MV 21), London, Sion College, Arc. L. 40. 2/E. 25 (MV 49), and Shrewsbury, School, III (Mus. III. 39) (MV 95). Apart from unfolding and expanding the extent of the relationship pointed out by Lewis & McIntosh (1982), this research also proves that the hitherto unsubclassified London, Lambeth Palace, 492 (MV 48) is another member of the subgroup. To illustrate how the proposed subset relates to a version closer to the presumed original and other Group-IV witnesses, readings from the following London, British Library manuscripts are also provided for reference: Cotton Galba E. IX (MV 27); Harley 4196 (MV 34); Egerton 657 (MV 29); Additional 22283 (MV 40).
从词汇整理到重要的遗漏和释义:在良心之刺第四组手稿中精炼关系的新证据
摘要:《良心的刺痛》在主版的97份手稿、南方版的19份手稿和大约50个简短的节选中幸存下来。对主要版本现存的97个副本中的一个词汇进行初步整理,随后对54个副本中的另外109个词汇进行比较,可以在诗歌的近10,000行中识别出平行的变体阅读。这些变体往往超越了单词的层次,影响到一行、对句或更广泛的段落。本文通过展示都柏林,三一学院,157 (D.4.11) (MV 21),伦敦,锡安学院,Arc共同的明显差异,有助于精炼第四组家庭中的文本关系。l . 40。2 / E。25 (MV 49)和什鲁斯伯里,学校,III (Mus。3(mv 95)。除了展开和扩大Lewis & McIntosh(1982)所指出的关系的范围外,本研究还证明了迄今为止未分类的London, Lambeth Palace, 492 (MV 48)是该子组的另一个成员。为了说明拟议的子集如何与更接近假定的原始版本和其他第四组证人的版本相关联,还提供了以下伦敦大英图书馆手稿的阅读材料以供参考:Cotton Galba E. IX (MV 27);哈雷4196 (MV 34);埃格顿657 (MV 29);附加22283 (MV 40)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of English Studies (IJES) is a double-blind peer review journal which seeks to reflect the newest research in the general field of English Studies: English Language and Linguistics, Applied English Linguistics, Literature in English and Cultural studies of English-speaking countries. We will give preference to keeping the balance amongst the areas and subareas belonging to English Studies whenever possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信