Home-garden Ethnobotanical Studi on Stunting Cases in The Kalipuro Settlement, Banyuwangi

Budi Wahono, L. Hakim, H. Kartikaningsih
{"title":"Home-garden Ethnobotanical Studi on Stunting Cases in The Kalipuro Settlement, Banyuwangi","authors":"Budi Wahono, L. Hakim, H. Kartikaningsih","doi":"10.59888/ajosh.v1i11.93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to describe and map the differences in ethnobotany of residential gardens with cases of stunting and without stunting. This research is both quantitative and qualitative. Data collection was carried out using semi-structured interviews and field observations at 20 points of the squared plot of vegetation observations which also became a source of information. The data obtained was then analyzed for vegetation using the Shannon-Wiener index method and the use value of species. The results showed that there were differences in preferences for the use of plants in local community settlements with cases of stunting and non-stunting. Utilization of plants with the highest UVs were in settlements with cases of stunting, namely Zingiber officinale, Pandanus amaryllifolius and Amorphophallus muelleri, while in the yards without stunting cases were Actinocarpus commansi Blanco, Magnolia acuminata (L.) , Moringa olefira Lam, and Artocarpus altilis (Parkison ex F.A.Zorn) Fosberg. Communities in settlements without stunting cases consume intensely sources of food from their garden plots, while people in settlements with stunting cases do not. In particular, Moringa plants are only found in residential yard gardens without stunting and are not found in settlements with stunting cases.","PeriodicalId":92175,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of research in social sciences and humanities","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of research in social sciences and humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v1i11.93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to describe and map the differences in ethnobotany of residential gardens with cases of stunting and without stunting. This research is both quantitative and qualitative. Data collection was carried out using semi-structured interviews and field observations at 20 points of the squared plot of vegetation observations which also became a source of information. The data obtained was then analyzed for vegetation using the Shannon-Wiener index method and the use value of species. The results showed that there were differences in preferences for the use of plants in local community settlements with cases of stunting and non-stunting. Utilization of plants with the highest UVs were in settlements with cases of stunting, namely Zingiber officinale, Pandanus amaryllifolius and Amorphophallus muelleri, while in the yards without stunting cases were Actinocarpus commansi Blanco, Magnolia acuminata (L.) , Moringa olefira Lam, and Artocarpus altilis (Parkison ex F.A.Zorn) Fosberg. Communities in settlements without stunting cases consume intensely sources of food from their garden plots, while people in settlements with stunting cases do not. In particular, Moringa plants are only found in residential yard gardens without stunting and are not found in settlements with stunting cases.
班育旺吉卡里普罗聚落发育迟缓病例的庭园民族植物学研究
本研究旨在描述和绘制有发育迟缓和没有发育迟缓的住宅花园的民族植物学差异。这项研究是定量的和定性的。数据收集采用半结构化访谈和20个植被观测平方图点的实地观测进行,这也成为信息来源。利用Shannon-Wiener指数法和物种利用价值对得到的数据进行植被分析。结果表明,发育不良和非发育不良人群对植物利用的偏好存在差异。紫外光利用率最高的植物是发育不良群落的姜、香豆和紫穗槐,而未发育不良群落的紫外光利用率最高的植物是放线木、白玉兰、辣木和阿托卡普。没有发育不良病例的住区社区大量消耗来自菜园的食物来源,而有发育不良病例的住区居民则不这样做。特别是,辣木植物只在没有发育不良的住宅庭院花园中发现,在有发育不良病例的定居点中没有发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信