{"title":"Conditional form and meaning in economics text","authors":"Richard Mead , Willie Henderson","doi":"10.1016/0272-2380(93)90004-Q","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The paper analyses economics text and examines the range meanings conveyed by the simple conditional form (<em>if</em> + noun phrase + verb phrase [verb present/modal + verb] + … and the expression of conditional meaning. The data comes from a well known introductory textbook. The author of the book claims the status of a science for his subject and argues that scientific predictions in economics have a recognisable form: <em>if</em> + noun phrase + verb phrase [verb present] + <em>then</em> + noun phrase + verb phrase [verb future],as in “<em>if</em> you do this <em>then</em> such and such will follow”. But examples from his own work belie this. We show, firstly, that economics predictions are expressed by a range of conditional and nonconditional forms. Secondly, these same conditional forms (including that expressing a prediction) are used to realise a number of functions. These functions are classified and discussed. It is concluded that the relationships between economic concepts and their verbal expressions cannot be precisely correlated. And both teachers of English for economics and teachers of economics need to recognise this lack of correlation as a source of difficulty for their students.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101229,"journal":{"name":"The ESP Journal","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 139-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0272-2380(93)90004-Q","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The ESP Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/027223809390004Q","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Abstract
The paper analyses economics text and examines the range meanings conveyed by the simple conditional form (if + noun phrase + verb phrase [verb present/modal + verb] + … and the expression of conditional meaning. The data comes from a well known introductory textbook. The author of the book claims the status of a science for his subject and argues that scientific predictions in economics have a recognisable form: if + noun phrase + verb phrase [verb present] + then + noun phrase + verb phrase [verb future],as in “if you do this then such and such will follow”. But examples from his own work belie this. We show, firstly, that economics predictions are expressed by a range of conditional and nonconditional forms. Secondly, these same conditional forms (including that expressing a prediction) are used to realise a number of functions. These functions are classified and discussed. It is concluded that the relationships between economic concepts and their verbal expressions cannot be precisely correlated. And both teachers of English for economics and teachers of economics need to recognise this lack of correlation as a source of difficulty for their students.
本文通过对经济学文本的分析,考察了简单条件形式(if +名词短语+动词短语[动词现在时/情态+动词]+…)所传达的范围意义以及条件意义的表达。这些数据来自一本著名的入门教科书。这本书的作者声称他的主题是一门科学,并认为经济学中的科学预测有一个可识别的形式:如果+名词短语+动词短语[动词现在]+ then +名词短语+动词短语[动词将来],就像“如果你这样做,那么这样和那样将会紧随其后”。但从他自己的作品中可以看出这一点。我们首先表明,经济预测是由一系列条件和非条件形式表示的。其次,这些相同的条件形式(包括表示预测的形式)用于实现许多功能。对这些函数进行了分类和讨论。结论是,经济概念与其语言表达之间的关系不能精确关联。经济学英语教师和经济学教师都需要认识到,这种相关性的缺乏是学生们感到困难的一个原因。